Anterior trunk muscle shows mix of axial and appendicular developmental patterns.

BACKGROUND: Skeletal muscle in the trunk derives from the somites, paired segments of paraxial mesoderm. Whereas axial musculature develops within the somite, appendicular muscle develops following migration of muscle precursors into lateral plate mesoderm. The development of muscles bridging axial and appendicular systems appears mixed. RESULTS: We examine development of three migratory muscle precursor-derived muscles in zebrafish: the sternohyoideus (SH), pectoral fin (PF), and posterior hypaxial (PHM) muscles. We show there is an anterior to posterior gradient to the developmental gene expression and maturation of these three muscles. SH muscle precursors exhibit a long delay between migration and differentiation, PF muscle precursors exhibit a moderate delay in differentiation, and PHM muscle precursors show virtually no delay between migration and differentiation. Using lineage tracing, we show that lateral plate contribution to the PHM muscle is minor, unlike its known extensive contribution to the PF muscle and absence in the ventral extension of axial musculature. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that PHM development is intermediate between a migratory muscle mode and an axial muscle mode of development, wherein the PHM differentiates after a very short migration of its precursors and becomes more anterior primarily by elongation of differentiated muscle fibers.

Hox5 Genes Regulate the Wnt2/2b-Bmp4-Signaling Axis during Lung Development.

Hox genes are required for proper anteroposterior axial patterning and the development of several organ systems. Here, we show that all three Hox5 paralogous genes play redundant roles in the developing lung. Hoxa5;Hoxb5;Hoxc5 triple-mutant embryos develop severely hypoplastic lungs with reduced branching and proximal-distal patterning defects. Hox5 genes are exclusively expressed in the lung mesoderm; however, defects are observed in both lung mesenchyme and endodermally derived epithelium, demonstrating that Hox5 genes act to regulate mesodermal-epithelial crosstalk during development. We show that Hox5 loss of function leads to loss of Wnt2/2b expression in the distal lung mesenchyme and the downregulation of previously identified downstream targets of Wnt2/2b signaling, including Lef1, Axin2, and Bmp4. Wnt2/2b-enriched media rescue proper Sox2/Sox9 patterning and restore Bmp4 expression in Hox5 triple-mutant lung explants. Taken together, these data show that Hox5 genes are key upstream mesenchymal regulators of the Wnt2/2b-Bmp4-signaling axis critical for proper lung patterning.

The dawn of chelonian research: turtles between comparative anatomy and embryology in the 19th century.

Many evo-devo studies of the turtle's shell draw hypotheses and support from historical sources. The groundbreaking works of Cuvier, Geoffroy St. Hilaire, Carus, Rathke, Owen, and others are being revived in modern research, and their centuries-old understanding of the turtle's shell reconsidered. In the works of these eminent biologists of the 19th century, comparative anatomy and embryology of turtle morphology set the stage for future studies in developmental biology, histology, and paleontology. Given the impact that these works still make on modern research, it is important to develop a thorough appreciation of previous authors, regarding how they arrived at their conclusions (i.e., what counted as evidence?), whether there was debate amongst these authors about shell development (i.e., what counted as an adequate explanation?), and even why these men, some of the most powerful and influential thinkers and anatomists of their day, were concerned with turtles. By tracing and exposing the context and content of turtle shell studies in history, our aim is to inform modern debates about the evolution and development of the turtle's shell.

Body wall development in lamprey and a new perspective on the origin of vertebrate paired fins.

Classical hypotheses regarding the evolutionary origin of paired appendages propose transformation of precursor structures (gill arches and lateral fin folds) into paired fins. During development, gnathostome paired appendages form as outgrowths of body wall somatopleure, a tissue composed of somatic lateral plate mesoderm (LPM) and overlying ectoderm. In amniotes, LPM contributes connective tissue to abaxial musculature and forms ventrolateral dermis of the interlimb body wall. The phylogenetic distribution of this character is uncertain because lineage analyses of LPM have not been generated in anamniotes. We focus on the evolutionary history of the somatopleure to gain insight into the tissue context in which paired fins first appeared. Lampreys diverged from other vertebrates before the acquisition of paired fins and provide a model for investigating the preappendicular condition. We present vital dye fate maps that suggest the somatopleure is eliminated in lamprey as the LPM is separated from the ectoderm and sequestered to the coelomic linings during myotome extension. We also examine the distribution of postcranial mesoderm in catshark and axolotl. In contrast to lamprey, our findings support an LPM contribution to the trunk body wall of these taxa, which is similar to published data for amniotes. Collectively, these data lead us to hypothesize that a persistent somatopleure in the lateral body wall is a gnathostome synapomorphy, and the redistribution of LPM was a key step in generating the novel developmental module that ultimately produced paired fins. These embryological criteria can refocus arguments on paired fin origins and generate hypotheses testable by comparative studies on the source, sequence, and extent of genetic redeployment.

3D reconstructions of quail-chick chimeras provide a new fate map of the avian scapula.

Limbed vertebrates have functionally integrated postcranial axial and appendicular systems derived from two distinct populations of embryonic mesoderm. The axial skeletal elements arise from the paraxial somites, the appendicular skeleton and sternum arise from the somatic lateral plate mesoderm, and all of the muscles for both systems arise from the somites. Recent studies in amniotes demonstrate that the scapula has a mixed mesodermal origin. Here we determine the relative contribution of somitic and lateral plate mesoderm to the avian scapula from quail-chick chimeras. We generate 3D reconstructions of the grafted tissue in the host revealing a very different distribution of somitic cells in the scapula than previously reported. This novel 3D visualization of the cryptic border between somitic and lateral plate populations reveals the dynamics of musculoskeletal morphogenesis and demonstrates the importance of 3D visualization of chimera data. Reconstructions of chimeras make clear three significant contrasts with existing models of scapular development. First, the majority of the avian scapula is lateral plate derived and the somitic contribution to the scapular blade is significantly smaller than in previous models. Second, the segmentation of the somitic component of the blade is partially lost; and third, there are striking differences in growth rates between different tissues derived from the same somites that contribute to the structures of the cervical thoracic transition, including the scapula. These data call for the reassessment of theories on the development, homology, and evolution of the vertebrate scapula.

Evolution of median fin modules in the axial skeleton of fishes.

Detailed examples of how hierarchical assemblages of modules change over time are few. We found broadly conserved phylogenetic patterns in the directions of development within the median fins of fishes. From these, we identify four modules involved in their positioning and patterning. The evolutionary sequence of their hierarchical assembly and secondary dissociation is described. The changes in these modules during the evolution of fishes appear to be produced through dissociation, duplication and divergence, and co-option. Although the relationship between identified median fin modules and underlying mechanisms is unclear, Hox addresses may be correlated. Comparing homologous gene expression and function in various fishes may test these predictions.The earliest actinopterygians likely had dorsal and anal fins that were symmetrically positioned via a positioning module. The common patterning (differentiation) of skeletal elements within the dorsal and anal fins may have been set into motion by linkage to this positioning module. Frequent evolutionary changes in dorsal and anal fin position indicate a high level of dissociability of the positioning module from the patterning module. In contrast, the patterning of the dorsal and anal fins remains linked: In nearly all fishes, the endo- and exoskeletal elements of the two fins co-differentiate. In all fishes, the exoskeletal fin rays differentiate in the same directions as the endoskeletal supports, indicating complete developmental integration. In acanthopterygians, a new first dorsal fin module evolved via duplication and divergence. The median fins provide an example of how basic modularity is maintained over 400 million years of evolution.

The development and homology of the chelonian carpus and tarsus.

The long-standing controversies involving the number and homologies of the elements of the carpus and tarsus of turtles are reviewed from a developmental perspective. The analysis is based on a detailed description of the chondrogenesis of the carpus and tarsus in the species Chelydra serpentina and Chrysemys picta. The first stage described is the differentiation of a Y-shaped chondrogenetic condensation involving the humerus (femur)-radius/ ulna (tibia/fibula). This stage is followed by the early formation of a series of connected condensations off the distal end of the postaxial element (ulna or fibula). This linear array, which we refer to as the primary axis, comprises the ulnare-distal carpal 4-metacarpal 4 in the carpus and the fibulare-distal tarsal 4-metatarsal 4 in the tarsus. There are two precondensations that branch off the primary axis. The proximal one will soon form the intermedium while the distal one will generate a digital arch that will give rise sequentially to digits 3-2-1, in this order. Digit 5 is not part of the digital arch and forms as an independent condensation. We emphasize that chondrogenetic foci often form as "branches" off existing condensations. This well-defined pattern of connectivity is used to establish unambiguous homologies and allows comparisons with other vertebrates. We conclude that preaxial elements such as the radiale and tibiale are absent in the turtles examined and probably in all turtles. The observed proximal elements that form in the anterior region of the limb and that are often homologized as radiale or tibiale have clear connections to the postaxial elements. For this reason we argue that these elements should be homologized as centralia. Therefore, we find two chondrogenetic condensations in the tarsus and three in the carpus, which we consider centralia. They subsequently fuse with neighboring elements in a complex pattern. We also describe the variable presence of a late-developing element in the tarsus of Chelydra, which, to our knowledge, has never been described. We propose this element to be an atavistic pretarsale. Comparison of the chondrogenetic pattern in turtles with those described in the literature for other vertebrates indicates that there are two invariant patterns in all tetrapods with the exception of the urodeles. These are (1) the primary axis and (2) the digital arch.