The lateral somitic frontier in ontogeny and phylogeny.

The vertebrate musculoskeletal system comprises the axial and appendicular systems. The postcranial axial system consists of the vertebrae, ribs and associated muscles, and the appendicular system comprises the muscles and skeleton of the paired appendages and their respective girdles. The morphology, proportions, and arrangements of these parts have undergone tremendous variation during vertebrate history. Despite this vertebrate diversity, the cells that form all of the key parts of the musculoskeletal system during development arise from two populations of embryonic mesoderm, the somites and somatic lateral plate. Nowicki et al. (2003. Mech Dev 120:227-240) identified two dynamic domains in the developing chick embryo. The primaxial domain is populated exclusively by cells from the somites. The abaxial domain includes muscle and bone that develop within lateral plate-derived connective tissue. The boundary between the two domains is the lateral somitic frontier. We hypothesize that the primaxial and abaxial domains are patterned independently and that morphological evolution of the musculoskeletal system is facilitated by partially independent developmental changes in the abaxial and primaxial domain. Here we present our hypothesis in detail and review recent experimental and comparative studies that use the concept of the lateral somitic frontier in the analysis of the evolution of the highly derived chelonian and limbless squamate body plans.

Visualizing the lateral somitic frontier in the Prx1Cre transgenic mouse.

Changes in the organization of the musculoskeletal system have accounted for many evolutionary adaptations in the vertebrate body plan. The musculoskeletal system develops from two mesodermal populations: somitic mesoderm gives rise to the axial skeleton and all of the skeletal muscle of the body, and lateral plate mesoderm gives rise to the appendicular skeleton. The recognition of embryonic domains resulting from the dynamics of morphogenesis has inspired new terminology based on developmental criteria. Two mesodermal domains are defined, primaxial and abaxial. The primaxial domain includes musculoskeletal structures comprising just somitic cells. The abaxial domain contains somitic myoblasts in connective tissue derived from lateral plate mesoderm, as well as lateral plate-derived skeletal structures. The boundary between these two domains is the lateral somitic frontier. Recent studies have described the developmental relationship between these two domains in the chick. In the present study, we describe the labelling pattern in the body of the Prx1/Cre/Z/AP compound transgenic mouse. The enhancer employed in this transgenic leads to reporter expression in the postcranial, somatic lateral plate mesoderm. The boundary between labelled and unlabelled cell populations is described at embryonic day (E)13.5 and E15.5. We argue that the distribution of labelled cells is consistent with the somatic lateral plate lineage, and therefore provides an estimate of the position of the lateral somitic frontier. The role of the frontier in both development and evolution is discussed.

Global patterning of the vertebrate mesoderm.

We describe recent advances in the understanding of patterning in the vertebrate post-cranial mesoderm. Specifically, we discuss the integration of local information into global level information that results in the overall coordination along the anterioposterior axis. Experiments related to the integration of the axial and appendicular musculoskeletal systems are considered, and examples of genetic interactions between these systems are outlined. We emphasize the utility of the terms primaxial and abaxial as an aid to understanding development of the vertebrate musculoskeletal system, and hypothesize that the lateral somitic frontier is a catalyst for evolutionary change.

The lateral somitic frontier: dorso-ventral aspects of anterio-posterior regionalization in avian embryos.

Patterning events along the anterior-posterior (AP) axis of vertebrate embryos result in the distribution of muscle and bone forming a highly effective functional system. A key aspect of regionalized AP patterning results from variation in the migratory pattern of somite cells along the dorsal-ventral (DV) axis of the body. This occurs as somite cell populations expand around the axis or migrate away from the dorsal midline and cross into the lateral plate. The fate of somitic cells has been intensely studied and many details have been reported about inductive signaling from other tissues that influence somite cell fate and behavior. We are interested in understanding the specific differences between somites in particular AP regions and how these differences contribute to the global pattern of the organism. Using orthotopic transplants of segmental plate between quail and chick embryos, we have mapped the interface of the somitic and lateral plate mesoderm during the formation of the body wall in cervical and thoracic regions. This interface does not change dramatically in the mid-cervical region, but undergoes extensive changes in the thoracic region. Based on this regional mapping and consistent with the extensive literature, we suggest a revised method of classifying regions of the body wall that relies on embryonic cell lineages rather than adult functional criteria.

Starting from fins: parallelism in the evolution of limbs and genitalia. The fin-to-limb transition.

The March/April 2002 issue of Evolution and Development focused on three presentations made at the Starting from Fins: Parallelism in the Evolution of Limbs and Genitalia symposium held as part of the 2001 Chicago meeting of the Society of Integrative and Comparative Biology. The intention of the symposium and the publication of the presentations was to extend discussion of the potential and the limits of using serial homologues to understand developmental aspects of morphological evolution. The March/April 2002 issue concentrated on unpaired fin to genitalia transitions. This issue focuses on paired fins to limbs and highlights the need for developmental data to be integrated with data from fossil materal, phylogenetic analysis, and explicitly comparative studies. Coates et al. use phylogenetic methods to explore the limb/fin characters of taxa, but their analysis departs somewhat from the usual in that the reference group for organisms includes sister group taxa not usually considered true tetrapods. They state that including finned taxa from the stem group permits an attempt to distinguish the primitive condition of the characteristics demonstrated by the crown group, that is, "limbed tetrapods." In focusing on limb characters specifically and including aspects of the appendicular girdles, Coates et al. highlight morphological details and trends within a given phylogeny. They also demonstrate the degree of relevance of limb characters during the establishment of lineages and their branching patterns by using only limb characters to generate a tree and use a direct comparison of serial versus special homologies to explore the degree of evolutionary parallelism between fore-and hindlimbs. The preliminary conclusions indicate a high level of independence between the serially homologous fore-and hindlimb. Innes et al. present outcomes from the use of cutting edge molecular genetic approaches to understand developmental aspects of limb morphology. In a manner conceptually similar to Coates et al.'s use of fossil characters, Innes et al. use the serial analysis of gene expression to sort differences from similarities in the gene expression profiles of fore-and hindlimbs of the same embryos. Although these gene expression pattems are likely to reflect the serial homology of the paired limbs, they are silent in terms of our understanding both the profound and subtle differences between fore- and hindlimbs in any given species. Innes et al. point out the volume of data generated by SAGE far exceeds our ability to interpret its biological meaning. The studies presented here and in the March/April issue are excellent examples of the need to interpret complex data in light of collective knowledge of evolutionary history. We hope the insights gained from the symposium and papers contribute to a dialogue on how to integrate different approaches and assist in moving forward the field of Evolution and Development.

Development of the turtle carapace: Implications for the evolution of a novel bauplan.

The chelonian carapace is composed of the endochondral ribs and vertebrae associated with a specialized dermis. The ribs are found in an aberrant position compared to those of all other tetrapods; they are superficial and dorsal to the limb girdles. This morphological arrangement, which constitutes the unique chelonian Bauplan, is examined from a developmental perspective. Embryos of Chelydra serpentina were studied during stages of carapace development. Tissue morphology, autoradiography, and indirect immunofluorescent localization of adhesion molecules indicate that the outgrowth of the embryonic carapace occurs as the result of an epithelial-mesenchymal interaction in the body wall. A carapacial ridge composed of mesenchyme of the dermis and overlying ectoderm is formed dorsal to the ectodermal boundary between somitic and lateral plate mesoderm. It is the anlage of the carapace margin, in which the ribs will eventually terminate. The ectoderm of the carapacial ridge is thickened into a pseudostratified columnar epithelium, which overlies a condensation in the mesenchyme of the dermis. Patterns of cell proliferation and the distribution of N-CAM and fibronectin in the carapacial ridge are consistent with patterns seen in other structures initiated by epithelial-mesenchymal interactions such as feathers and limb buds. Based on an analogy to this developmental mechanism in the development of the limb skeleton, a further analogy with the evolution of the limbs from lateral fin folds is used to form a hypothesis on the evolution of the carapace from elements of the primitive reptilian integument.