ABSTRACT
Introduction: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most prevalent genetic cause of kidney failure. Tolvaptan, a vasopressin 2 receptor antagonist, is the first drug with proven disease-modifying activity. Long-term treatment adherence is crucial, but a considerable fraction of patients discontinue treatment, because of aquaretic side effects. Methods: Twenty-four-hour urine was collected in 75 patients with ADPKD during up-titration of tolvaptan and, in combination with clinical characteristics, examined to identify factors influencing urine volume. Patient-reported outcomes were analyzed using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) and patient-reported outcomes questionnaires reporting micturition frequency and burden of urine volume. Results: Initiation of therapy led to a large increase in urine volume followed by only minor further increase during up-dosing. Younger patients and patients with better kidney function experienced a larger relative rise. Twenty-four-hour urine osmolality dropped by about 50% after therapy initiation independently of dose, with a considerable proportion of patients achieving adequate suppression. Sodium and potassium intake turned out to be the only significant modifiable factors for urine volume after multivariate linear regression models, whereas age and weight could be identified as non-modifiable factors. No change in quality of life (QoL) was detected in relation to treatment or urine volume using SF-12 questionnaires, a finding that was further supported by the results of the patient-reported outcomes assessment. Conclusion: This study provides an in-detail analysis of factors associated with the degree of polyuria on tolvaptan and puts them into the context of QoL. These findings will contribute to optimized patient counseling regarding this treatment option in ADPKD.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transplant failure requires the consideration of numerous potential causes including rejection, acute tubular necrosis, infection, and recurrence of the original kidney disease. Kidney biopsy is generally required to approach these differential diagnoses. However, the histopathological findings on their own do not always lead to a definite diagnosis. Consequently, it is crucial to integrate them with clinical findings and patient history when discussing histopathological patterns of injury. The histopathologic finding of a membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) is one of the most challenging constellations since it does not refer to a specific disease entity but rather reflects a pattern of injury that is the result of many different causes. Whilst MPGN is occasionally classified as immune complex mediated, careful evaluation usually reveals an underlying disorder such as chronic infection, plasma cell dyscrasia, complement disorders, and autoimmune disease. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the case of a 43-year-old woman who was referred to us because of a slowly rising serum creatinine 4 years after kidney transplantation. As in the native kidney, the biopsy revealed an MPGN pattern of injury. The cause of this finding had not been established prior to transplantation leading to a classification as idiopathic MPGN in the past. Further workup at the time of presentation and allograft failure revealed chronic infection of a ventriculoatrial shunt as the most probable cause. CONCLUSION: This case underlines the fact that MPGN is not a disease but a histopathological description. Consequently, the causative disorder needs to be identified to avoid kidney failure and recurrence after transplantation.
