Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Stud Alcohol ; 65(5): 621-30, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15536772

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Most patients who misuse alcohol do not receive alcohol counseling from their providers. This study evaluated primary care patient and provider characteristics associated with receipt of alcohol-related advice and whether patients were advised to drink less or to abstain. METHOD: Outpatients from seven Veterans Affairs (VA) general medicine clinics were eligible if they screened positive for alcohol misuse, completed the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and answered questions about alcohol-related treatment and advice. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to evaluate patient and provider characteristics associated with patient reports of alcohol-related advice from a primary care provider in the past year. RESULTS: Among 5191 patients with alcohol misuse in the past year, 1554 (30%) reported receiving alcohol-related advice from their primary care provider during that time. Of patients advised, 73% reported advice to abstain. The likelihood of reporting advice increased as AUDIT scores increased: from 13% of patients with AUDIT scores <8 to 71% of those with scores > or =20. After adjustment for important confounders, measures reflecting the severity of alcohol misuse were most strongly associated with receipt of alcohol-related advice. Adjusted analyses also revealed increased odds of receiving advice among patients who reported liver disease, hypertension, current smoking or continuity of care. No measured provider characteristic was associated with giving advice in the fully adjusted model. CONCLUSIONS: This multisite VA study found that most patients with alcohol misuse did not receive alcohol counseling from a primary care provider. Moreover, providers predominantly offered advice to abstain, and they appeared to focus on patients with the most severe problems due to drinking or medical contraindications to drinking.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol Drinking/therapy , Physicians, Family , Primary Health Care , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Aged , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Ambulatory Care/methods , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Directive Counseling/methods , Directive Counseling/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physicians, Family/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/methods , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/statistics & numerical data
2.
Arch Intern Med ; 163(7): 821-9, 2003 Apr 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12695273

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians need a brief alcohol questionnaire that identifies hazardous drinking and alcohol use disorders. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) questions 1 through 3 (AUDIT-C), and AUDIT question 3 alone are effective alcohol-screening tests in male Veterans Affairs (VA) patients, but have not been validated in women. METHODS: Female VA patients (n = 393) completed self-administered questionnaires, including the 10-item AUDIT and a previously proposed modification to AUDIT question 3 with a sex-specific threshold for binge drinking (>/=4 drinks/occasion), and in-person interviews with the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule. The AUDIT-C, AUDIT question 3 alone, and the 10-item AUDIT were each evaluated with and without the sex-specific binge question and compared with past-year hazardous drinking (>7 drinks/week or >/=4 drinks/occasion) and/or active Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition alcohol abuse or dependence, based on interviews. RESULTS: Eighty-nine women (22.6%) met interview criteria for past-year hazardous drinking and/or active alcohol abuse or dependence. Standard and sex-specific AUDIT-Cs were sensitive (0.81 and 0.84, respectively) and specific (0.86 and 0.85, respectively). Their areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were equivalent (0.91, and 0.92, respectively) and slightly higher than for the standard 10-item AUDIT (0.87). A single, sex-specific question about binge drinking (modified AUDIT question 3) had a sensitivity of 0.69 and specificity of 0.94, whereas the standard AUDIT question 3 was specific (0.96) but relatively insensitive (0.45). CONCLUSIONS: The standard and sex-specific AUDIT-Cs are effective screening tests for past-year hazardous drinking and/or active alcohol abuse or dependence in female patients in a VA study.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking , Alcoholism/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Adult , Aged , Alcoholism/economics , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/economics , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology , Veterans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...