Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mil Med ; 183(suppl_1): 530-537, 2018 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29635585

ABSTRACT

Pacific Partnership is an ongoing yearly humanitarian assistance mission to Pacific Rim countries. Although many case reports and surgical successes have been documented, few data have been published specifically about the primary care mission. This article analyzes outpatient pediatric data collected during Pacific Partnership 2015. Eleven different providers documented care delivered to children from birth through age 18 yr, inclusive. Personally de-identified data were entered into spreadsheets, sorted according to country visited, and analyzed with IBM SPSS software looking for disease frequency. One thousand eighty-seven pediatric patients were seen across Fiji, Papua New Guinea (PNG), and the Philippines (PI). Asthma was the first, second, and third most prevalent diagnosis in PNG, Fiji, and PI, with a relative proportion of the total patients seen at 5.4%, 7.2%, and 5%, respectively. In PI, 123 cases of upper respiratory infection were seen, more than four times the next most common diagnosis of normal exam. Thirty-six patients with scabies were seen in Fiji (number 1), with abdominal pain at number 3 (26 cases, 6.5%). Surprisingly, helminths were rarely seen, comprising the sixteenth and fourteenth most common diagnoses in Fiji and PI and only two cases in PNG. Future Pacific Partnership missions can plan medication stock, personnel assignment, equipment needs, and educational literature based on these data.


Subject(s)
Pediatrics/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Relief Work/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Management , Female , Fiji , Humans , Infant , Male , Papua New Guinea , Philippines
2.
J Grad Med Educ ; 9(4): 473-478, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28824761

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Improving the quality of health care and education has become a mandate at all levels within the medical profession. While several published quality improvement (QI) assessment tools exist, all have limitations in addressing the range of QI projects undertaken by learners in undergraduate medical education, graduate medical education, and continuing medical education. OBJECTIVE: We developed and validated a tool to assess QI projects with learner engagement across the educational continuum. METHODS: After reviewing existing tools, we interviewed local faculty who taught QI to understand how learners were engaged and what these faculty wanted in an ideal assessment tool. We then developed a list of competencies associated with QI, established items linked to these competencies, revised the items using an iterative process, and collected validity evidence for the tool. RESULTS: The resulting Multi-Domain Assessment of Quality Improvement Projects (MAQIP) rating tool contains 9 items, with criteria that may be completely fulfilled, partially fulfilled, or not fulfilled. Interrater reliability was 0.77. Untrained local faculty were able to use the tool with minimal guidance. CONCLUSIONS: The MAQIP is a 9-item, user-friendly tool that can be used to assess QI projects at various stages and to provide formative and summative feedback to learners at all levels.


Subject(s)
Competency-Based Education , Internship and Residency , Interviews as Topic/standards , Quality Improvement , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Delivery of Health Care , Education, Medical, Graduate , Humans , Quality Improvement/standards , Reproducibility of Results
3.
Med Teach ; 36(8): 715-23, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24796358

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Physicians need metacognitive skills including reflection and goal generation for effective lifelong learning (LLL). These skills are not readily assessed and may not correlate with cognitive skills. We examined early-career physicians' metacognition and relationships between metacognitive skills, cognitive skills, and orientation toward LLL. METHODS: Pediatric fellows at UCSF document career progress in annual Individual Development Plans (IDPs). To assess metacognitive skills, we scored narratives in IDPs with a Reflective Ability Rubric (RAR) and goal setting with a SMART Goal Rubric (SMART-GR: consists of global IDP score and four IDP domain subscores). To assess cognitive skills, we collected American Board of Pediatrics scores (ABP), and to measure orientation toward LLL, fellows completed the Jefferson Scale (JeffSPLL). We used Spearman's correlation to examine relationships between scores. RESULTS: About 57/66 (86%) fellows participated. Mean scores were: RAR 2.4 ± 1.3 (scale 0-6); SMART-GR global IDP 2.8 ± 1.0, (1-5); JeffSPLL 46.3 ± 3.9 (14-56); and ABP 559.4 ± 75.7. RAR scores correlated significantly with SMART-GR scores but metacognitive measures did not correlate with ABP scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests early-career physicians may have limited metacognitive skills; cognitive and metacognitive skills do not correlate; and orientation toward LLL does not predict metacognitive skills. Thus, we need improved methods to teach and assess metacognition.


Subject(s)
Cognition , Education, Medical, Continuing , Learning , Pediatrics/education , Academic Medical Centers , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Humans , Male , San Francisco , Thinking
4.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 51(10): 933-8, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22511198

ABSTRACT

Despite the importance of measuring weight and height at well-child visits, there are limited data on frequency of anthropometric documentation. The authors aimed to identify characteristics associated with missing weight and height documentation at preventive visits for children. Among preventive visits for children from birth to 18 years old, recorded in the National Ambulatory Medical Care and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys for 2005-2009, the authors found that 20.8% had missing weight and/or height (n = 19,033) documentation. Compared with infants younger than 2 years, school-age children (odds ratio [OR] = 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.64), and adolescents (OR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.26-2.04) were more likely to lack documentation. Missing documentation was also more likely for visits with nonphysicians (OR = 4.53; 95% CI = 3.17-6.48) and nonpediatricians (OR = 2.63; 95% CI = 2.02-3.41) compared with pediatricians. Efforts to improve weight and height surveillance should be directed to clinics in which midlevel providers and nonpediatric physicians are caring for school-age children and adolescents.


Subject(s)
Body Height , Body Weight , Child Health Services/methods , Documentation/statistics & numerical data , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Preventive Health Services/methods , Adolescent , Child , Child Health Services/standards , Child Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Documentation/standards , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Nurses'/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Preventive Health Services/standards , Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...