Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Genome Ed ; 4: 923718, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35910415

ABSTRACT

Base editors (BEs) are genome editing agents that install point mutations with high efficiency and specificity. Due to their reliance on uracil and inosine DNA damage intermediates (rather than double-strand DNA breaks, or DSBs), it has been hypothesized that BEs rely on more ubiquitous DNA repair pathways than DSB-reliant genome editing methods, which require processes that are only active during certain phases of the cell cycle. We report here the first systematic study of the cell cycle-dependence of base editing using cell synchronization experiments. We find that nickase-derived BEs (which introduce DNA backbone nicks opposite the uracil or inosine base) function independently of the cell cycle, while non-nicking BEs are highly dependent on S-phase (DNA synthesis phase). We found that synchronization in G1 (growth phase) during the process of cytosine base editing causes significant increases in C•G to A•T "byproduct" introduction rates, which can be leveraged to discover new strategies for precise C•G to A•T base editing. We observe that endogenous expression levels of DNA damage repair pathways are sufficient to process base editing intermediates into desired editing outcomes, and the process of base editing does not significantly perturb transcription levels. Overall, our study provides mechanistic data demonstrating the robustness of nickase-derived BEs for performing genome editing across the cell cycle.

2.
Mol Ther ; 29(11): 3125-3139, 2021 11 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34619370

ABSTRACT

The development of CRISPR-derived genome editing technologies has enabled the precise manipulation of DNA sequences within the human genome. In this review, we discuss the initial development and cellular mechanism of action of CRISPR nucleases and DNA base editors. We then describe factors that must be taken into consideration when developing these tools into therapeutic agents, including the potential for unintended and off-target edits when using these genome editing tools, and methods to characterize these types of edits. We finish by considering specific challenges associated with bringing a CRISPR-based therapy to the clinic, including manufacturing, regulatory oversight, and considerations for clinical trials that involve genome editing agents.


Subject(s)
CRISPR-Cas Systems , Gene Editing , Genetic Therapy , Animals , CRISPR-Associated Protein 9 , Clinical Trials as Topic , Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats , Gene Editing/methods , Gene Transfer Techniques , Genetic Engineering , Genetic Therapy/methods , Genetic Therapy/trends , Humans , Models, Animal , RNA, Guide, Kinetoplastida , Recombinational DNA Repair , Translational Research, Biomedical/methods , Translational Research, Biomedical/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...