Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 47(12): 2188-2195, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36257600

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Vancomycin is commonly used during outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of vancomycin is recommended to ensure effective and safe therapy, as use has been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: The MarketScan® Commercial Database was queried from 2010 to 2016 to identify patients aged 18-64 years discharged from an inpatient hospitalization on vancomycin OPAT. The primary endpoint was hospital readmission with AKI within 6 weeks of index hospital discharge. TDM was defined as at least one vancomycin level obtained during outpatient therapy. Bivariate analysis was used to examine associations with outcomes; significant factors were incorporated into a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 14,196 patients were included in the study; median age was 54 years and 53.8% were male. Readmission with AKI occurred in 385 (2.7%) and was independently associated with chronic kidney disease (aOR 2.63 [95%CI 1.96-3.52]), congestive heart failure (1.81 [1.34-2.44]), chronic liver disease (1.74 [1.17-2.59]), hypertension (1.73 [1.39-2.17]), septicemia (1.61 [1.30-2.00]), and concomitant OPAT with IV penicillins (1.73 [1.21-2.49]) while skin and soft tissue infection (0.67 [0.54-0.83]) and surgical site infection (0.74 [0.59-0.93]) were associated with lower risk of readmission with AKI. TDM was not associated with lower risk of readmission with AKI. CONCLUSION: Chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic liver disease, septicemia, and concomitant OPAT with IV penicillins were significantly associated with higher risk of readmission with AKI during vancomycin OPAT.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Anti-Infective Agents , Heart Failure , Hypertension , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Sepsis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Vancomycin/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Outpatients , Patient Readmission , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Penicillins , Sepsis/drug therapy , Hypertension/drug therapy , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/chemically induced
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33846129

ABSTRACT

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is a safe, effective, and convenient treatment strategy for patients receiving intravenous antimicrobials in the outpatient setting; however, data are limited describing the use and safety of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB). Records of patients receiving L-AMB OPAT between 1/1/2015 and 7/31/2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary objective was to describe the OPAT patient population discharged on L-AMB and evaluate factors associated with readmission and adverse events (AEs). Analysis was performed to evaluate for predictors of worse outcomes. Forty-two patients (67% male, median age 50 years) were identified, most of whom were treated for histoplasmosis. The most common doses of L-AMB were 3 mg/kg (n = 16, 38%) or 5 mg/kg (n = 14, 33%) based on actual body weight. Twenty-six (62%) patients completed their anticipated course of L-AMB. Twenty-two (52%) patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge; median time to readmission was 11 days (interquartile range [IQR] 5 to 18). While hypokalemia and acute kidney injury (AKI) were common, occurring in 26 (62%) and 20 (48%) patients, respectively, only 5 (12%) were readmitted to the hospital due to L-AMB-associated AEs. Ninety percent of patients achieved at least partial renal recovery within 30 days after L-AMB discontinuation. Factors significantly associated with AKI include higher L-AMB dose, lower serum potassium levels after therapy initiation, and receipt of potassium supplementation at discharge. L-AMB is associated with significant AEs; however, these results suggest that treatment is feasible in the outpatient setting with close monitoring, as the majority of AEs were managed effectively in an outpatient without long-term sequelae.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Outpatients , Amphotericin B , Antifungal Agents/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
3.
Ann Pharmacother ; 50(12): 1051-1059, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27520326

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To summarize published data regarding the use of ceftaroline as salvage monotherapy for persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. DATA SOURCES: PubMed (January 1980-June 2016) was searched using combinations of the search terms methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, bacteremia, ceftaroline, refractory, and persistent Supplemental references were generated through review of identified literature citations. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Available English-language, full-text articles pertaining to the use of ceftaroline for persistent MRSA bacteremia (MRSAB) were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: The PubMed search yielded 23 articles for evaluation. There are no randomized controlled trials to date-only case series and reports. Four retrospective case series detailing the use of ceftaroline as monotherapy for persistent MRSAB were included. Most patients received at least 4 days of an appropriate anti-MRSA antimicrobial prior to ceftaroline and were able to clear bacteremia within 3 days. The most common rationales for ceftaroline use were progression of disease or nonresponse to current therapy. Higher off-label dosing of ceftaroline is often utilized to achieve optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters. Adverse events are not well described due to lack of follow-up; however, neutropenia has been associated with prolonged use. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment options for persistent MRSAB remain few and far between. Ceftaroline is an effective agent for the salvage treatment of MRSAB. Off-label doses up to 600 mg every 8 hours are often used to achieve optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters. Because of lack of follow-up in these reports, the incidence of adverse effects of prolonged use of ceftaroline is not well defined.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Salvage Therapy/methods , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cephalosporins/administration & dosage , Cephalosporins/adverse effects , Cephalosporins/pharmacokinetics , Female , Humans , Ceftaroline
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...