Surgical Management of Facial Fractures in Geriatric Patients.

ABSTRACT: Facial fractures comprise a substantial part of traumatology. Due to aging of the population, over the last 20 years, there has been a pattern of redistribution of these fractures with a higher incidence at an older age. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the epidemiology, pattern, and surgical management of facial fractures in geriatric patients presenting at a single tertiary trauma center.This study included patients aged ≥70 years who presented with facial bone fractures between 2008 and 2017 and were treated with surgical interventions. Parameters such as age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, Glasgow Coma Scale score, fracture type, fracture mechanism, concomitant injuries, duration of hospitalization, and postoperative complications were evaluated.A total of 300 patients were included: 118 men (39.3%) and 182 women (60.7%). The mean age was 78.8 years. An orbital floor fracture was the most common injury (35.1%). The most common cause of fracture was a fall at home (67%). A total of 113 patients (37.7%) had 162 concomitant injuries, 35 patients (11.7%) suffered from polytrauma, and 7 patients developed postoperative complications. The average length of stay was 1.67 days in the intensive care unit and 5.50 days in the standard ward. Polytrauma, pre-existing medical conditions, and oral anticoagulation had a significant impact on the duration of hospitalization.Facial fractures are common in combination with other injuries. Women are more often affected than men, and falling at home is the most common cause of facial injuries. Postoperative complications are rare.

Influence of a strictly perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis vs a prolonged postoperative prophylaxis on surgical site infections in maxillofacial surgery.

PURPOSE: The adequate perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in maxillofacial surgery is still under discussion due to the wide range of hard and soft tissue procedures as well as contaminated, semi-contaminated and clean surgical sides. Perioperative antibiosis is an easy applicable tool that can be used to decrease nosocomial morbidity and mortality by reducing the rate of infections. We compared strictly perioperative antibiosis with an extended postoperative prophylactic antibiosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 901 consecutive patients, from a tertiary care maxillofacial surgery department were included and distributed into two groups: The first group received peri- and postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PP; n = 365) from the day of operation until the fifth day postoperatively. The second group was treated with single shot prophylaxis with intraoperative repetition as needed (SSP; n = 536) only. Furthermore, the patients were grouped according to their main diagnosis and surgical procedure. For comparison, general anamnestic data, cultured bacteria and resistances, number of surgical site infections and duration of hospitalization were compared. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in general diseases or extent of surgery between the groups. There was no statistical difference in the surgical site infections between the groups regardless of their diagnosis. There were significant correlations between tracheotomised patients (p < 0.001) as well as patients with a higher BMI (p = 0.009) and the incidence of surgical site infections. Most common cultured bacteria were staphylococci. CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of the study, we believe that a perioperative antibiosis delivers a sufficient prophylaxis for patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery procedures.