Survival and repair durability in patients undergoing concomitant aortic valve reimplantation and mitral valve repair.

Objective: The study objective was to determine repair durability and survival in patients with and without connective tissue disorders undergoing concomitant aortic valve reimplantation and mitral valve repair. Methods: From 2002 to 2019, 68 patients underwent concomitant aortic valve reimplantation and mitral valve repair, including 27 patients with Marfan syndrome (39.7%). Follow-up echocardiograms were analyzed using nonlinear multiphase mixed-effects cumulative logistic regression. The regurgitation grade over time was estimated by averaging patient-specific profiles. Survival and freedom from reoperation were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: At 7 years, 11% of patients had aortic insufficiency greater than mild (severe in 2 patients). There was no difference in greater than mild aortic insufficiency between patients with or without Marfan syndrome (P = .37). Twenty percent of patients had progressed to mitral regurgitation greater than mild (severe in only 1 patient). The prevalence of recurrent mitral regurgitation was higher in those without Marfan syndrome, with greater than mild regurgitation increasing to 24% by 2 years and remaining constant thereafter (P = .04). Freedom from reoperation on the aortic valve or mitral valve was 83% at 10 years and did not differ between Marfan syndrome groups. There were no cases of perioperative mortality. Survival at 5 and 10 years was 94% and 87%, respectively, without a difference between those with and without Marfan syndrome. Conclusions: Patients can undergo a total repair strategy using combined aortic valve reimplantation and mitral valve repair procedures with a low risk of mortality and complications, with favorable freedom from both residual valve regurgitation and reoperation.

Serratus anterior and pectoralis plane blocks for robotically assisted mitral valve repair: a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery provokes substantial pain and therefore analgesic consumption. The effect of fascial plane blocks on analgesic efficacy and overall patient satisfaction remains unclear. We therefore tested the primary hypothesis that fascial plane blocks improve overall benefit analgesia score (OBAS) during the initial 3 days after robotically assisted mitral valve repair. Secondarily, we tested the hypotheses that blocks reduce opioid consumption and improve respiratory mechanics. METHODS: Adults scheduled for robotically assisted mitral valve repairs were randomised to combined pectoralis II and serratus anterior plane blocks or to routine analgesia. The blocks were ultrasound-guided and used a mixture of plain and liposomal bupivacaine. OBAS was measured daily on postoperative Days 1-3 and were analysed with linear mixed effects modelling. Opioid consumption was assessed with a simple linear regression model and respiratory mechanics with a linear mixed model. RESULTS: As planned, we enrolled 194 patients, with 98 assigned to blocks and 96 to routine analgesic management. There was neither time-by-treatment interaction (P=0.67) nor treatment effect on total OBAS over postoperative Days 1-3 with a median difference of 0.08 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.50 to 0.67; P=0.69) and an estimated ratio of geometric means of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.85-1.13; P=0.75). There was no evidence of a treatment effect on cumulative opioid consumption or respiratory mechanics. Average pain scores on each postoperative day were similarly low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Serratus anterior and pectoralis plane blocks did not improve postoperative analgesia, cumulative opioid consumption, or respiratory mechanics during the initial 3 days after robotically assisted mitral valve repair. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03743194.

Early mortality and neurologic outcomes following mitral valve surgery in the very elderly.

OBJECTIVES: Valve repair is the gold standard for treatment of degenerative mitral valve disease. As the population ages, patients undergoing valve degeneration and therefore considered for mitral valve surgery will naturally be getting older. We sought to evaluate whether mitral repair retained a survival advantage over replacement in patients ≥80 years old. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data acquired from the United Kingdom National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit for the outcomes of in-hospital mortality and postoperative cerebrovascular event (CVA). Individual multivariable logistic regression models were created to investigate adjusted associations between these outcomes and type of mitral valve operation, repair or replacement. Additionally, associations between the individual model parameters and in-hospital mortality and CVA were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 1140 patients underwent mitral repair (66.4%, median age 82.3), and 577 patients underwent mitral replacement (33.6%, median age 82.1). The overall age range was 80-92. The incidence of in-hospital mortality favored the repair group (4.4% vs. 8.3%, p = .001). Multivariable logistic regression modeling demonstrated an increased adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality for mitral valve replacement (MVR) (odd ratio [OR]: 2.01, 1.15-3.50, p = .01). The only other parameter associated with an increased adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality was postoperative dialysis (OR: 14.2, 7.67-26.5, p < .001). There was not a demonstrated association between MVR and perioperative CVA (OR: 1.11, 0.49-2.4, p = .8). CONCLUSIONS: In patients ≥80 years old, mitral valve repair (MVr) was shown to be associated with a decreased adjusted odds of mortality, with a null association with CVA. These results suggest that, if feasible, MVr should remain the preferred management strategy, even in the very elderly.

Reoperation after early and late failure of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease.

OBJECTIVES: To determine mechanisms of early and late failure after mitral valve repair for degenerative disease, identify factors associated with re-repair, and evaluate durability of re-repair. METHODS: From January 2008 to July 2020, 330 reoperations were performed for recurrent mitral valve dysfunction after initial valve repair for degenerative disease. Mechanisms of repair failure were determined by review of preoperative imaging and operative reports. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify factors associated with likelihood of re-repair or replacement. Durability of re-repair was assessed using longitudinal analysis of postoperative echo data. RESULTS: Eighty-five of 330 (26%) reoperations were performed for early repair failure within 1 year and 245/330 (74%) for late failure thereafter. Suture/annuloplasty dehiscence, systolic anterior motion, hemolysis, and ventricular remodeling were more common mechanisms of early failure and disease progression and fibrosis late failure. Forty percent (34/85) of early failures were re-repaired versus 24% (59/245) of late failures. Re-repair was more common than replacement in recent years and was associated with earlier reoperation (median 1.5 vs 3.9 years; P = .0001). No in-hospital deaths occurred after re-repair; 2 patients (0.8%) died after valve replacement. Freedom from severe mitral regurgitation after re-repair was 93% at 7 years. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve re-repair can be performed with low rates of mortality and morbidity for early and late valve dysfunction. Mechanisms of early repair failure differ from those of late failure and are generally more amenable to re-repair. In selected patients who present after failed repair, we prefer mitral re-repair to valve replacement whenever technically feasible.

Feasibility and Safety of Same-Day Discharge Following Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge (SDD) following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) compared with next-day discharge (NDD). BACKGROUND: Reducing hospital length of stay is an important goal for patients and hospitals. Cleveland Clinic implemented a post-TAVR SDD pathway beginning in March 2020. METHODS: The study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent "minimalist" outpatient TF-TAVR in 2019 to 2020. SDD was applied to patients who met the predefined criteria. Outcomes included in-hospital and 30-day events and were compared between SDD and NDD (during and prior to availability of the SDD pathway). RESULTS: In 2020, SDD and NDD accounted for 22.1% (n = 114 of 516) and 63.8% (n = 329 of 516) of outpatient TF-TAVR, respectively. SDD patients in 2020, compared with NDD patients in 2019 (n = 481), were younger, were more often male, and had a lower surgical risk. There were no significant differences in in-hospital events and 30-day readmissions (cardiovascular readmission: 3.5% vs 6.2%; P = 0.37; noncardiovascular readmission: 2.6% vs 4.0%; P = 0.78), and there were no deaths after SDD. These outcomes remained consistent after propensity score matching. Only 1 (0.9%) patient required pacemaker implantation after SDD (post-TAVR day 25). As expected based on SDD criteria, multivariable logistic regression analysis identified procedure end-time as the strongest predictor of SDD (adjusted OR: 7.74; 95% CI: 4.39-13.63), while male sex and baseline hemoglobin level were also associated with SDD. CONCLUSIONS: SDD after TF-TAVR was feasible in this early experience without impairing post-discharge safety. Our SDD pathway may serve as a useful strategy to improve bed utilization and reduce hospital stay for TAVR recipients.

A conservative screening algorithm to determine candidacy for robotic mitral valve surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Patient selection for robotically assisted mitral valve repair remains controversial. We assessed outcomes of a conservative screening algorithm developed to select patients with degenerative mitral valve disease for robotic surgery. METHODS: From January 2014 to January 2019, a screening algorithm that included transthoracic echocardiography and computed tomography scanning was rigorously applied by 3 surgeons to assess candidacy of 1000 consecutive patients with isolated degenerative mitral valve disease (age 58 ± 11 years, 67% male) for robotic surgery. Screening results and hospital outcomes of those selected for robotic versus sternotomy approaches were compared. RESULTS: With application of the screening algorithm, 605 patients were selected for robotic surgery. Common reasons for sternotomy (n = 395) were aortoiliac atherosclerosis (n = 74/292, 25%), femoral artery diameter <7 mm (n = 60/292, 20%), mitral annular calcification (n = 83/390, 21%), aortic regurgitation (n = 100/391, 26%), and reduced left ventricular function (n = 126/391, 32%). Mitral valve repair was accomplished in 996. Compared with sternotomy, patients undergoing robotic surgery had less new-onset atrial fibrillation (n = 144/582, 25% vs n = 125/373, 34%; P = .002), fewer red blood cell transfusions (n = 61/601, 10% vs 69/395, 17%; P < .001), and shorter hospital stay (5.2 ± 2.9 days vs 5.9 ± 2.1 days; P < .001). No hospital deaths occurred, and occurrence of postoperative stroke in the robotic (n = 3/605, 0.50%) and sternotomy (n = 4/395, 1.0%; P = .3) groups was similar. CONCLUSIONS: This conservative screening algorithm qualified 60% of patients with isolated degenerative mitral valve disease for robotic surgery. Outcomes were comparable with those obtained with sternotomy, validating this as an approach to select patients for robotic mitral valve surgery.