Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 27(3): 287-93, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16532417

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of environmental and healthcare worker (HCW) contamination with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) during outpatient procedures performed on fecally continent patients currently colonized with VRE (cVRE) or previously colonized with VRE (pVRE). DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Outpatient consultation and radiology rooms and the hemodialysis unit in a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Fecally continent cVRE and pVRE patients. INTERVENTIONS: Both cVRE and pVRE patients attended standardized mock outpatient consultations and routine hemodialysis sessions in an area that had been thoroughly cleaned and microbiologically confirmed to be free of VRE contamination. After each session, the patient, environment, and participating HCW were tested for VRE contamination. RESULTS: Fourteen cVRE patients participated in 49 mock outpatient consultation sessions and radiology sessions or 26 actual hemodialysis sessions, and 7 pVRE patients participated in 28 outpatient consultation sessions. Sessions with cVRE patients had higher rates of contamination of the environment (chair cultures were positive for VRE in 36% of outpatient consultation sessions, 58% of hemodialysis sessions; couch cultures were positive in 48% of outpatient consultation sessions, 42% of radiology sessions, and 45% of hemodialysis sessions), contamination of HCW gowns (gown cultures were positive in 20% of outpatient consultation sessions, 4% of radiology sessions, and 30% of hemodialysis sessions), and contamination of patients' own hands (hand cultures were positive in 36% of outpatient consultation sessions, 25% of radiology sessions, and 54% of hemodialysis sessions). Overall, contamination rates associated with pVRE patients attendance at outpatient consultations were 12% of those noted for cVRE patients (odds ratio, 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.42; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Given the nature of the contamination risk posed by fecally continent cVRE patients undergoing outpatient procedures, infection control measures should focus on effective HCW and patient hand hygiene and chair and couch cleaning, to minimize transmission of VRE.


Subject(s)
Enterococcus/drug effects , Environmental Microbiology , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/microbiology , Feces/microbiology , Referral and Consultation , Renal Dialysis , Vancomycin Resistance , Ambulatory Care , Enterococcus/isolation & purification , Hospital Units , Humans , Personnel, Hospital
2.
Med J Aust ; 183(10): 509-14, 2005 Nov 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16296963

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a multifaceted hand hygiene culture-change program on health care worker behaviour, and to reduce the burden of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. DESIGN AND SETTING: Timetabled introduction of interventions (alcohol/chlorhexidine hand hygiene solution [ACHRS], improved cleaning of shared ward equipment, targeted patient decolonisation, comprehensive "culture change" package) to five clinical areas of a large university teaching hospital that had high levels of MRSA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health care worker hand hygiene compliance; volume of ACHRS used; prevalence of patient and health care worker MRSA colonisation; environmental MRSA contamination; rates of clinical MRSA infection; and rates of laboratory detection of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. RESULTS: In study wards, health care worker hand hygiene compliance improved from a pre-intervention mean of 21% (95% CI, 20.3%-22.9%) to 42% (95% CI, 40.2%-43.8%) 12 months post-intervention (P < 0.001). ACHRS use increased from 5.7 to 28.6 L/1000 bed-days. No change was observed in patient MRSA colonisation or environmental colonisation/contamination, and, except in the intensive care unit, colonisation of health care workers was unchanged. Thirty-six months post-intervention, there had been significant reductions in hospital-wide rates of total clinical MRSA isolates (40% reduction; P < 0.001), patient-episodes of MRSA bacteraemia (57% reduction; P = 0.01), and clinical isolates of ESBL-producing E. coli and Klebsiella spp (90% reduction; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of ACHRS and a detailed culture-change program was effective in improving hand hygiene compliance and reducing nosocomial MRSA infections, despite high-level MRSA endemicity.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Ethanol/therapeutic use , Hand Disinfection/methods , Methicillin Resistance , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/microbiology , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Follow-Up Studies , Guideline Adherence , Hospital Units , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Klebsiella/drug effects , Klebsiella/isolation & purification , Personnel, Hospital , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , beta-Lactam Resistance
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...