ABSTRACT
Antigen testing is an important diagnostic tool for histoplasmosis but has limited availability globally. We evaluated the OIDx urine lateral flow antigen assay among 204 persons suspected to have histoplasmosis. Among patients with proven histoplasmosis, sensitivity was 33.3% (3/9, 95% CI 7.5%-70.1%) and specificity 80.5% (157/195, 95% CI 74.3%-85.8%). The MiraVista urine antigen test had better specificity (96.9%) and equal sensitivity. The OIDx test demonstrated 33.3% (3/9) positive agreement and 84.0% (163/194) negative agreement with the MiraVista test. These results should be considered in the context of our low HIV prevalence population with a mixture of pulmonary and disseminated disease.
We evaluated a new lateral flow antigen test for the diagnosis of histoplasmosis. Proven/probable cases were mostly pulmonary disease making antigen tests likely to be less sensitive in this population. The test had similar sensitivity to the established antigen test but was less specific.
