Assessment of Azeliragon QTc Liability Through Integrated, Model-Based Concentration QTc Analysis.

Azeliragon is an inhibitor of the receptor for advanced glycation end products being developed for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. The objective of the current analysis was to evaluate the relationship between plasma azeliragon concentrations and QT interval. Simultaneous QT values and plasma concentrations were available from 711 subjects (6236 records), pooled from 5 studies in healthy volunteers, 2 studies in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease, and 1 study in patients with type 2 diabetes and persistent albuminuria. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was conducted to describe azeliragon concentration-related changes in QT interval, after correcting for heart rate, using Fridericia's criteria (QTcF) and sex-related differences in baseline QTcF. Azeliragon-related changes in QTcF were predicted using 2 methods: simulation and bias-corrected 90% confidence interval approaches. A small positive relationship between azeliragon plasma concentration and QTcF was noted with a slope of 0.059 ms/ng/mL. Simulations predicted mean (90% prediction interval) changes in QTcF of 0.733 milliseconds (0.32-1.66 milliseconds) with the phase 3 dose (5 mg once daily steady state) and 4.32 milliseconds (1.7-8.74 milliseconds) at supratherapeutic doses (20 mg once daily steady state or 60 mg once daily × 6 days). Bias-corrected upper 90% confidence intervals for therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses were 0.88 and 5.01 milliseconds, respectively. Model-based analysis showed a small, nonclinically meaningful, positive relationship between azeliragon plasma concentration and QTcF with a slope close to zero. Neither the prediction interval nor the upper bound of the 90% confidence interval reached 10 milliseconds, demonstrating no clinically meaningful drug-related effect on QTcF at expected therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of azeliragon.

Multiple-dose ponezumab for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: Safety and efficacy.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple intravenous doses of ponezumab, an anti-amyloid antibody, were evaluated in subjects with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: In part A, 77 subjects were randomized to ponezumab 0.1, 0.5, or 1 mg/kg (75 treated) and 26 to placebo (24 treated). In part B, 63 subjects were randomized and treated with ponezumab 3 or 8.5 mg/kg and 32 with placebo. Subjects received 10 infusions over 18 months and were followed for 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: Ponezumab was generally safe and well tolerated. Most common adverse events were fall (16.7% ponezumab, 21.4% placebo), headache (13.8%, 21.4%), and cerebral microhemorrhage (13.8%, 19.6%). Plasma ponezumab increased dose-dependently with limited accumulation. Cerebrospinal fluid penetration was low. Plasma Aß1-x and Aß1-40 showed robust increases, but cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers showed no dose response. Ponezumab had no effects on cognitive/functional outcomes or brain volume. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple-dose ponezumab was generally safe, but not efficacious, in mild-to-moderate AD.

Effect of TTP488 in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: TTP488, an antagonist at the Receptor for Advanced Glycation End products, was evaluated as a potential treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). A previous report describes decreased decline in ADAS-cog (delta = 3.1, p = 0.008 at 18 months, ANCOVA with multiple imputation), relative to placebo, following a 5 mg/day dose of TTP488. Acute, reversible cognitive worsening was seen with a 20 mg/day dose. The present study further evaluates the efficacy of TTP488 by subgroup analyses based on disease severity and concentration effect analysis. METHODS: 399 patients were randomized to one of two oral TTP488 doses (60 mg for 6 days followed by 20 mg/day; 15 mg for 6 days followed by 5 mg/day) or placebo for 18 months. Pre-specified primary analysis, using an ITT population, was on the ADAS-cog11. Secondary analyses included as a key secondary variable the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), and another secondary variable of the ADCS-ADL. RESULTS: On-treatment analysis demonstrated numerical differences favoring 5 mg/day over placebo, with nominal significance at Month 18 (delta = 2.7, p = 0.03). Patients with mild AD, whether defined by MMSE or ADAS-cog, demonstrated significant differences favoring 5 mg/day on ADAS-cog and trends on CDR-sb and ADCS-ADL at Month 18. TTP488 plasma concentrations of 7.6-16.8 ng/mL were associated with a decreased decline in ADAS-cog over time compared to placebo. Worsening on the ADAS-cog relative to placebo was evident at 46.8-167.0 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Results of these analyses support further investigation of 5 mg/day in future Phase 3 trials in patients with mild AD.

Safety and pharmacology of ponezumab (PF-04360365) after a single 10-minute intravenous infusion in subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease.

OBJECTIVE: Ponezumab (PF-04360365) is a humanized anti-amyloid beta (Aß) monoclonal antibody designed for treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD). A single 2-hour intravenous infusion of 0.1 to 10 mg/kg was previously shown to be safe and well tolerated in subjects with mild to moderate AD, with measurable effects on plasma and cerebrospinal fluid Aß. This phase I, dose-escalation, open-label study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of a single 10-minute intravenous infusion. METHODS: Subjects with mild to moderate AD received ponezumab 1 mg/kg (n = 3), 3 mg/kg (n = 3), 5 mg/kg (n = 4), or 10 mg/kg (n = 5). They were followed up as outpatients for 6 months. RESULTS: All subjects completed the trial. Ponezumab was safe and well tolerated with no deaths, withdrawals, or drug-related moderate, severe, or serious adverse events. Mild drug-related adverse events included headache (3 patients) and lethargy and hypoesthesia (both in 1 patient). No infusion reactions, clinically meaningful laboratory abnormalities, vital sign changes, electrocardiographic changes, or antidrug antibodies were detected. There was no evidence of brain microhemorrhage, vasogenic edema, encephalitis, or other imaging abnormality. Cognitive function showed no treatment-related trends. Ponezumab displayed approximately dose-proportional increases in plasma exposure. Steady-state volume of distribution was 113 to 172 mL/kg, clearance was 2.7 to 3.0 mL/d/kg, and terminal half-life was 35 to 52 days. Plasma maximum observed concentration and the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time of Aß(1-x) and Aß(1-40) increased dose-dependently. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of ponezumab as a 10-minute infusion was safe and well tolerated and produced effects on plasma Aß species comparable with a 2-hour infusion. Shorter infusions may provide more flexibility, comfort, and convenience for patients and caregivers.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability following multiple oral doses of varenicline under various titration schedules in elderly nonsmokers.

This study was designed to investigate the multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the selective α4ß2 nicotinic acetylcholine partial agonist, varenicline, in elderly (65-85 years old) nonsmokers. Fifty male and female subjects with normal renal function for their age were randomized to receive varenicline or placebo once or twice daily for 3 weeks in an investigator- and subject-blinded parallel-group design. Treatment regimens included weekly titration (n = 14; days 1-7, 0.5 mg once daily; days 8-14, 0.5 mg twice daily; days 15-21, 1 mg twice daily); 2-week twice-daily titration (n = 13; days 1-14, 0.5 mg once daily; days 15-21, 0.5 mg twice daily); 2-week once-daily titration (n = 13; days 1-14, 0.5 mg once daily; days 15-21, 1 mg once daily); and placebo (n = 10). Approximate dose-proportional increases in systemic exposure of varenicline at steady state, based on maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the 24-hour period at steady state, were observed across the dose range of 0.5 to 2 mg/d. Median time to maximum concentration was 3 hours. Mean elimination half-life was estimated to be approximately 24 to 32 hours and independent of dose. Varenicline was considered to be safe and well tolerated in this elderly nonsmoking population.

A review of the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of varenicline for smoking cessation.

Varenicline tartrate (Chantix®/Champix®) is a selective partial agonist of the α(4)ß(2) nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and is approved as an aid to smoking cessation. The usual oral dosage in adults is 1 mg twice daily for 12 weeks, with an initial titration week. Several clinical pharmacology studies have characterized the pharmacokinetics of varenicline in adult smokers aged 18-55 years, elderly smokers and nonsmokers aged ≥ 65 years, adolescent smokers aged 12-17 years and subjects with impaired renal function. Varenicline exhibits linear pharmacokinetics following single- and multiple-dose administration of up to 3 mg/day. After oral administration absorption is virtually complete and systemic availability is high. Oral bioavailability is not affected by food or time-of-day dosing; maximum plasma drug concentrations typically occur within 3-4 hours after dosing. Protein binding of varenicline is low (≤ 20%) and independent of age and renal function. Varenicline is almost exclusively excreted unchanged in urine, primarily through glomerular filtration, with some component of active tubular secretion via human organic cation transporter, hOCT-2. Varenicline does not undergo significant metabolism and is not metabolized by hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. Consistent with an elimination half-life of ∼24 hours, steady-state conditions are reached within 4 days of repeat dosing. There are no remarkable differences between smokers and nonsmokers in metabolism or excretion of varenicline. In vitro, varenicline does not inhibit nor induce the activity of the major CYP enzymes. No clinically meaningful pharmacokinetic drug interactions are observed when varenicline is coadministered with the narrow therapeutic index drugs warfarin or digoxin, the smoking cessation therapies bupropion or transdermal nicotine, and the renally secreted drugs cimetidine or metformin. An integrated model-based analysis of varenicline pharmacokinetics across several studies in adult smokers further showed that renal function was the clinically important factor leading to interindividual variability in systemic exposure to varenicline. Although no dose adjustment is required for subjects with mild to moderate renal impairment, a dose reduction to 1 mg/day is indicated for subjects with severe renal insufficiency. After accounting for renal function, there was no apparent effect of age, sex or race on varenicline pharmacokinetics. Varenicline pharmacokinetics in adolescents were generally comparable to those in adults; the bodyweight effect, which resulted in greater exposure in individuals of smaller body size (weighing ≤ 55 kg), was adequately offset by administration of half the dose recommended in adults. (It is, however, important to note that varenicline is currently not approved for use in smokers aged under 18 years). Exposure-response analyses relating individual-specific drug exposure to clinical responses consistently showed that the end-of-treatment abstinence rate in adult smokers increased linearly with increasing varenicline exposure; the 1 mg twice-daily dose regimen was reliably associated with greater exposure and an increased probability of achieving a stable quit within 1 year from the start of treatment. Nausea was the single most frequently reported adverse event in varenicline clinical trials, with an incidence that was sex-related and increased with varenicline exposure. In all, the predictable pharmacokinetic properties and straightforward dispositional profile of varenicline simplify its use in clinical practice.

Increase in tiagabine serum concentration with coadministration of gemfibrozil.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of possible acute tiagabine toxicity secondary to administration of gemfibrozil. CASE SUMMARY: A 39-year-old male was taking tiagabine 16 mg orally 3 times per day and carbamazepine 500 mg orally twice per day for complex partial seizures secondary to mesial temporal sclerosis. He was found to have type IV hypertriglyceridemia and was prescribed gemfibrozil. Because he reported severe confusion and altered consciousness shortly after a single 600-mg dose of gemfibrozil, he was admitted for controlled challenge with that drug. A single 300-mg dose of gemfibrozil resulted in lightheadedness and led to a 59% and 75% increase in total tiagabine serum concentrations at 2 and 5 hours, respectively, without significant change in baseline carbamazepine concentrations. DISCUSSION: This is the first report of an interaction between the widely used antihyperlipidemic drug gemfibrozil and tiagabine. Since tiagabine, which was originally developed as an antiepileptic medication, is now being used widely for a variety of other indications such as anxiety and depression, there is an increased risk for clinically significant interactions with gemfibrozil. CONCLUSIONS: Increased total and unbound tiagabine concentrations following a single 300-mg dose of gemfibrozil and reproduction of clinical symptoms with gemfibrozil rechallenge suggests the toxicity our patient experienced was due to a pharmacokinetic drug interaction. Use of the Horn Drug Interaction Probability Scale showed a probable interaction between gemfibrozil and tiagabine.

Metabolism and disposition of a gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor partial agonist in humans.

The metabolism and disposition of N-[3-fluoro-4-[2-(propylamino)ethoxy]phenyl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-4-oxo-1H-indole-3-carboxamide (1), a potent subtype-selective partial agonist at the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor complex, were elucidated in humans following a p.o. dose of N-[3-fluoro-4-[2-(propylamino)ethoxy]phenyl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-4-oxo-1H-[3-(14)C]indole-3-carboxamide monomethane-sulfonate ([(14)C]1). Overall, 1 was well tolerated, with approximately twice as much radioactivity excreted in feces (64.8 +/- 13.3%) as in urine (28.4 +/- 8.8%). Across subjects, the oral clearance of 1 was composed of both renal (10%) and metabolic (< or =90%) components, with the biotransformation of 1 happening predominately via oxidative deamination to either 2-fluoro-4-[(4-oxo-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-indole-3-carbonyl)-amino]-phenoxy acetic acid (2) or 4-oxo-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-indole-3-carboxylic acid [3-fluoro-4-(2-hydroxy-ethoxy)-phenyl]-amide (3) and minimally by aliphatic hydroxylation and carbamate formation. Active renal secretion of 1 was observed as its unbound renal clearance was 6-fold greater than the glomerular filtration rate. Experiments using human hepatic in vitro systems were undertaken to better understand the enzyme(s) involved in the clinically observed oxidative biotransformation pathways. N-Dealkylation of 1, the principal metabolic route observed in vivo, was found to be predominately monoamine oxidase-B-mediated with the resulting putative aldehyde intermediate undergoing subsequent oxidation to 2 or reduction to 3.

Lack of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between a smoking cessation therapy, varenicline, and warfarin: an in vivo and in vitro study.

This study investigated the effect of varenicline on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of warfarin in 24 adult smokers and compared these findings with data generated using human in vitro systems. Subjects were randomized to receive varenicline 1 mg twice a day or placebo for 13 days and then switched to the alternative treatment after a 1-week washout period. A single dose of warfarin 25 mg was given on day 8 of each treatment period, and serial blood samples were collected over 144 hours postdose. Pharmacokinetic parameters for both (R)- and (S)-warfarin and international normalized ratio (INR) values were determined. Varenicline was assessed as an inhibitor and inducer of human cytochrome P450 activities using liver microsomes and hepatocytes, respectively. Consistent with the in vitro data, no alteration in human pharmacokinetics of warfarin enantiomers was observed with varenicline treatment. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of area under the concentration-time curve from zero hours to infinity and peak plasma concentrations were completely contained within 80% to 125%. Warfarin pharmacodynamic parameters, maximum INR, and the area under the prothrombin (INR)-time curve, were also unaffected by steady-state varenicline. Concomitant administration of varenicline and warfarin was well tolerated. Consequently, warfarin can be safely administered with varenicline without the need for dose adjustment.

Displacement of serotonin and dopamine transporters by venlafaxine extended release capsule at steady state: a [123I]2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-(4-iodophenyl)-tropane single photon emission computed tomography imaging study.

Both positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies suggest that saturation of serotonin transporters (SERT) is present during treatment with therapeutic doses of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors also appear to increase the availability of dopamine transporters (DAT). The current study measured SERT occupancy and modulation of DAT by the serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) venlafaxine using [123I]2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-(4-iodophenyl)-tropane SPECT. Eight healthy subjects were administered open-label venlafaxine extended release capsules (75 mg/d for 4 days followed by 150 mg/d for 5 days). Venlafaxine significantly inhibited [123I]beta-CIT binding to SERT in the brainstem (55.4%) and the diencephalon (54.1%). In contrast, venlafaxine increased [123I]beta-CIT binding to DAT in the striatum (10.1%) after 5 days of administration of 150 mg/d. The displacement of [123I]beta-CIT from brain SERT and the increase in striatal [123I]beta-CIT binding to DAT appear similar to previous work with the SSRI citalopram (40 mg/d). A literature review of SERT occupancy by marketed SSRIs and the SNRI venlafaxine using SPECT ([123I]beta-CIT) or positron emission tomography ([11C](N, N-Dimethyl-2-(2-amino-4-cyanophenylthio)-benzylamine) imaging suggests that therapeutic doses of SNRI are associated with virtual saturation of the serotonin transporter.

Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of the selective nicotinic receptor partial agonist, varenicline, in healthy smokers.

Varenicline is a novel and selective alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist developed for smoking cessation. The primary objectives of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study were to determine the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of multiple oral doses of varenicline given as tablets once (1 mg, 2 mg, and 3 mg) or twice (1 mg) daily to healthy adult smokers. Within each dose level, 8 subjects were randomized to varenicline and 4 subjects to placebo. Varenicline was well tolerated at doses up to and including 2 mg daily. Dose-proportional increases in maximum observed plasma concentrations and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval values were observed between the 1-mg and 2-mg daily doses of varenicline. Once- and twice-daily dosing resulted, on average, in an approximate 2- and 3-fold increase in varenicline systemic exposure, respectively, compared with single dose. There was no evidence of concentration- or time-dependent changes in the pharmacokinetics of varenicline upon repeat dosing.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability after single and multiple oral doses of varenicline in elderly smokers.

Varenicline is a novel selective alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine partial agonist developed for smoking cessation. This study investigated the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of varenicline in elderly (> or = 65 years) smokers. Twenty-four elderly smokers with normal renal function for their age (estimated creatinine clearance > or = 70 mL/min) received varenicline 1 mg once daily (n = 8) or placebo (n = 4) for 7 days, or 1 mg twice daily (n = 8) or placebo (n = 4) for 6 days with a single dose on day 7 in a double-blind, parallel group and placebo-controlled design. There was no evidence of concentration- or time-dependent changes in varenicline pharmacokinetics upon repeat dosing. Once- and twice-daily dosing was associated with an approximate 2-fold and 3-fold increase, respectively, in systemic exposure to varenicline. Varenicline was well tolerated; all adverse events reported were mild to moderate in intensity. Thus, no dose adjustment is necessary based on age alone.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of varenicline, a selective nicotinic receptor partial agonist, in healthy smokers and nonsmokers.

Varenicline is a novel and selective alpha4beta2 nicotinic receptor partial agonist that is under development for smoking cessation. The primary objectives of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, dose-escalation study were to determine the clinical pharmacology of single doses of varenicline in healthy smokers and nonsmokers under fed and fasted conditions and to determine the clinical pharmacology of varenicline administered in the morning and in the evening to smokers. Within each subject group, 4 subjects were randomized to varenicline and 2 subjects to placebo. Subjects received one single oral administration of varenicline or placebo: 6 doses (0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 mg) were investigated in nonsmokers and 7 doses in smokers (0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, and 10.0 mg). Varenicline was well tolerated after single doses up to 3.0 mg in smokers and 1.0 mg in nonsmokers. Nausea and vomiting at doses above 3.0 mg in smokers and 1.0 mg in nonsmokers were dose limiting. Systemic exposure to varenicline and pharmacokinetic variability were similar between smokers and nonsmokers. Coadministration with food, smoking restriction, and time-of-day dosing did not affect the pharmacokinetics of varenicline.

Retrospective evaluation of commonly used equations to predict energy expenditure in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine which of four commonly used equations to estimate energy expenditure is precise and unbiased compared with energy expenditure as measured by indirect calorimetry. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. SETTING: Adult medical intensive care unit in a research hospital of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. PATIENTS: Seventy-six adult, mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients. INTERVENTION: Indirect calorimetry reports generated by the National Institutes of Health Critical Care Medicine Department's Metabolic Cart Consult Service were reviewed. Bias and precision of resting energy expenditure (REE) estimated by equations were computed using mean prediction error (ME) and root mean squared prediction error (MSE). Equations were considered precise if the 95% confidence interval for MSE was within 15% of the measured energy expenditure (MEE) determined by indirect calorimetry. Equations were considered unbiased if the 95% confidence interval for ME included zero. Paired t tests were used to compare estimated REE values for each predictive equation with MEE values determined by indirect calorimetry. Data were stratified into regions of bias using classification and regression tree analysis, as well as visual inspection of estimated REE-versus-MEE curves for each equation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The Harris-Benedict equation multiplied by an activity factor of 1.2 was unbiased and precise. The Ireton-Jones equation was precise but biased. The American College of Chest Physicians' consensus recommendation was biased and imprecise. The Harris-Benedict equation without an activity factor also demonstrated bias and imprecision. CONCLUSIONS: The Harris-Benedict equation multiplied by an activity factor of 1.2 is suitable for predicting REE and may be used in the absence of indirect calorimetry.

Plasma pharmacokinetics of sulfadiazine administered twice daily versus four times daily are similar in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.

The pharmacokinetics of 2,000 mg of sulfadiazine administered twice daily (BID) versus those of 1,000 mg administered four times a day were compared in eight human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. No differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were detected between the regimens. These data provide a pharmacokinetic rationale for BID dosing of sulfadiazine for the treatment and suppression of toxoplasmosis.

Cytochrome P450 3A4 activity after surgical stress.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the acute inflammatory response after surgical trauma and changes in hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4 activity, compare changes in cytochrome P450 3A4 activity after procedures with varying degrees of surgical stress, and to explore the time course of any potential drug-cytokine interaction after surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label study with each patient serving as his or her own control. SETTING: University-affiliated, acute care, general hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 16 patients scheduled for elective repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 5), complete or partial colectomy (n = 6), or peripheral vascular surgery with graft (n = 5). INTERVENTIONS: Cytochrome P450 3A4 activity was estimated using the carbon-14 [14C]erythromycin breath test (ERMBT) before surgery and 24, 48, and 72 hrs after surgery. Abdominal aortic aneurysm and colectomy patients also had an ERMBT performed at discharge. Blood samples were obtained before surgery, immediately after surgery, and 6, 24, 32, 48, and 72 hrs after surgery for determination of plasma concentrations of interleukin-6, interleukin-1beta, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Clinical markers of surgical stress that were collected included duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, and volume of fluids administered in the operating room. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: ERMBT results significantly declined in all three surgical groups, with the lowest value at the time of the 72-hr study in all three groups. There was a trend toward differences in ERMBT results among groups that did not reach statistical significance (p =.06). The nadir ERMBT result was significantly and negatively correlated with both peak interleukin-6 concentration (r(s) = -.541, p =.03) and log interleukin-6 area under the curve from 0 to 72 hrs (r(s) = -.597, p =.014). Subjects with a peak interleukin-6 of >100 pg/mL had a significantly lower nadir ERMBT compared with subjects with a peak interleukin-6 of <100 pg/mL (35.5% +/- 5.2% vs. 74.7% +/- 5.1%, p <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Acute inflammation after elective surgery was associated with a significant decline in cytochrome P450 3A4 activity, which is predictive of clinically important changes in the metabolism of commonly used drugs that are substrates for this enzyme.

Effect of milk thistle on the pharmacokinetics of indinavir in healthy volunteers.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To characterize the pharmacokinetics of indinavir in the presence and absence of milk thistle and to determine the offset of any effect of milk thistle on indinavir disposition. DESIGN: Prospective open-label drug interaction study. SETTING: Outpatient clinic. SUBJECTS: Ten healthy volunteers. Intervention. Blood samples were collected over 8 hours after the volunteers took four doses of indinavir 800 mg every 8 hours on an empty stomach for baseline pharmacokinetics. This dosing and sampling were repeated after the subjects took milk thistle 175 mg (confirmed to contain silymarin 153 mg, the active ingredient) 3 times/day for 3 weeks. After an 11-day washout, indinavir dosing and blood sampling were repeated to evaluate the offset of any potential interaction. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Indinavir concentrations were measured by using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were determined: highest concentration (Cmax), hour-0 concentration, hour-8 concentration (C8), time to reach Cmax, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the 8-hour dosing interval (AUC8). Milk thistle did not alter significantly the overall exposure of indinavir, as evidenced by a 9% reduction in the indinavir AUC8 after 3 weeks of dosing with milk thistle, although the least squares mean trough level (C8) was significantly decreased by 25%. CONCLUSION: Milk thistle in commonly administered dosages should not interfere with indinavir therapy in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.

Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input.

In humans, somatosensory stimulation results in increased corticomotoneuronal excitability to the stimulated body parts. The purpose of this study was to investigate the underlying mechanisms. We recorded motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), first dorsal interosseous (FDI), and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles. MEP amplitudes, recruitment curves (RC), intracortical inhibition (ICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), resting (rMT) and active motor thresholds (aMT) were recorded before and after a 2-h period of ulnar nerve electrical stimulation at the wrist. Somatosensory input was monitored by recording somatosensory evoked potentials. To differentiate excitability changes at cortical vs. subcortical sites, we recorded supramaximal peripheral M-responses and MEPs to brainstem electrical stimulation (BES). In order to investigate the involvement of GABAergic mechanisms, we studied the influence of lorazepam (LZ) (a GABA(A) receptor agonist) relative to that of dextromethorphan (DM) (an NMDA receptor antagonist) and placebo in a double-blind design. We found that somatosensory stimulation increased MEP amplitudes to TMS only in the ADM, confirming a previous report. This effect was blocked by LZ but not by either DM or placebo and lasted between 8 and 20 min in the absence of (i) changes in MEPs elicited by BES, (ii) amplitudes of early somatosensory-evoked potentials or (iii) M-responses. We conclude that somatosensory stimulation elicited a focal increase in corticomotoneuronal excitability that outlasts the stimulation period and probably occurs at cortical sites. The antagonistic effect of LZ supports the hypothesis of GABAergic involvement as an operating mechanism.

Herb-drug interactions and confounding in clinical trials.

Herb-drug interactions are being recognized for their potential to reduce the efficacy of, or cause additive side effects with, conventional medications. Herb use, particularly when undisclosed to investigators, may be a potential unforeseen confounding variable in clinical trials. The use of herbal products by patients enrolled in clinical trials should be determined and considered as a confounding variable.

The effect of garlic supplements on the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir.

Herbal therapies are widely used, but there are few data on their interactions with conventional medications. This study evaluated the effect of garlic supplements on the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir. Ten healthy volunteers received 10 doses of saquinavir (Fortovase) at a dosage of 1200 mg 3 times daily with meals for 4 days on study days 1-4, 22-25, and 36-39, and they received a total of 41 doses of garlic caplets taken 2 times daily on study days 5-25. Blood samples were obtained on study days 4, 25, and 39 for determination of saquinavir plasma pharmacokinetic parameters. In the presence of garlic, the mean saquinavir area under the curve (AUC) during the 8-h dosing interval decreased by 51%, trough levels at 8 h after dosing decreased by 49%, and the mean maximum concentrations (Cmax) decreased by 54%. After the 10-day washout period, the AUC, trough, and Cmax values returned to 60%-70% of their values at baseline. Patients should use caution when combining garlic supplements with saquinavir when it is used as a sole protease inhibitor.