Adenotonsillectomy for sleep-disordered breathing in a predominantly obese pediatric population.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of adenotonsillectomy (T&A) in the treatment of pediatric sleep-disordered breathing, and to determine the natural history in untreated children. METHODS: The charts of children aged 1-12 who underwent polysomnography (PSG) between 1/2006 and 6/2009 were reviewed to identify children with positive studies. Children not treated by T&A were recruited and matched by age, time since initial PSG, and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to children who underwent T&A. All participants were evaluated by a clinical assessment score (CAS-15), follow-up PSG, and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). RESULTS: Sixteen matched pairs completed the study. Ten (63%) T&A patients were overweight or obese compared with 14 (88%) untreated patients. There was a greater median improvement in AHI in the surgical group compared to the nonsurgical group (10.3 vs. 6.5, p=0.044). Although the T&A children were more likely to have a follow-up AHI<5 (81% vs. 69%) and <1 (44% vs. 25%), these results were not significant. The T&A group had significantly lower mean (SD) scores on the CAS-15 [8.9(6.1) vs. 29.4(16.2), p<0.001] and the CBCL total problem score [43.9(8.7) vs. 58.9(13.0), p<0.001]. Younger age at presentation (rho=-0.76, p<0.001), initial AHI (0.87, p<0.001), and initial AI (0.63, p=0.05) were correlated with change in AHI among T&A subjects. CONCLUSIONS: T&A was more effective in reducing AHI than no surgery. Median AHI improved in the nonsurgical group, and 4/16 (25%) untreated patients were cured (AHI<1).

Vertical incision intraoral silicone chin augmentation.

OBJECTIVE: Solid silicone augmentation mentoplasty is a common procedure with consistent aesthetic results in properly selected patients. While many plastic surgeons employ the external approach, the intraoral method affords excellent aesthetic outcomes while avoiding an external scar. This is the largest series in the literature describing the midline intraoral incision approach with minimal disruption of soft tissues. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Academic medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-five patients underwent chin augmentation with solid silicone implants between 2004 and 2010. Among these implants, 105 were placed transorally. Eighty-five patients were followed for at least 1 year. Demographic information, indications, patient satisfaction questionnaire results, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: All implants yielded satisfactory results with no displacement, infection, tissue reaction, lower lip incompetence, mental nerve injury, or intraoral implant contamination. Two cases of superficial mucosal irritation at the suture site were observed and resolved without consequence. Symmetry, projection, and overall balance of facial components were excellent. Although all patients were satisfied with the functional and aesthetic results, 20% stated they would like further augmentation. Patients were extremely satisfied with the lack of an external scar. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our series, the intraoral technique with a midline incision avoiding disruption of the mentalis muscle is recommended for its ease, simplicity, patient satisfaction, low complication rate, and circumvention of an external scar. The external approach should be considered in cases that require a very large implant.

Do abstracts in otolaryngology journals report study findings accurately?

OBJECTIVES: Although published abstracts have the advantage of being prominent and concise, their quality in the otolaryngology literature has not been studied. We sought to understand the limitations of relying on abstracts as the sole source of information about published research. In addition, we sought to identify specific opportunities for improving the quality of published articles and their associated abstracts. METHODS: Studies of original research published in four major otolaryngology journals from January 2008 to June 2008 were included. Each study article and abstract was reviewed separately for 12 domains relating to study design, results, and conclusions. Good inter-rater reliability was established as part of the validation process. RESULTS: Four hundred eighteen articles were identified for study, which included 75 percent clinical research and 25 percent basic science. The most common omissions in the abstract when compared with the complete article were study limitations (91% left out of abstract), geographic location (79%), confidence intervals (75%), dropouts or losses (62%), and harms and adverse events (44%). Conversely, the abstract often included information about research design (99%), sample size (92%), source of the data (81%), and quantitative results (67%). These results did not differ significantly with regard to article type, journal, or level of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Readers of otolaryngology journals may form biased or inappropriate conclusions if they read only the abstract of a study, particularly with regard to study limitations, adverse events, and subject dropouts or losses. These results highlight the perils of using the abstract as a sole source of information.

Excision of laryngocele via transcervical midline approach.

Acute airway obstruction in the adult can be caused by a rapidly enlarging laryngeal cyst that may present unusually as a midline neck mass. In this case report we present a different surgical technique for the removal of a large combined laryngocele via midline transcervical approach that did not require laryngofissure. This technique allowed simple and fast access, excellent exposure and complete removal of the lesion without resection of thyroid cartilage or associated morbidities.