Value, transparency, and inclusion: A values-based study of patient involvement in musculoskeletal research.

BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement work (PPI) is essential to good research practice. Existing research indicates that PPI offers benefits to research design, conduct, communication, and implementation of findings. Understanding how PPI works and its value helps to provide information about best practice and highlight areas for further development. This study used a values-based approach to reporting PPI at a Research Unit focused on musculoskeletal conditions within a UK medical school. METHODS: The study was conducted between October 2019 and January 2020 using Gradinger's value system framework as a theoretical basis. The framework comprises three value systems each containing five clusters. All PPI members and researchers who had attended PPI groups were invited to participate. Participants completed a structured questionnaire based on the value system framework; PPI members also provided further information through telephone interviews. Data were deductively analysed using a framework approach with data mapped onto value systems. RESULTS: Twelve PPI members and 17 researchers took part. Views about PPI activity mapped onto all three value systems. PPI members felt empowered to provide their views, and that their opinions were valued by researchers. It was important to PPI members that they were able to 'give back' and to do something positive with their experiences. Researchers would have liked the groups to be more representative of the wider population, patients highlighted that groups could include more younger members. Researchers recognised the value of PPI, and the study highlighted areas where researchers members might benefit from further awareness. CONCLUSIONS: Three areas for development were identified: (i) facilitating researcher engagement in training about the value and importance of PPI in research; (ii) support for researchers to reflect on the role that PPI plays in transparency of healthcare research; (iii) work to further explore and address aspects of diversity and inclusion in PPI.

An observational cohort study to produce and evaluate an improved tool to screen older women with back pain for osteoporotic vertebral fractures (Vfrac): study protocol.

The aim of this study is to produce an easy to use checklist for general practitioners to complete whenever a woman aged over 65 years with back pain seeks healthcare. This checklist will produce a binary output to determine if the patient should have a radiograph to diagnose vertebral fracture. PURPOSE: People with osteoporotic vertebral fractures are important to be identified as they are at relatively high risk of further fractures. Despite this, less than a third of people with osteoporotic vertebral fractures come to clinical attention due to various reasons including lack of clear triggers to identify who should have diagnostic spinal radiographs. This study aims to produce and evaluate a novel screening tool (Vfrac) for use in older women presenting with back pain in primary care based on clinical triggers and predictors identified previously. This tool will generate a binary output to determine if a radiograph is required. METHODS: The Vfrac study is a two-site, pragmatic, observational cohort study recruiting 1633 women aged over 65 years with self-reported back pain. Participants will be recruited from primary care in two sites. The Vfrac study will use data from two self-completed questionnaires, a simple physical examination, a lateral thoracic and lateral lumbar radiograph and information contained in medical records. RESULTS: The primary objective is to develop an easy-to-use clinical screening tool for identifying older women who are likely to have vertebral fractures. CONCLUSIONS: This article describes the protocol of the Vfrac study; ISRCTN16550671.

An exploratory study of the association between reactive attachment disorder and attachment narratives in early school-age children.

OBJECTIVE: To explore attachment narratives in children diagnosed with reactive attachment disorder (RAD). METHOD: We compared attachment narratives, as measured by the Manchester Child Attachment Story Task, in a group of 33 children with a diagnosis of RAD and 37 comparison children. RESULTS: The relative risk (RR) for children with RAD having an insecure attachment pattern was 2.4 (1.4-4.2) but 30% were rated as securely attached. Within the RAD group, children with a clear history of maltreatment were more likely to be Insecure-Disorganised than children without a clear history of maltreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Reactive attachment disorder is not the same as attachment insecurity, and questions remain about how attachment research informs clinical research on attachment disorders.

At HOME in Scotland: validation of the home observation for measurement of the environment inventory.

BACKGROUND: This study used the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) Inventory to measure aspects of the quality and quantity of psychological stimulation and cognitive support available in the home environment of a sample of Scottish children and to examine the effectiveness of this measure in a British context. METHODS: Forty-seven families who had previously attended parent-training programmes at family centres were assessed. The Middle Childhood (MC) and Early Adolescent (EA) version of the HOME were used with children aged between 8 and 13 years old. Measures of family adversity were also taken. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the demographics of the MC-HOME and EA-HOME groups nor in their total HOME scores. Total HOME scores were compared with independent measures of family adversity. The results of the MC-HOME and the EA-HOME were similar to results reported for socially deprived American samples. DISCUSSION: This Scottish sample had similar MC-HOME and EA-HOME scores as previously reported in American samples and the HOME scores related strongly to family adversity, supplying a proximal link between social conditions and the environment of children. These results suggest that the HOME Inventory is reliable and has concurrent validity with measures of social adversity in a British sample.

Fifteen years experience of penile prosthesis insertion.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To review the outcome and patient satisfaction of penile prosthesis insertion over a 15 y period. PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the notes of 172 patients who underwent penile prosthesis insertion between January 1980 and May 1995. From the notes information was determined on age of the patient, type of prosthesis, surgical approach and length of stay. Also noted were risk factors for erectile dysfunction and the aetiology. Twenty patients were known to have died or moved away. To assess the impact the operation had on quality of life, 152 questionnaires were sent of which 103 were returned (67%). The questionnaire gained information about sexual activity, before and after the operation and the overall satisfaction of the patient and his partner and whether they felt the operation was a success. RESULTS: Overall 149 patients were known to have had malleable prostheses inserted and 23 had inflatables. The commonest organic groups were vascular disease, diabetes and Peyronies disease. Fifteen patients had two procedures. Four patients required revision of the prosthesis due to erosion, and there was one death due to pulmonary embolism. One hundred and three completed questionnaires have been returned to date the median time since operation was 4 y, the range being six months to 16 y and 78% thought the operation was a success. CONCLUSIONS: The insertion of malleable prostheses is associated with low complication rates, good patient satisfaction and improved quality of life for the couple. Concealment was not a major problem.