A prospective study to validate the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRI)-induced dermatologic toxicities FACT-EGFRI 18 questionnaire: SWOG S1013.

BACKGROUND: Papulopustular rash is a common class effect of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRI) that can affect patients' health-related quality of life and cause disruptions to treatment. SWOG S1013 (NCT01416688) is a multi-center study designed to validate the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy EGFRI 18 (FACT-EGFRI 18) using 7-items from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 to assess EGFRI-induced skin-related toxicities and their impact on functional status. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of colorectal or lung cancer to receive EGFRI therapies for at least 6 weeks were enrolled. Patient self-assessments using the FACT-EGFRI 18 were completed prior to undergoing CTCAE assessment by trained clinicians at baseline, weekly × 6, and then monthly × 3. The psychometric properties of the FACT-EGFRI 14 (skin toxicity items only) and 18 (plus 2 nail and 2 hair items) were established based on criterion validity, known groups validity, internal consistency reliability, and responsiveness to change. RESULTS: Of the 146 registered patients, 124 were evaluable. High Cronbach's alpha (> 0.70) for both FACT-EGFRI 14 and FACT-EGFRI 18 scores across assessment times were observed. Although agreement (i.e. criterion validity) between individual and summary scales of the FACT-EGFRI 18 for assessing skin toxicity was good, agreement with the clinician-reported CTCAE was only fair. The minimal important difference was determined to be 3 points. The results also demonstrated responsiveness to symptom change. DISCUSSION: Based on the results of this multi-center validation study, the FACT-EGFRI 18 patient-reported outcome instrument provided data from the patient's perspective yielding unique information as well as complementing clinician-rated CTCAE grades, especially for the symptoms of pain, pruritus, and paronychia. CONCLUSIONS: Good to excellent psychometric properties for the FACT-EGFRI 18 were demonstrated, supporting further use of this patient-reported outcomes measure. Additional validation with a more diverse group of patients should be conducted.

Integrated Approach Reveals Role of Mitochondrial Germ-Line Mutation F18L in Respiratory Chain, Oxidative Alterations, Drug Sensitivity, and Patient Prognosis in Glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma is the most common and malignant primary brain tumour in adults, with a dismal prognosis. This is partly due to considerable inter- and intra-tumour heterogeneity. Changes in the cellular energy-producing mitochondrial respiratory chain complex (MRC) activities are a hallmark of glioblastoma relative to the normal brain, and associate with differential survival outcomes. Targeting MRC complexes with drugs can also facilitate anti-glioblastoma activity. Whether mutations in the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) that encode several components of the MRC contribute to these phenomena remains underexplored. We identified a germ-line mtDNA mutation (m. 14798T > C), enriched in glioblastoma relative to healthy controls, that causes an amino acid substitution F18L within the core mtDNA-encoded cytochrome b subunit of MRC complex III. F18L is predicted to alter corresponding complex III activity, and sensitivity to complex III-targeting drugs. This could in turn alter reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, cell behaviour and, consequently, patient outcomes. Here we show that, despite a heterogeneous mitochondrial background in adult glioblastoma patient biopsy-derived cell cultures, the F18L substitution associates with alterations in individual MRC complex activities, in particular a 75% increase in MRC complex II_III activity, and a 34% reduction in CoQ10, the natural substrate for MRC complex III, levels. Downstream characterisation of an F18L-carrier revealed an 87% increase in intra-cellular ROS, an altered cellular distribution of mitochondrial-specific ROS, and a 64% increased sensitivity to clomipramine, a repurposed MRC complex III-targeting drug. In patients, F18L-carriers that received the current standard of care treatment had a poorer prognosis than non-carriers (373 days vs. 415 days, respectively). Single germ-line mitochondrial mutations could predispose individuals to differential prognoses, and sensitivity to mitochondrial targeted drugs. Thus, F18L, which is present in blood could serve as a useful non-invasive biomarker for the stratification of patients into prognostically relevant groups, one of which requires a lower dose of clomipramine to achieve clinical effect, thus minimising side-effects.

Prevalence of Hepatitis B Virus, Hepatitis C Virus, and HIV Infection Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cancer From Academic and Community Oncology Practices.

IMPORTANCE: Universal screening of patients with newly diagnosed cancer for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and HIV is not routine in oncology practice, and experts disagree about whether universal screening should be performed. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of HBV, HCV, and HIV infection among persons with newly diagnosed cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter prospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed cancer (ie, identified within 120 days of cancer diagnosis) at 9 academic and 9 community oncology institutions affiliated with SWOG (formerly the Southwest Oncology Group) Cancer Research Network, a member of the National Clinical Trials Network, with enrollment from August 29, 2013, through February 15, 2017. The data analysis was conducted using data available through August 17, 2017. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The accrual goal was 3000 patients and the primary end point was the presence of HBV infection (previous or chronic), HCV infection, or HIV infection at enrollment. Patients with previous knowledge of infection as well as patients with unknown viral viral status were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 3092 registered patients, 3051 were eligible and evaluable. Median (range) age was 60.6 (18.2-93.7) years, 1842 (60.4%) were female, 553 (18.1%) were black, and 558 (18.3%) were Hispanic ethnicity. Screened patients had similar clinical and demographic characteristics compared with those registered. The observed infection rate for previous HBV infection was 6.5% (95% CI, 5.6%-7.4%; n = 197 of 3050 patients); chronic HBV, 0.6% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.0%; n = 19 of 3050 patients); HCV, 2.4% (95% CI, 1.9%-3.0%; n = 71 of 2990 patients); and HIV, 1.1% (95% CI, 0.8%-1.6%; n = 34 of 3045). Among those with viral infections, 8 patients with chronic HBV (42.1%; 95% CI, 20.3%-66.5%), 22 patients with HCV (31.0%; 95% CI, 20.5%-43.1%), and 2 patients with HIV (5.9%; 95% CI, 0.7%-19.7%) were newly diagnosed through the study. Among patients with infections, 4 patients with chronic HBV (21.1%; 95% CI, 6.1%-45.6%), 23 patients with HCV (32.4%; 95% CI, 21.8%-44.5%), and 7 patients with HIV (20.6%; 95% CI, 8.7%-37.9%) had no identifiable risk factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results of this study found that a substantial proportion of patients with newly diagnosed cancer and concurrent HBV or HCV are unaware of their viral infection at the time of cancer diagnosis, and many had no identifiable risk factors for infection. Screening patients with cancer to identify HBV and HCV infection before starting treatment may be warranted to prevent viral reactivation and adverse clinical outcomes. The low rate of undiagnosed HIV infection may not support universal screening of newly diagnosed cancer patients.

Utility of routine pretreatment evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction in breast cancer patients receiving anthracyclines.

Anthracycline-based chemotherapy is widely used in the management of breast cancer. Despite the lack of clinical evidence, obtaining prechemotherapy left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by echocardiogram or multigated acquisition scan is a widely adopted practice throughout the world. We present here the results of a retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients who had LVEF measurements in anticipation of an anthracycline chemotherapy to determine whether predefined cardiac risk factors predicted for poor cardiac function. Retrospective data were analyzed from 482 female breast cancer patients in whom LVEF was measured before starting anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Baseline demographics and multiple risk factors associated with congestive heart failure were collected. Twenty-six possible risk factors for CHF were defined, and the frequency of finding an abnormal LVEF as a function of total risk factors was assessed. Statistical tests include chi-squared and logistic regression analysis. The median age of the study population was 52 years. The original chemotherapy plan was changed in 7 patients (1.45%) based on LVEF findings, all of which had asymptomatic LV dysfunction (LVEF ranging 40%-50%). In 32 patients, despite normal LVEF results, anthracyclines were omitted secondary to prior cardiac issues. In 17 patients where LVEF was reported normal, anthracyclines were skipped based on patient's preference, tumor characteristics, or upstaging of the cancer based on imaging studies. No patient with ≤2 risk factors had an abnormal LVEF (N = 350). The probability of finding an abnormal LVEF in patients without any cardiac risk factors is extremely rare. Skipping baseline LVEF assessment may be an option in some patients with no cardiac risk factors undergoing anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Randomized, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Duloxetine Versus Placebo for Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgias in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: SWOG S1202.

Purpose Adherence to aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy for early-stage breast cancer is limited by AI-associated musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS). Duloxetine is US Food and Drug Administration approved for treatment of multiple chronic pain disorders. We hypothesized that treatment of AIMSS with duloxetine would improve average joint pain compared with placebo. Methods This randomized, double-blind, phase III trial included AI-treated postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer and who had average joint pain score of ≥ 4 out of 10 that developed or worsened since AI therapy initiation. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to duloxetine or placebo for 13 weeks. The primary end point was average joint pain through 12 weeks, examined using multivariable linear mixed models, adjusted for stratification factors (baseline pain score of 4 to 6 v 7 to 10 and prior taxane use). Clinically significant change in average pain was defined as a ≥ 2-point decrease from baseline. Results Of 299 enrolled patients, 127 patients treated with duloxetine and 128 who received placebo were evaluable for the primary analysis. By 12 weeks, the average joint pain score was 0.82 points lower for patients who received duloxetine compared with those who received placebo (95% CI, -1.24 to -0.40; P = .0002). Similar patterns were observed for worst joint pain, joint stiffness, pain interference, and functioning. Rates of adverse events of any grade were higher in the duloxetine-treated group (78% v 50%); rates of grade 3 adverse events were similar. Conclusion Results of treatment with duloxetine for AIMSS were superior to those of placebo among women with early-stage breast cancer, although it resulted in more frequent low-grade toxicities.

Excellent response to chemotherapy post immunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors has changed the landscape of cancer treatment. Newer monoclonal antibodies are coming up and are being tested in various cancers during different stages of treatment. With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the management of various types of cancers, the question is raised as to what next can be offered to a patient who has progressed on this newer treatment. Does Sequence matter? There have been reports of improved responses to chemotherapy after immunotherapy in the form of vaccines. Here we present a case series of 6 patients who progressed on immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors after initial modality of treatment (chemotherapy/radiation), subsequently received chemotherapy with excellent response. METHODS: We have a cohort of six patients who had disease progression on second line Immunotherapy for solid or hematological malignancies and had ECOG < 2. All these patients received third line salvage chemotherapy. Three patients had metastatic head and neck cancer, 2 had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and one had T -cell rich B- cell lymphoma. Prior review and approval were obtained from our institutional review board. RESULTS: All patients had an excellent response to chemotherapy in third line setting, after immune checkpoint inhibitors and most of them achieved a complete response. CONCLUSION: Targeting cancer with chemotherapy after failure of immunotherapy is a valid option and can lead to better response rates and PFS which may lead to OS. This effect may be secondary to immunotherapy removing the inhibition exerted by tumor cells or other immune cells initially followed by cytotoxic chemotherapy mediated killing of tumor cells.

Regression of a glioblastoma multiforme: spontaneous versus a potential antineoplastic effect of dexamethasone and levetiracetam.

Patients with grade IV astrocytoma or glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) have a median survival of <12 months, increased to 14.6 months by maximal safe resection with radiation and temozolamide. In the absence of chemotherapy, radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, spontaneous regression of GBM or regression while only being on dexamethasone (DEX) and levetiracetam (LEV) have seldom been reported. Here, we present a case of a patient who had significant regression of the GBM with DEX and LEV alone. In this study, we hypothesise a plausible antineoplastic role of DEX and or LEV in GBM and highlight molecular, preclinical and clinical studies supporting this role.

Effect of Postmastectomy Radiation on Survival of AJCC pN2/N3 Breast Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of postmastectomy radiation (PMRT) in breast cancer patients with N2 and N3 nodal status is often evaluated in combination with other postmastectomy adjuvant treatments. To account for interaction effects and determine the individual impact of PMRT alone, the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was analyzed from 2004-2011. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated a cohort of 38,442 women diagnosed with pathological stage N2/N3 breast cancer who underwent mastectomy between 2004 and 2011 from the NCDB. Overall survival was the outcome variable; primary predictor variable was treatment (PMRT, adjuvant anti-hormonal therapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy). Additional variables addressed and adjusted for included: age, race, Charlson Comorbidity index, education, income, payer status, distance traveled, facility type, diagnosing/treating facility, treatment delay, grade of tumor, tumor size, and stage at diagnosis, tumor histology, ER/PR status, and lymph node invasion as well as PMRT boost and dosage. Multivariate Cox regression was used to investigate the effect of PMRT on overall survival while adjusting for secondary predictive factors. RESULTS: The majority of patients received one or more postmastectomy procedures such as radiation (69.31%), chemotherapy (88.79%), and/or hormone therapy (62.66%). The median overall survival for all patients was 8.41 years. In multivariate analysis, effects of treatment on survival were significant for chemotherapy alone, hormonal therapy alone, and a combination of PMRT with either chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or both. Compared to patients without treatment, patients who received PMRT alone were not significantly associated with an increased risk of death; patients who received hormone therapy alone or chemotherapy alone had a reduced risk of death by 15% and 31%, respectively. With the combination of all three treatments, risk of death was reduced by 64%. CONCLUSION: PMRT was not found to be a significant predictor of risk of death for pN2/N3 breast cancer patients when adjusting for socioeconomic factors, disease characteristics, and interaction effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. The benefit of PMRT in addition to chemotherapy, hormonal therapy or both on overall survival seems to be marginal and not statistically significant.

Private Payer's Status Improves Male Breast Cancer Survival.

Survival from male breast cancer is influenced by many factors. This study assessed payer's status effect on survival of male breast cancer patients. This study included 8,828 male breast cancer patients diagnosed between 1998-2006 and followed to 2011 in the National Cancer Data Base. Cox regression was used to investigate the effect of payer's status and other factors on overall survival. Patients had 36.2%, 42.7%, 14.7%, and 6.5% of stage I to IV cancer, respectively. Payer status was private 47.7%, Medicare 42.6%, Medicaid 3.24%, unknown 3.59%, and uninsured 2.95%. Median overall survival (MOS) for all patients was 10.6 years. In multivariate analysis, Direct adjusted MOS was 12.46, 11.89, 9.99, 9.02, and 8.29 years for private, "unknown," Medicare, uninsured, and Medicaid payer's status, respectively. Patients with private and "unknown" payer's status showed a significant difference in survival compared to uninsured patients, while Medicaid and Medicare patients did not. Age, race, stage, grade, income, comorbidity, distance travelled, and diagnosing/treating facility were also significant predictors of survival. Treatment delay and cancer program did not have a significant influence on survival.

Effects of payer status on breast cancer survival: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer outcomes are influenced by multiple factors including access to care, and payer status is a recognized barrier to treatment access. To further define the influence of payer status on outcome, the National Cancer Data Base data from 1998-2006 was analyzed. METHOD: Data was analyzed from 976,178 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer registered in the National Cancer Data Base. Overall survival was the primary outcome variable while payer status was the primary predictor variable. Secondary predictor variables included stage, age, race, Charlson Comorbidity index, income, education, distance travelled, cancer program, diagnosing/treating facility, and treatment delay. Multivariate Cox regression was used to investigate the effect of payer status on overall survival while adjusting for secondary predictive factors. RESULTS: Uninsured (28.68%) and Medicaid (28.0%) patients had a higher percentage of patients presenting with stage III and stage IV cancer at diagnosis. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for secondary predictor variables, payer status was a statistically significant predictor of survival. Patients with private, unknown, or Medicare status showed a decreased risk of dying compared to uninsured, with a decrease of 36%, 22%, and 15% respectively. However, Medicaid patients had an increased risk of 11% compared to uninsured. The direct adjusted median overall survival was 14.92, 14.76, 14.56, 13.64, and 12.84 years for payer status of private, unknown, Medicare, uninsured, and Medicaid respectively. CONCLUSION: We observed that patients with no insurance or Medicaid were most likely to be diagnosed at stage III and IV. Payer status showed a statistically significant relationship with overall survival. This remained true after adjusting for other predictive factors. Patients with no insurance or Medicaid had higher mortality.

SWOG S0221: a phase III trial comparing chemotherapy schedules in high-risk early-stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the optimal dose and schedule of anthracycline and taxane administration as adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 2 × 2 factorial design was used to test two hypotheses: (1) that a novel continuous schedule of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide was superior to six cycles of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide once every 2 weeks and (2) that paclitaxel once per week was superior to six cycles of paclitaxel once every 2 weeks in patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative early-stage breast cancer. With 3,250 patients, a disease-free survival (DFS) hazard ratio of 0.82 for each randomization could be detected with 90% power with two-sided α = .05. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Interim analyses crossed the futility boundaries for demonstrating superiority of both once-per-week regimens and once-every-2-weeks regimens. After a median follow-up of 6 years, a significant interaction developed between the two randomization factors (DFS P = .024; OS P = .010) in the 2,716 patients randomly assigned in the original design, which precluded interpretation of the two factors separately. Comparing all four arms showed a significant difference in OS (P = .040) but not in DFS (P = .11), with all treatments given once every 2 weeks associated with the highest OS. This difference in OS seemed confined to patients with hormone receptor-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -negative tumors (P = .067), with no differences seen with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (P = .90) or HER2-positive tumors (P = .40). CONCLUSION: Patients achieved a similar DFS with any of these regimens. Subset analysis suggests the hypothesis that once-every-2-weeks dosing may be best for patients with hormone receptor-negative/HER2-negative tumors.

Commercial insurance triples chances of breast cancer survival in a public hospital.

Breast cancer survival is affected both by endogenous factors and exogenous factors such as socioeconomic status. This study explored the relationship between insurance status and overall survival of 987 female breast cancer patients in a population served by a public hospital. All patients were offered the same level of care regardless of ability to pay. Of the 987 breast cancer patients investigated, 54.6% were African-American. 54.1% of patients were insured (commercial insurance or Medicare), 27.1% with Medicaid, and 18.8% who were uninsured. Overall median survival was 15.5 years and was not statistically significant between Caucasian and African-American women. Median survival times were 15.8, 11.3, and 8.2 years for insured, Medicaid, and uninsured groups, respectively. Uninsured patients had worse overall survival rates compared with insured patients (p < 0.05). Adjusting for other factors (e.g., stage, age, race, body mass index, and income), insurance was a significant factor affecting survival with hazard ratios of 2.24 and 3.22 for Medicaid and uninsured patients, respectively, compared with insured patients. Even in a public hospital, after adjusting for potential risk factors, insurance status still proved to be an important factor in the survival of breast cancer patients. Further research is necessary to identify causal factors related to the survival disparities associated with insurance status.

Morbid obesity does not disadvantage patients with in situ or early-stage carcinoma undergoing breast-conserving surgery.

AIM: To determine whether morbidly obese (MO) patients with early-stage breast cancer (BCa) benefit from standard-of-care interventions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1992 and 2005, 100 patients underwent breast-conserving surgery and postoperative whole-breast irradiation of 50 Gy for minimally invasive BCa with tumor-free surgical margins. Twenty-seven MO women were compared to 73 non-morbidly obese (NMO) patients. RESULTS: At 10 years, the cumulative disease-free survival rate for the NMO patients was 91% compared to the non-statistically significant lower rate of 89% in the MO women (p=0.66). Patients who were excessively obese were not at an increased risk for local (p=0.99) or regional disease recurrence (p=0.29). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that patients with minimally invasive BCa and excessively large body habitus should not be disqualified from receiving breast-conserving therapy.

Does obesity have an effect on outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer?

BACKGROUND: Among patients with breast cancer, obesity has been associated with an increased likelihood of having triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This association has been thought to be due to the antiapoptotic effects of obesity-related proteins. However, the effect of obesity on the outcomes in patients with TNBC remains unclear. We hypothesized that obesity would be associated with decreased overall survival and disease-free survival in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was conducted of patients treated for breast cancer at an academic medical center from March 1998 to September 2011. The body mass index (BMI) of patients with TNBC was calculated at diagnosis. The patients were categorized as normal (BMI < 25 kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI 25-30 kg/m(2)), or obese (BMI > 30 kg/m(2)). The endpoints of overall survival and disease-free survival were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients with TNBC were included for analysis. Of the 183 patients, 24 (13.1%) were normal (BMI < 25 kg/m(2)), 42 (23.1%) were overweight (BMI 25-30 kg/m(2)), and 117 (63.7%) were obese (BMI > 30 kg/m(2)). The median follow-up period was 42.5 months. Of the 183 patients, 2 (9.1%) died in the normal group, 10 (23.1%) died in the overweight group, and 25 (21.4%) died in the obese group (P = 0.28). The patients who were overweight or obese had larger tumors (P = 0.02), a higher T stage (P = 0.001), and higher tumor grade (P = 0.01) than the normal BMI patients. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, normal patients had higher overall survival than the overweight or obese patients, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.29). Disease-free survival was also not significantly different (P = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increased frequency of larger tumors, higher T stage, and higher tumor grade, obesity was not associated with decreased overall or disease-free survival in patients with TNBC.

Carcinoma of the axillary tail of Spence: a case series.

There is sparse information about cancer in the axillary tail of Spence (CATS). Eight hundred and thirty-nine patients with breast cancer were retrospectively studied for the occurrence of CATS. Ten patients were identified based on detection by imaging studies. A tendency towards stage II or III disease, and estrogen and progesterone receptor-negative neoplasms in the older age (>45 years) group was observed. Management by conservative or radical surgery, with or without postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, effected an estimated five-year disease-free survival rate of 67%, and rates of local failure, regional recurrence as well as distant metastasis of 0%, 10% and 30%, respectively. The treatment of CATS in accordance with modern day standards of care resulted in acceptable prognosis and disease control.

Superwarfarin intoxication: two case reports and review of pathophysiology and patient management.

Superwarfarin vitamin K antagonists are found in rat poisons and are readily available. Pediatric exposures are common but are usually asymptomatic without significant coagulopathy. Superwarfarin intoxication must be considered in any adult who presents with an unexplained coagulopathy with extreme elevation of prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time with associated depletion of vitamin K dependent factors. If superwarfarin toxicity is confirmed, intentional ingestion should be considered, as a large quantity of ingested rat poison is necessary to induce a coagulopathy. Patients with superwarfin induced coagulopathy require several months of high dose oral and parenteral vitamin K supplementation. We describe two patients with superwarfarin toxicity treated at Louisiana State University Health in Shreveport and review pathophysiology and patient management.

Should a routine metastatic workup be performed for all patients with pathologic N2/N3 breast cancer?

BACKGROUND: Node-positive breast cancer patients are at risk for metastatic disease. A routine metastatic workup might or might not be necessary for all patients with N2 or N3 diseases. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend a metastatic workup for patients with T3N1 disease, yet no definitive recommendations are made for N2/N3 diseases. We hypothesized that for patients with operable pathologic N2/N3 diseases, a metastatic workup should only be considered for patients with T3/T4 lesions. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred and fifty-six patients with pathologic N2/N3 diseases were identified from a prospective breast cancer database of 1,329 patients with stage 0 to III breast cancer. A metastatic workup included chest x-rays, bone scans, CT scans, and PET scans. Primary end point was incidence of stage IV disease at the time of diagnosis or within 1 month of definitive surgery. Statistical analysis included chi-square test, independent t-test, Kaplan-Meier Survival method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model. A p value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 158 patients with N2 disease (62%) and 98 with N3 disease (38%). Overall, 16% had stage IV disease (N2 = 15%, N3 = 16%). There was no significant difference in age (p = 0.37), tumor size (p = 0.89), tumor grade (p = 0.09), estrogen-receptor status (p = 0.23), or progesterone-receptor status (p = 0.35) between the N2 and N3 groups. Incidences of stage IV disease were T0/T1, 0%; T2, 6%; T3, 22%; and T4, 36%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only T stage (p = 0.0006) and grade (p = 0.026) were independent predictors of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: A metastatic workup is only indicated for N2/N3 patients with T3 or T4 primary lesions.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with metastatic breast cancer: ethnic and socio-economic aspects.

Bisphosphonate therapy is an important adjunct to the treatment of patients with bone metastasis. Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ), a complication related to bisphosphonate therapy, is reported in up to 7% of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The objective of this study was to define the prevalence and to identify risk factors associated with development of ONJ in a predominantly low socio-economic population. Medical records of patients with a diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer with bone metastasis seen between 2002 and 2007 were reviewed. All patients received a minimum of four infusions of zolendronic acid. Data on demographics, insurance status, tobacco use, concurrent therapy, body mass index, and number of zolendronic acid infusions were analyzed. Of the 110 patient analyzed, 10 developed ONJ (9%) with the mean number of zolendronic acid infusions in patients with ONJ of 22.9 ± 17. ONJ was seen more frequently in Caucasian than in African Americans patients (15% versus 2%; p = 0.019). ONJ was associated with older age at diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer (p = 0.02), tobacco use (p = 0.049), but was not associated with SES or duration of therapy. After adjusting for SES, Caucasian patients were 9.1 times more likely to have ONJ when compared with African American patients. (95% CI 1.03-81.7). Our results suggest an increase prevalence of ONJ in Caucasian breast cancer patients. However, as our study population is small, additional studies to confirm this finding are needed.

Trimodal therapy for inflammatory breast cancer: a surgeon's perspective.

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and most aggressive form of breast cancer. The onset and progression of disease are rapid; diagnosis must be made expediently to initiate treatment quickly. In this review, the clinical presentation, trimodal therapy, surgical principles and a brief summary of the Louisiana State University at Shreveport experience with IBC are presented. With this aggressive approach, 5-year survival of better than 40-50% can be expected. This represents a substantive improvement in clinical outcome for IBC patients compared with 30 years ago.