ABSTRACT
A 12-year-old girl developed a distal femoral shaft fracture treated with lateral trochanteric entry intramedullary nail fixation. The nail was retained after union because of a persistent nonossifying fibroma at the previous fracture site. At 16 months after surgery, marked valgus deformity was noted at the distal femur, with signs of implant haloing and loosening, suggesting repetitive motion and stress concentration of forces at the distal femur. Owing to recognition before skeletal maturity, the valgus was corrected with hemiepiphysiodesis. This finding illustrates the importance of follow-up up to skeletal maturity for pediatric femoral shaft fractures and consideration of routine removal of implants after fracture union to avoid this previously unreported complication.
Subject(s)
Femoral Fractures, Distal , Femoral Fractures , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Female , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/adverse effects , Bone Nails/adverse effects , Femoral Fractures/etiology , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Femur/surgery , Lower ExtremityABSTRACT
CASE: A child with Type IV Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) sustained a growth arrest of the distal femur after fixation of a left femur fracture with a Fassier-Duval expanding rod at 3 years old. Despite bar resection with fat interposition, the discrepancy progressed to 7.5 cm at maturity. Because the femur had grown to a sufficient diameter, he underwent successful lengthening with a magnetic intramedullary rod. CONCLUSION: Although it is a potential complication, growth arrest has not been reported in association with placement of an expanding nail in a child with osteogenesis imperfecta. This case illustrates this rare complication and treatment using a magnetic intramedullary rod.
Subject(s)
Femoral Fractures , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Osteogenesis Imperfecta , Child , Male , Humans , Child, Preschool , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/complications , Osteogenesis Imperfecta/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/adverse effects , Femoral Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Fractures/etiology , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Magnetic PhenomenaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Our 2 previous studies (1999, 2007) examining misrepresentation of research publications among orthopaedic residency applicants revealed rates of misrepresentation of 18.0% and 20.6%, respectively. As the residency selection process has become more competitive, the number of applicants who list publications has increased. The purpose of this study was to determine current rates of research misrepresentation by orthopaedic surgery applicants. METHODS: We reviewed the publication listings and research section of the Common Application Form from the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) for all applicants applying to 1 orthopaedic residency program. The PubMed-MEDLINE database was principally used to search for citations. The PubMed Identifier (PMID) number was used; if no PMID number was listed, a combination of authors or the title of the work was used. If the citations were not found through PubMed, a previously developed algorithm was followed to determine misrepresentation. Misrepresentation was defined as (1) nonauthorship of a published article in which authorship was claimed, (2) claimed authorship of a nonexistent article, or (3) self-promotion to a higher authorship status within a published article. RESULTS: Five hundred and seventy-three applicants applied to our institution for residency in 2016 to 2017: 250 (43.6%) of 573 applicants did not list a publication, whereas 323 (56.4%) of 573 applicants listed ≥1 publication. We found 13 cases of misrepresentation among a total of 1,100 citations (1.18% in 2017 versus 18.0% in 1999 and 20.6% in 2007, p < 0.001). Ten cases of misrepresentation were self-promotion to a higher authorship status. There were 2 cases of claimed authorship of an article that could not be found. Only 1 applicant misrepresented more than once. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, orthopaedic surgery residency applicants are accurately representing their publication information. The incorporation of the PMID number on the ERAS application has streamlined the process for finding publications, and has possibly encouraged veracity on residency applications. Faculty involved in the resident selection process should be aware of the significant decline in the rate of misrepresentation by medical students applying for orthopaedic surgery residency versus the rate in our prior studies.
