ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study was to determine whether any clinical or demographic characteristics could identify adult female patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a history of domestic abuse. A second objective was to describe the frequency, types, and severity of this abuse. METHODS: This study was a crosssectional survey of 611 women conducted in an academically-affiliated, urban ED. Domestic abuse was described as "recent" (within the preceding 12 months) or "lifetime" (recent or past). This included emotional, physical, and sexual abuse. RESULTS: Recent (7.9%, n = 48) and lifetime (38%, n = 232) domestic abuse was reported. For recently abused women, violence had been severe (87.5%, n = 42) and was associated with 1) trauma (OR 5.4, 95% CI = 2.6 to 11.6), 2) obstetrical and gynecological syndromes (OR 5.6, 95% CI = 2.4 to 13.2), and 3) psychiatric symptoms and substance use (OR 7.3, 95% CI = 2.4 to 22.0). The sensitivities and positive predictive values of these risk factors individually (<27.1% and <25.0%, respectively) and in aggregate (56.3% and 20.9%, respectively) were low. These indicators predicted only 27 (56.3%) of recently abused women. Lifetime domestic violence was more likely in homeless women (OR 5.8, 95% CI = 2.2 to 15.0), although less likely in immigrants (OR 0.4, 95% CI = 0.3 to 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical presentations and demographic characteristics of women presenting to the ED may not be sensitive or predictive indicators of domestic abuse. In the absence of typical clinical or demographic findings, asking all women in the ED about domestic abuse remains a necessary priority.
Subject(s)
Domestic Violence/psychology , Domestic Violence/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Battered Women/psychology , Battered Women/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , New York/epidemiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk Factors , Sensitivity and Specificity , Surveys and Questionnaires , Trauma Severity Indices , Urban Health/statistics & numerical data , Women's HealthABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to determine whether rates of eye disease among the elderly are higher for residents of nursing homes than for persons who reside elsewhere. Articles reporting the prevalence of eye disease in geriatric populations (classified as nursing home or non-nursing home) were identified through a Medline search and a search of articles' bibliographies. Identified articles were reviewed, and the relevant data compared with prevalence rates obtained from 738 residents of two nursing homes in New York City. Each of the nursing home residents received an ocular examination upon admission that determined the presence or absence of four varieties of eye disease-i.e. cataracts, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, and diabetic retinopathy. Demographic data were obtained through chart review. Results indicate that prevalence rates of eye disease found in geriatric nursing home populations are generally higher than those found in other geriatric populations. With the exception of the rates for diabetic retinopathy, the rates found in the combined nursing home population sampled in this study were much higher than those reported in any previous study. It is concluded that eye disease is a more serious problem for elderly residents of nursing homes than for the elderly who reside in the community. Possible reasons for this are discussed.
Subject(s)
Cattle/metabolism , Dieldrin/metabolism , Milk/metabolism , Adipose Tissue/metabolism , Administration, Oral , Animal Feed/analysis , Animals , Carbon Radioisotopes , Carboxylic Acids/analysis , Cold Temperature , Dieldrin/administration & dosage , Drug Stability , Female , Glycols/analysis , Milk/analysis , Pesticide Residues/analysis , Pregnancy , Time FactorsSubject(s)
Endrin/radiation effects , Sunlight , Endrin/analysis , Isomerases , Ketones , Kinetics , PhotochemistryABSTRACT
Movement of 2,4-dichlorophenyl methanesulfonate (35)S in plant roots was investigated using plastic containers which physically isolated portions of the plant root system. Results with bean and cotton plants showed that this compound can be absorbed in one part of the root system and distributed to other parts of the root system and also to the top of the plant. These tests confirm field observations of nematode control on roots outside a treated zone which indicated lateral movement of this compound in the roots. There was no evidence of its downward movement from treated leaves to stems or roots of cotton or beans.