ABSTRACT
Post-transplant Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PcP) is an uncommon but increasingly reported disease among solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although the introduction of PcP prophylaxis has reduced its overall incidence, its prevalence continues to be high, especially during the second year after transplant, the period following prophylaxis discontinuation. We recently described two cases of PcP occurring more than one year after heart transplantation (HT) in patients who were no longer receiving PcP prophylaxis according to the local protocol. In both cases, the disease was diagnosed following the diagnosis of a viral illness, resulting in a significantly increased risk for PcP. While current heart transplantation guidelines recommend Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis for up to 6-12 months after transplantation, after that period they only suggest an extended prophylaxis regimen in high-risk patients. Recent studies have identified several new risk factors that may be linked to an increased risk of PcP infection, including medication regimens and patient characteristics. Similarly, the indication for PcP prophylaxis in non-HIV patients has been expanded in relation to the introduction of new medications and therapeutic regimens for immune-mediated diseases. In our experience, the first patient was successfully treated with non-invasive ventilation, while the second required tracheal intubation, invasive ventilation, and extracorporeal CO2 removal due to severe respiratory failure. The aim of this double case report is to review the current timing of PcP prophylaxis after HT, the specific potential risk factors for PcP after HT, and the determinants of a prompt diagnosis and therapeutic approach in critically ill patients. We will also present a possible proposal for future investigations on indications for long-term prophylaxis.
ABSTRACT
Opportunistic and hospital-acquired infections are common among recipients of solid organ transplantation. New pathogens are increasingly reported in the intensive care unit (ICU) population. We report a case of a patient who developed Trichoderma spp.-related pneumonia (TRP) after heart-lung transplantation. In the absence of antifungal susceptibility testing, TRP was confirmed by histological examination, and empirical therapy with voriconazole and caspofungin was swiftly initiated. Complete resolution of pneumonia was obtained after prolonged combination therapy. Given the lack of guidelines, we conducted a systematic review to elucidate the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to apply during Trichoderma infection. After deduplication and selection of full texts, we found 42 articles eligible for the systematic review. Pneumonia seems to be the most common clinical manifestation (31.8%). The most used antifungal therapy was amphotericin B, while combination therapy was also reported (27.3%). All the patients were immunocompromised except for one case. Despite the rarity of Trichoderma spp. infection, the increase in invasive fungal infections is of growing importance in ICU, considering their impact on mortality and the emergence of antifungal resistance. In the absence of prospective and multicenter studies, a review can provide useful insight regarding the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and management of these unexpected challenges.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Regional anesthesia with thoracic wall blocks could represent an opioid-sparing alternative for mitral valve surgery in right minithoracotomy (mini-MVS). For the present study, an opioid-free analgesia using continuous deep serratus anterior plane block was compared with intravenous morphine. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, University of Turin, Italy. PARTICIPANTS: The present study enrolled patients who underwent mini-MVS from March to October 2019 (63 patients) and divided them into the following 2 groups, according to pain control strategy: a morphine group and a serratus anterior plane (SAP) group. INTERVENTIONS: Primary outcomes were pain evaluation and total postoperative opioid consumption, and secondary outcomes were incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to extubation, mechanical ventilation duration, and bowel dysfunction. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean number rating scale at 24 hours was 2.15 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-3.09) in the SAP group versus 3.23 (95% CI 2.28-4.29) in the morphine group (pâ¯=â¯0.07), whereas the mean number rating scale at 48 hours was significantly less in the SAP group compared with the morphine group (1.77 [95% CI 0.99-2.54] v 3.23 [95% CI 2.13-4.33], respectively; pâ¯=â¯0.03). Mean morphine consumption at 48 postoperative hours was 12.98 mg (95% CI 10.90-15.05 mg) in the morphine group and 2.22 mg (95% CI 0.99-3.44 mg) in the SAP group; p < 0.01. Cumulative morphine consumption at 24 postoperative hours was 10.44 mg (95% CI 8.36-12.52) in the morphine group and 1.16 mg (95% CI 0.37-1.95) in the SAP group; p < 0.01. There were no significant differences for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous deep serratus anterior plane block seems to be a valid alternative to intravenous opioids in terms of efficacy for patients undergoing mini-MVS with a lower opioid requirement.
