Ultrasound-guided Placement of Single-lumen Peripheral Intravenous Catheters in the Internal Jugular Vein.

INTRODUCTION: The peripheral internal jugular (IJ), also called the "easy IJ," is an alternative to peripheral venous access reserved for patients with difficult intravenous (IV) access. The procedure involves placing a single-lumen catheter in the IJ vein under ultrasound (US) guidance. As this technique is relatively new, the details regarding the ease of the procedure, how exactly it should be performed, and the safety of the procedure are uncertain. Our primary objective was to determine the success rate for peripheral IJ placement. Secondarily, we evaluated the time needed to complete the procedure and assessed for complications. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center study of US-guided peripheral IJ placement using a 2.5-inch, 18-gauge catheter on a convenience sample of patients with at least two unsuccessful attempts at peripheral IV placement by nursing staff. Peripheral IJ lines were placed by emergency medicine (EM) attending physicians and EM residents who had completed at least five IJ central lines. All physicians who placed lines for the study watched a 15-minute lecture about peripheral IJ technique. A research assistant monitored each line to assess for complications until the patient was discharged. RESULTS: We successfully placed a peripheral IJ in 34 of 35 enrolled patients (97.1%). The median number of attempts required for successful cannulation was one (interquartile range (IQR): 1 to 2). The median time to successful line placement was 3 minutes and 6 seconds (IQR: 59 seconds to 4 minutes and 14 seconds). Two lines failed after placement, and one of the 34 successfully placed peripheral IJ lines (2.9%) had a complication - a local hematoma. There were, however, no arterial punctures or pneumothoraces. Although only eight of 34 lines were placed using sterile attire, there were no line infections. CONCLUSION: Our research adds to the growing body of evidence supporting US-guided peripheral internal jugular access as a safe and convenient procedure alternative for patients who have difficult IV access.

Phase I study of 90Y-CC49 monoclonal antibody therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: effect of chelating agents and paclitaxel co-administration.

PURPOSE: This trial was designed to evaluate strategies to improve the efficacy of a radiolabeled monoclonal antibody (mCC49) against tumor-associated glycoprotein-72 (TAG-72) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aims of this study were to determine: safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of (90)Y-mCC49 in combination with interferon alpha2beta (IFN); whether calcium disodium versonate (EDTA) or diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (DTPA) could reduce myelosuppression; and safety and MTD of paclitaxel (Taxol) in combination with (90)Y-mCC49. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced (TAG-72 positive) non-small cell lung cancer were entered in three phases; the first was the dose escalation of a single agent (90)Y-mCC49. In the second phase, the dose escalation of (90)Y-mCC49 was attempted with concurrent EDTA or DTPA chelator therapy. In the third phase, radiosensitization with a continuous infusion of paclitaxel (96-hour) was administered with (90)Y-mCC49. All patients received IFN for TAG-72 up-regulation. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were evaluable. Reversible Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The MTD of (90)Y-mCC49/IFN was 14 mCi/m(2). EDTA did not alter toxicity, while there was a modest reduction of myelosuppression with DTPA. The MTD of continuous infusion paclitaxel in combination with 14 mCi/m(2) of (90)Y-CC49 was 60 mg/m(2). There were no objective tumor responses. CONCLUSIONS: (90)Y-mCC49/IFN was well tolerated at a dose of 14 mCi/m(2). The clinical effect of adjunctive chelating therapy with DTPA was modest. The MTD of coadministered continuous infusion (96-hour) paclitaxel was 60 mg/m(2). Because of the immunogenicity of the murine compound, future studies are planned using a humanized version of CC49.

Phase I/IIa study of cisplatin and gemcitabine as induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine and paclitaxel for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This is a phase I/IIa study to assess tolerance of gemcitabine and paclitaxel with radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after induction chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22 and gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 22, and 28. Chemoradiotherapy began on day 43 as follows: cohort 1 (n = 9), gemcitabine 300 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 35 mg/m2 weekly (except week 9); cohort 2 (n = 9), gemcitabine 150 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 35 mg/m2 weekly (except week 9); cohort 3 (n = 10) and the 25 phase IIa patients, gemcitabine 300 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 every 21 days. Patients were treated with three-dimensional thoracic radiotherapy concurrently to 60 Gy. RESULTS: Weekly chemotherapy resulted in grade 4 esophageal and grade 3 or higher pulmonary toxicities. Reduction in dose density (cohort 3) led to a tolerable toxicity profile and was chosen as the phase IIa regimen. The response rate to induction was 49%, with stable disease in 40% of the patients. The response rate after consolidation therapy was 75% (94% for weekly chemotherapy v 82% for every 3 weeks). Median survival was 23 months, and 3-year survival was 45% for eligible patients. Local relapse occurred in 20% of the patients. Performance status of more than 1 predicted for poor outcome, but baseline pulmonary function did not. Dosimetric parameters including V15, V20, V30 (percent lung volume receiving > or = 15, > or = 20, and > or = 30 Gy, respectively), and mean lung dose correlated with pulmonary toxicity. CONCLUSION: Additional investigation with the 3-week schedule is warranted in patients with a good performance status based on the safety profile and preliminary efficacy data observed in this study.

Phase II study of docetaxel plus enoxaparin in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary results.

Activation of coagulation appears to play a role in tumor progression. This report describes the preliminary results of a phase II study using docetaxel plus enoxaparin in 15 patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Time to progression was the primary endpoint. Several surrogate markers of coagulation and angiogenesis were evaluated. Enoxaparin was administered at a daily dose of 1 mg/kg (subcutaneously). The initial dose of docetaxel was 100 mg/m2, given as a 60 min infusion every 21 days with prophylactic dexamethasone. Eight patients achieved an objective response (53%) and four had stable disease, with a median duration of 3.5 months. The median time to progression was 5 months (range, 2 to >15 months). The median survival was 11 months. The most frequent toxicities were neutropenia and asthenia. No significant bleeding or thrombotic events were observed. Eleven patients had elevated D-dimer plasma levels prior to therapy, and seven of these patients with a response or stable disease had a significant decline of the D-dimer during therapy. There were no consistent changes of the plasma levels of the angiogenic factors, except for transforming growth factor-beta-1 (TGF-beta1). The median baseline level of TGF-beta1 prior to therapy was 34,867 pg/ml. Twelve out of 13 patients who achieved a response or stable disease had a significant reduction of the TGF-beta1 levels during therapy. Enoxaparin in combination with chemotherapy was safe and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC. This preliminary data suggests that enoxaparin may prolong the time to progression, and therefore justify the continuation of this trial.

Chemotherapy tolerance after radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-CC49 monoclonal antibody in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: clinical effects and hematologic toxicity.

The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the hematologic toxicity and clinical outcome of salvage chemotherapy following (90)Y-CC49 radioimmunotherapy (RIT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sixteen patients from a total of 37 who were enrolled in a phase I trial of (90)Y-CC49 monoclonal therapy were treated with post-RIT salvage chemotherapy at our institution. Five patients had received chest radiation therapy prior to RIT, and seven patients had prior chemotherapy. The majority of these patients were treated with doses of (90)Y of >/= 14 mCi/m(2) (8-20 mCi/m(2)), and four of them received concurrent 96-hour taxol infusion. The maximum tolerated dose of this study was exceeded at 17 mCi/m(2), and grade 4 thrombocytopenia/neutropenia were the dose-limiting toxicities. Twelve patients received one chemotherapy regimen as salvage therapy, and four patients had more than one regimen. Four patients (25%) experienced reversible grade 4 neutropenia, but no grade 4 thrombocytopenia was observed. Five patients had stable disease. The median survival from start of salvage therapy was 5.5 months. Our data suggest that therapy with RIT did not significantly affect survival of these patients. Taking into consideration the potential clinical relevance of integration of RIT with other treatment modalities, it is important to expand this clinical experience in order to support combined modality strategies.