Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Trials ; 17(1): 127, 2016 Mar 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26955809

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth largest cause of cancer death in the United States and Europe with over 100,000 deaths per year in Europe alone. The overall 5-year survival ranges from 2-7 % and has hardly improved over the last two decades. Approximately 15 % of all patients have resectable disease at diagnosis, and of those, only a subgroup has a resectable tumour at surgical exploration. Data from cohort studies have suggested that outcome can be improved by preoperative radiochemotherapy, but data from well-designed randomized studies are lacking. Our PREOPANC phase III trial aims to test the hypothesis that median overall survival of patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer can be improved with preoperative radiochemotherapy. METHODS/DESIGN: The PREOPANC trial is a randomized, controlled, multicentric superiority trial, initiated by the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. Patients with (borderline) resectable pancreatic cancer are randomized to A: direct explorative laparotomy or B: after negative diagnostic laparoscopy, preoperative radiochemotherapy, followed by explorative laparotomy. A hypofractionated radiation scheme of 15 fractions of 2.4 gray (Gy) is combined with a course of gemcitabine, 1,000 mg/m(2)/dose on days 1, 8 and 15, preceded and followed by a modified course of gemcitabine. The target volumes of radiation are delineated on a 4D CT scan, where at least 95 % of the prescribed dose of 36 Gy in 15 fractions should cover 98 % of the planning target volume. Standard adjuvant chemotherapy is administered in both treatment arms after resection (six cycles in arm A and four in arm B). In total, 244 patients will be randomized in 17 hospitals in the Netherlands. The primary endpoint is overall survival by intention to treat. Secondary endpoints are (R0) resection rate, disease-free survival, time to locoregional recurrence or distant metastases and perioperative complications. Secondary endpoints for the experimental arm are toxicity and radiologic and pathologic response. DISCUSSION: The PREOPANC trial is designed to investigate whether preoperative radiochemotherapy improves overall survival by means of increased (R0) resection rates in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial open for accrual: 3 April 2013 The Netherlands National Trial Register - NTR3709 (8 November 2012) EU Clinical Trials Register - 2012-003181-40 (11 December 2012).


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Pancreatectomy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant/mortality , Clinical Protocols , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/adverse effects , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Administration Schedule , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Neoadjuvant Therapy/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm Staging , Netherlands , Pancreatectomy/adverse effects , Pancreatectomy/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Radiation Dose Hypofractionation , Research Design , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Burden , Gemcitabine
2.
Dig Surg ; 28(2): 141-7, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21540600

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hilar resection in combination with extended liver resections has resulted in a higher rate of R0 resections and increased survival in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). This aggressive surgical approach is, however, associated with high rates of operative morbidity and mortality, largely due to postresectional liver failure. We previously reported a series after resection of HCCA in which R0 resection rate was 59% with a mortality rate of 10%. In this study, we assessed mortality of extended liver resections after optimizing liver functional reserve and application of parenchyma-sparing techniques. METHODS: From 2008 until June 2010, 41 consecutive patients underwent resection on the suspicion of HCCA. Preoperative workup included staging laparoscopy, preoperative biliary drainage, assessment of volume/function of future remnant liver and radiation therapy to prevent seeding metastases. Modified right and left extended hemihepatectomies were performed preserving parts of segments 4 and 8, respectively, while pursuing complete excision of the tumor. Outcomes of resection were evaluated. RESULTS: The majority of resections (78%) were performed for Bismuth type III-IV tumors. Preoperative biliary drainage was undertaken in 37 (90%) patients. Hilar resection in combination with liver resection was performed in 35 (85%) patients. Of these resections, 61% were modified extended resections including central liver resections. The R0 resection rate was 92%. Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 54 and 7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Strategies to optimize liver function and to reduce removal of functional liver parenchyma were associated with a decrease in mortality (7%) while undertaking extended resection for HCCA with an R0 resection rate of 92%.


Subject(s)
Cholangiocarcinoma/pathology , Cholangiocarcinoma/surgery , Hepatectomy/mortality , Hepatectomy/methods , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Bile , Cholangiocarcinoma/mortality , Drainage/methods , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Liver/physiology , Liver Function Tests , Liver Neoplasms/mortality
3.
Dig Surg ; 22(3): 191-7, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16137997

ABSTRACT

AIM OF THE STUDY: In two institutions, a retrospective analysis was performed on patients with histologically proven locally advanced pancreatic cancer without distant metastases. The aim of this analysis is to assess whether chemoradiotherapy provides survival benefit for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Forty-five patients from the Erasmus Medical Centre (Erasmus MC), Rotterdam, received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and radiotherapy and, 38 patients from the Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam (AMC) were offered the best supportive care. Radiotherapy consisted of 50 Gy external upper abdomen radiation in two courses, concomitant with intravenous 5-FU 25 mg/kg/ 24 h continuously on the first 4 days of each treatment course. RESULTS: The treatment protocol was completed in 38 of 45 patients (84%) without complications. Radiological response was evaluated in 38 patients. Ten patients (26%) showed a partial response, stable disease was seen in 6 (16%) patients and progressive disease in 22 (58%) patients. A second-look operation was performed in 8 of 10 patients (72%) showing a radiological response, in 3 patients the tumour could be resected. Median overall survival time for the Erasmus MC group (n = 45) was 9.8 months compared to 7.6 months when the best supportive care was given (AMC group, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Although overall survival remains poor, treatment with 5-FU and radiotherapy might benefit some patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...