Effect of comorbidities on clinical outcome of patients with burn injury - An analysis of the German Burn Registry.

BACKGROUND: Severe burn injuries are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Well-implemented scoring systems for patients with major burns exist in the literature. A major disadvantage of these scores is the partial non-consideration of patient-related comorbidities. Published data on this matter is limited to small study cohorts and/or single center studies. Further, the effect of comorbidities on clinical outcome of patients with severe burn injuries has not yet been examined nationwide in a large cohort in Germany. Hence, the aim of this study was to examine the influence of comorbidities on clinical outcome of these patients based on data from the national registry. METHODS: Anonymized data from a total of 3455 patients with documented burns of 1% or more Total Burn Surface Area (TBSA) and over 16 years of age included in the German Burn Registry between 2017 and 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Data included burn extent, body weight, age, burn depth, inhalation injury, comorbidities, mortality, number of operations and length of hospital stay (LOS). RESULTS: In the logistic regression analysis age (OR 1.07 [1.06-1.09], p < 0.001), TBSA (OR 1.09 [1.08-1.11], p < 0.001), IHT (OR 2.15 [1.44-3.20], p < 0001), third degree burn (OR 2.08 [1.39-3.11], p < 0.001), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (OR 2.45 [1.38-4.35], p = 0.002) and renal insufficiency (OR 2.02 [1.13-3.59], p = 0.017) influenced mortality significantly. If a patient had more than one comorbidity, mortality was higher and in-hospital length of stay (LOS) longer. Renal insufficiency was significantly (p < 0.001) associated with the most prolonged LOS by 11.44 days. TBSA (p < 0.001), Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI) > 3 (p < 0.001) and IHT (p = 0.001) correlated with the amount of required surgeries and significantly predicted the need for intubation. Patients with arrhythmia significantly required more surgeries (p = 0.041), whereas patients with COPD required significantly less surgical interventions (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Preexisting comorbidities have a significant impact on the clinical outcome of patients with severe burn injuries. Further investigation is warranted in order to supplement existing prognostic scores with new mortality-associated parameters.

[Reduction of needlestick injuries by 48 % in 1 year : Effects of improvement of the safety concept according to the European Union Council directive 2010/32/EU at a large regional hospital]. / Reduktion von Nadelstichverletzungen um 48 % in einem Jahr : Auswirkungen einer Verbesserung des Sicherheitskonzeptes nach der EU-Direktive 2010/32/EU an einem großen regionalen Krankenhaus.

BACKGROUND: Needlestick injuries (NSI) are potentially infectious injuries from sharp or pointed medical instruments and through contact with blood on mucous membranes or nonintact skin. Although the European Union (EU) Council directive 2010/32/EU on the prevention of NSI was implemented in EU countries in 2013, information on the effectiveness of the measures is limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a safety concept according to the EU Council Directive 2010/32/EU on prevention of NSI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2016 the NSI safety concept at a large regional hospital was improved according to 2010/32/EU, specifically by an update of blood screening profiles and standard operating procedures (SOP), better dissemination of information to employees and complete conversion to safety cannulas and scalpels. The medical records of all NSIs from 2015-2017 were retrospectively anonymized and evaluated and a cost analysis was performed. RESULTS: The number of NSIs in 2017 was significantly reduced by 48.4% as compared to 2016 and NSIs with scalpels were completely prevented. The proportion of employees with NSIs who were adequately immunized against hepatitis B was significantly increased to 84.1% in 2017. Furthermore, identification of the index patient was significantly increased to 82.5% in 2017. The cost of avoiding NSIs increased by a total of 24.1% in 2017 as compared to 2015 before introduction of the safety concept. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the EU Council directive 2010/32/EU, resulted in an almost 50% reduction in NSIs over 1 year, including the complete prevention of NSIs due to scalpels. In addition, the anamnestic presence of immunization against hepatitis B and index patient identification were significantly increased.

Does Increased Patient Load Improve Mortality in Burns?: Identifying Benchmark Parameters Defining Quality of Burn Care.

INTRODUCTION: In burn care, as in other medical fields, there is a tendency to increase the required number of patients for center certifications. Does the increase in patient load automatically improve the quality of burn care? What are the benchmark parameters that have been shown to improve burn care? METHODS: To answer these questions, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Livivo were searched from inception through January 2018 for all studies evaluating the influence of treatment parameters on outcomes in different burn care settings. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included in this systematic review. In adults, not a single study showed a decreased mortality due to a higher patient load. However, in children, 2 studies demonstrated a further decrease of the already low mortality due to an increase in patient load. In contrast to patient load, benchmark parameters that had a significant influence on the outcome of burn care for adults and children were: single bed isolation, residency programs, American Burn Association certifications of burn centers, speed of wound closure, and standard operating procedures for burn care. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review demonstrates that a clear correlation between patient load and mortality reduction in adult burn treatment is not supported by the existing literature, requiring future studies. In contrast, all efforts aiming to improve the quality of burn care, such as isolation of burn patients, speed of wound closure, American Burn Association verification and especially standard operating procedures for burn care improve survival and quality of burn care.

Burn Scar Evaluation Using the Cutometer® MPA 580 in Comparison to "Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale" and "Vancouver Scar Scale".

The effect of the "Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale" (POSAS) and "Vancouver Scar Scale" (VSS) on patients' quality of life and their correlation with objective scar assessment tools, such as the Cutometer®, is not fully elucidated. In addition, long-term results of the dermal substitute Matriderm® used in combination with split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) remain unclear. We evaluated burn scars of 45 patients at least 2 years postburn injury using the Cutometer® MPA 580, the VSS, and the POSAS with three additional questions regarding quality of life and correlated the results. Study groups were: 1) scars following conservative treatment, 2) scars following STSG, and 3) scars following STSG in combination with Matriderm®. Cutometer® measurements demonstrated better elastic qualities in the Matriderm® group compared with the STSG group. VSS and extended POSAS were rated best for the conservative group, followed by the STSG group and the Matriderm® group. There was a significant correlation between POSAS and VSS, quality of life and the objective Cutometer® measurements. Conservatively treated superficial dermal burns do not reach the elastic qualities of healthy skin, and the use of Matriderm® significantly improves the long-term elastic qualities of STSG in deep dermal and full-thickness burns 2 years post injury. Results from the VSS and the POSAS correlate with restrictions in the quality of life of patients and also with objective Cutometer® measurements and are therefore useful tools in scar evaluation following burn injury.

Evaporative Water Loss in Superficial to Full Thickness Burns.

INTRODUCTION: Increased evaporative water loss (EWL) in burn patients leads to dehydration and hypothermia. Early clinical studies performed with outdated hygrometers suggested a 17 to 75 times increased EWL in burns with contradicting results for the different burn depths.Our study proposals were: (1) obtain reliable data of the EWL of all burn depths, (2) compare these results with findings from earlier studies, (3) evaluate the usefulness of the EWL in differentiating between superficial and deep partial thickness burns, (4) determine the effect of Biobrane on the EWL of superficial partial thickness burns in vivo, and (5) evaluate the effect of the sterile incision foil Opraflex on the EWL in split skin graft donor sites. METHODS: We measured the EWL of all burn depths in 28 patients under stable and recorded conditions regarding room temperature and humidity with a modern digital evaporimeter (Tewameter TM 300). For the first time in vivo, we also determined the effect of Biobrane on the EWL of burns and evaluated the EWL in split skin graft donor sites covered with Opraflex. RESULTS: The EWL in all burn depths was significantly increased (P < 0.001) compared with unburned skin. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the EWL of superficial compared with deep partial thickness burns, whereas full thickness burns had a significantly lower EWL (P < 0.05) compared with superficial and deep partial thickness burns. Biobrane significantly reduced the EWL (P < 0.05) of superficial partial thickness burns. The EWL of Opraflex covered skin graft donor sites was significantly reduced compared with uncovered donor sites (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the actual EWL in burns is approximately 3 times higher in full thickness burns and approximately 4 times higher in superficial and deep partial thickness burns compared with normal skin and therefore much lower than suggested previously.Because there was no significant difference in the EWL of superficial compared with deep partial thickness burns, the EWL cannot be used to differentiate between these burn depths.Biosynthetic wound dressings can significantly reduce the EWL of superficial partial thickness burns and sterile incision foil protects split skin graft donor sites from an increased EWL.

Trauma mechanisms, patterns of injury, and outcomes in a retrospective study of 71 burns from civil gas explosions.

BACKGROUND: Although explosion injuries caused by terror attacks or in war are evaluated in many studies, limited information about civil explosion injuries can be found in the literature. METHODS: In a retrospective study of 71 civil gas explosion injuries treated in a single burn center during a 16-year period, we evaluated trauma mechanisms, patterns of injury, and clinical outcome. RESULTS: More than 50% of all gas explosions injuries occurred in private households. The mortality correlated significantly with higher burned total body surface area (TBSA), higher abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI) score, accompanying inhalation injuries, and lung contusions. Although mean ABSI score and burned TBSA were similar in men and women (6 vs. 7 and 22% vs. 21%), the female mortality from gas explosions was noticeably higher, albeit not statistically significant due to small patient numbers (32% vs. 17%). Although mean burned TBSA, ABSI scores, and intensive care unit lengths of stay in patients with burns from gas explosions were comparable and not significantly different compared with all burn patients treated in our burn center (TBSA: 22% vs. 17%; ABSI: 6 vs. 6; and intensive care unit lengths of stay: 12 vs. 11 days), the mortality from gas explosions was significantly higher (21% vs. 12%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The mortality from gas explosion-related burns correlated significantly with burned TBSA, ABSI score, accompanying inhalation injuries, and lung contusions. Despite comparable ABSI scores, the mortality from gas explosion-related burns was significantly higher than the mortality for all burn victims.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in a nonthrombocytopenic patient with toxic epidermal necrolysis causing fatal outcome: is HIT still a HIT?

The definition of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) has been modified over time; however, most definitions require a relative or absolute thrombocytopenia after exposure to heparin. Therefore, routine platelet count monitoring has been recommended for screening. We present the case of a 26-year-old male patient with toxic epidermal necrolysis who developed a rapid and fatal clinical presentation of HIT, without thrombocytopenia at the time of diagnosis. Because our patient did not present a relative or absolute thrombocytopenia at the time of serological and clinical confirmation of HIT, routine platelet count monitoring failed to detect HIT in our patient. As a result of the here presented case of rapid and fatal HIT, it may be prudent to consider if thrombocytopenia, although it is still a common and important hallmark of HIT, should be an absolute requirement for the definition of HIT. In cases of HIT without any thrombocytopenia, screening for HIT antibodies may be the only way to detect HIT early enough to react. Because there is a high incidence of HIT antibodies in the general population, which are not always associated with HIT, screening for HIT antibodies cannot be recommended for every patient receiving heparin. However, prospective studies may be useful in determining if routine screening for HIT antibodies can decrease the morbidity and mortality of HIT in critically ill patients receiving therapeutic doses of unfractionated heparin on the intensive care unit.