Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Occup Environ Med ; 64(12): e823-e832, 2022 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36136663

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare opioid prescription incidence, supply days, and cost associated with occupational injury and other injury-caused conditions. METHODS: We used Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data for 2010-2019. The MEPS provides information on medical conditions and associated medical encounters, treatments, and treatment costs, as well as demographic, education, health, working status, income, and insurance coverage information. We used descriptive statistics and logistic and 2-part regressions. RESULTS: Controlling for covariates and compared with other injury-caused conditions, occupational injury-caused conditions resulted in 33% higher odds of opioid prescribing, 32.8 more opioid prescription supply days, and $134 higher average cost. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational injuries were associated with higher opioid incidence and costs, and more opioid supply days. These findings point to the need to focus on making work safer and the role employers may play in supporting worker recovery from injury and opioid use disorders.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Occupational Injuries , Humans , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Occupational Injuries/epidemiology , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Prescriptions
2.
J Occup Environ Med ; 60(11): 968-978, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30407366

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is growing interest in the NIOSH Total Worker Health program, specifically in the process of designing and implementing safer, health-promoting work and workplaces. A Total Worker Health (TWH) Research Methodology Workshop was convened to discuss research methods and future needs. METHODS: Twenty-six experts in occupational safety and health and related fields reviewed and discussed current methodological and measurement issues and those showing promise. RESULTS: TWH intervention studies face the same challenges as other workplace intervention studies and some unique ones. Examples are provided of different approaches and their applications to TWH intervention studies, and desired developments in the TWH literature. CONCLUSIONS: This report discusses and outlines principles important to building the TWH intervention research base. Rigorous, valid methodologic, and measurement approaches are needed for TWH intervention as well as for basic/etiologic, translational, and surveillance research.


Subject(s)
Health Promotion/methods , Occupational Health , Program Development/methods , Program Evaluation/methods , Research Design , Humans , Organizational Case Studies/methods , Qualitative Research , Selection Bias , Workplace
3.
Am J Ind Med ; 58(11): 1205-16, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26331972

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Research has infrequently looked beyond the injured worker when gauging the burden of occupational injury. OBJECTIVES: We explored the relationship between occupational injury and musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) among family members of injured workers. DATA AND METHODS: We used 2005 and 2006 Truven Health Analytics databases, which contain information on workers' compensation and family healthcare claims. We used descriptive analyses, and negative binomial and two-part models. RESULTS: Family members of severely injured workers had a 15% increase in the total number of MSD outpatient claims and a 34% increase in the mean cost of MSD claims compared to family members of non-severely injured workers within 3 months after injury. Extrapolating cost results to the national level implies that severe occupational injury would be associated with between $29 and $33 million additional cost of family member outpatient MSD claims. CONCLUSION: Occupational injury can impose a formerly unrecognized health burden on family members of injured workers.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Family , Musculoskeletal Diseases/economics , Occupational Diseases/economics , Occupational Injuries/economics , Adult , Ambulatory Care/economics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Injuries/etiology , Regression Analysis , United States , Workers' Compensation/economics
4.
Am J Ind Med ; 49(11): 930-42, 2006 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16948157

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A significant and growing number of people work long hours. Research examining impacts is limited, but raises concerns about risks to the worker, the family, the employer, and the community. The purpose of this report, which is authored by the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) Long Work Hours Team, is to motivate and guide future research by proposing a framework for studying long work hours and discussing research gaps. METHODS: The NORA Long Work Hours Team examined research reports and literature reviews, and gathered input from a conference on long work hours organized by the Team and faculty from University of Maryland. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A framework is proposed for long work hours, including determinants, outcomes, and moderating factors of long work hours, suggesting that studies need to include more clear and complete descriptions of work schedules, worker characteristics, and the work environment, and need to consider a wider range of possible health, safety, social and economic outcomes for workers, families, employers, and the community. Additional studies are needed on vulnerable employee groups and those critical to public safety. More studies are also needed to develop interventions and test their effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Research Design , Workload , Age Factors , Health Status , Humans , Occupational Exposure , Occupational Health , Organizational Policy , Sex Factors , United States , Work Schedule Tolerance
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...