Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23984275

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that Alaska Native people have higher smoking prevalence than non-Natives. However, no population-based studies have explored whether smoking-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors also differ among Alaska Native people and non-Natives. OBJECTIVE: We compared current smoking prevalence and smoking-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of Alaska Native adults living in the state of Alaska with non-Natives. METHODS: We used Alaska Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data for 1996 to 2010 to compare smoking prevalence, consumption, and cessation- and second-hand smoke-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors among self-identified Alaska Native people and non-Natives. RESULTS: Current smoking prevalence was 41% (95% CI: 37.9%-44.4%) among Alaska Native people compared with 17.1% (95% CI: 15.9%-18.4%) among non-Natives. Among current every day smokers, Alaska Natives were much more likely to smoke less than 10 cigarettes per day (OR = 5.0, 95% CI: 2.6-9.6) than non-Natives. Compared with non-Native smokers, Alaska Native smokers were as likely to have made a past year quit attempt (OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 0.9-2.1), but the attempt was less likely to be successful (OR = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.2-0.9). Among current smokers, Alaska Natives were more likely to believe second-hand smoke (SHS) was very harmful (OR = 4.5, 95% CI: 2.8-7.2), to believe that smoking should not be allowed in indoor work areas (OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.1) or in restaurants (OR = 4.2, 95% CI: 2.5-6.9), to have a home smoking ban (OR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.6-3.9), and to have no home exposure to SHS in the past 30 days (OR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.5-3.6) than non-Natives. CONCLUSION: Although a disparity in current smoking exists, Alaska Native people have smoking-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors that are encouraging for reducing the burden of smoking in this population. Programs should support efforts to promote cessation, prevent relapse, and establish smoke-free environments.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice/ethnology , Indians, North American/psychology , Smoking/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alaska/epidemiology , Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System , Female , Humans , Indians, North American/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/psychology , Smoking Cessation/ethnology , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Tobacco Smoke Pollution , Young Adult
2.
Addict Behav ; 37(7): 862-5, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22421628

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The tobacco industry has promoted the use of smokeless tobacco (SLT) to smokers as a substitution for cigarettes when smoking is not possible, and some smokers are using SLT this way. However, few publications have examined recent trends in dual cigarette and SLT use (dual use) over time in the U.S. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined trends in the use of SLT among current, former and never cigarette smokers using data on adult (aged 18+ years) males (n=16,590) from the 1996-2008 Alaska Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). We also examined trends from 2004 to 2008 in cigarette consumption among dual users. RESULTS: Between 1996 and 2008, the overall prevalence of current SLT use and prevalence of current smoking among Alaskan men did not significantly change over time (p-value from age-adjusted models p=.63, p=.09, respectively). When we examined trends in SLT use by smoking status, we found that the prevalence of current SLT use remained unchanged between 1996 and 2008 among former and never smokers, but almost doubled among current smokers (age-adjusted p=.004). Between 2004 and 2008, cigarette consumption remained steady among current smokers who did not use SLT, but significantly decreased among dual users (age-adjusted p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that male smokers in Alaska are increasingly likely to use SLT, but do not appear to be switching to SLT use exclusively. We recommend that other state tobacco control programs examine trends in dual use to confirm our findings, and for programs to continue encouraging cessation of all tobacco products.


Subject(s)
Smoking/epidemiology , Tobacco, Smokeless , Adult , Alaska/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Smoking/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...