Measurement Assessment of Minimal Disease Activity In Psoriasis in Spain: A National Cross-Sectional Study. / Valoración de la medida de Actividad Mínima de Enfermedad en Psoriasis en España: estudio transversal nacional.

INTRODUCTION: In 2017, the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Psoriasis Working Group (PWG) designed the Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) criteria to determine the level of disease activity. We hereby present the results of an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study of the nationwide application of these criteria. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a non-randomized sampling, stratified to achieve autonomic and provincial representation of consecutive patients with psoriasis (Ps) vulgaris without active arthritis. A total of 830 patients were included: 493 men (59.5%), with a mean age of 51.4 years (SD, 14.2), from all autonomous regions of Spain (except for Ceuta and Melilla) and 44 (88%) out of the 50 provinces. A questionnaire was obtained with demographic data, DLQI, subjective assessment-on a scale from 0 to 10-of itching, erythema, desquamation, visibility, and the patients' PASI and BSA. RESULTS: More than 50% failed to meet the MDA criteria (491; 59.2%), with significant differences being reported by region, sex, and age. Additionally, significant differences were reported based on the therapy used (P<.001). The use of biological therapies was associated with higher MDA compliance compared to other therapies (59.4% vs 23.3%). No differences were reported among various biological therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of MDA compliance is low, with differences being based on geographic location, sex, age, and drug used, yet none of these factors separately justify them.

Pharmacogenetic biomarkers for secukinumab response in psoriasis patients in real-life clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Prediction of the response to a biological treatment in psoriasis patients would allow efficient treatment allocation. OBJECTIVE: To identify polymorphisms associated with secukinumab response in psoriasis patients in a daily practice setting. METHODS: We studied 180 SNPs in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis recruited from 15 Spanish hospitals. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated by absolute PASI ≤3 and ≤1 at 6 and 12 months. Individuals were genotyped using a custom Taqman array. Multiple logistic regression models were generated. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients were studied at 6 months, (67% achieved absolute PASI ≤ 3 and 65% PASI ≤ 1) and 162 at 12 months (75% achieved absolute PASI ≤ 3 and 64% PASI ≤ 1). Multivariable analysis showed the association of different sets of SNPs with the response to secukinumab. The model of absolute PASI≤3 at 6 months showed best values of sensitivity and specificity. Four SNPs were associated with the capability of achieving absolute PASI ≤ 3 at 6 months. rs1801274 (FCGR2A), rs2431697 (miR-146a) and rs10484554 (HLCw6) were identified as risk factors for failure to achieve absolute PASI≤3, while rs1051738 (PDE4A) was protective. AUC including these genotypes, weight of patients and history of biological therapy was 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.94), with a sensitivity of 48.6% and specificity of 95.7% to discriminate between both phenotypes. CONCLUSION: We have identified a series of polymorphisms associated with the response to secukinumab capable of predicting the potential response/non-response to this drug in patients with plaque psoriasis.

Management of Psoriasis During Preconception, Pregnancy, Postpartum, and Breastfeeding: A Consensus Statement. / Consenso sobre las actuaciones a seguir durante la edad fértil, el embarazo, el posparto y la lactancia en pacientes con psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence- and experience-based recommendations for the management of psoriasis during preconception, pregnancy, postpartum, and breastfeeding. METHODS: The nominal group technique and the Delphi method were used. Fifteen experts (12 dermatologists, 2 of whom were appointed coordinators; 1 rheumatologist; and 2 gynecologists) were selected to form an expert panel. Following a systematic review of the literature on fertility, pregnancy, postpartum, and breastfeeding in women with psoriasis, the coordinators drew up a series of preliminary recommendations for discussion by the panel at a nominal group meeting. The experts defined the scope, sections, and intended users of the statement and prepared a final list of recommendations. Consensus was obtained using a Delphi process in which an additional 51 dermatologists rated their level of agreement with each recommendation on a scale of 1 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). Consensus was defined by a score of 7 or higher assigned by at least 70% of participants. Level of evidence and strength of recommendation were reported using the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine categories. The final statement was approved by the expert panel. RESULTS: The resulting consensus statement includes 23 recommendations on preconception (fertility and contraception), pregnancy (planning, pharmacological management, and follow-up), and breastfeeding (management and follow-up). Consensus was achieved for all recommendations generated except one. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations for the better management of psoriasis in women of childbearing age could improve outcomes and prognosis.

Estudio Delphi para el uso de apremilast en la psoriasis / The Use of Apremilast in Psoriasis: A Delphi Study

ANTECEDENTES: El manejo de apremilast en la práctica clínica complementa la información procedente de los ensayos clínicos pivotales. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Tras una revisión de la literatura se consideraron, por parte de un panel de dermatólogos expertos en el manejo de la psoriasis, 5 áreas donde la evidencia sobre el uso de apremilast en la psoriasis moderada era insuficiente o controvertida, que fueron evaluadas a través de un cuestionario diseñado según la metodología Delphi. RESULTADOS: Se alcanzó consenso en 96 de los 143 ítems planteados (67%) (85 en el acuerdo y 11 en el desacuerdo). El objetivo terapéutico con apremilast debería ponderarse entre la respuesta clínica, la sintomatología asociada, la calidad de vida y la satisfacción del paciente. El perfil en el que el uso de apremilast se considera con mayores posibilidades de éxito sería el de un paciente con psoriasis moderada estable. La mayoría de los clínicos consideraron que apremilast es adecuado para pacientes en los que hayan fracasado o estén contraindicados los tratamientos convencionales, preferentemente de forma previa a la indicación de terapia biológica. Hubo consenso en reconocer apremilast como una opción terapéutica adecuada para el tratamiento en localizaciones difíciles, como la psoriasis palmoplantar y del cuero cabelludo. La necesidad de cribado, así como de su monitorización durante el seguimiento, se consideró menor que la de otros tratamientos sistémicos, convencionales y biológicos. CONCLUSIONES: Apremilast podría representar una opción terapéutica en un perfil de pacientes distinto al presentado en los ensayos clínicos. La ausencia de un consenso sobre la definición de psoriasis moderada, la escasa evidencia acerca del fármaco en la vida real, así como algunos aspectos relacionados con la tolerabilidad representan limitaciones a estas propuestas

BACKGROUND: Experience in the use of apremilast in clinical practice complements the information available from pivotal clinical trials. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Following a review of the literature, a panel of dermatologists with expertise in the management of psoriasis considered 5 scenarios in which the evidence supporting the use of apremilast to treat moderate psoriasis is insufficient or controversial. These scenarios were then assessed using a Delphi questionnaire. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 96 (67%) of the 143 items (positive in 85 and negative in 11). The therapeutic goal for apremilast should be based on 4 outcomes: clinical response, symptoms, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. The scenario in which the use of apremilast was considered to have the greatest possibility of success was in patients with stable moderate psoriasis. Most of the clinicians considered apremilast to be an appropriate treatment when conventional therapies fail or are contraindicated, preferably before the prescription of biologic therapy. Consensus was reached that apremilast is an appropriate treatment for psoriasis in difficult locations, such as the scalp or the palms and soles. It was also agreed that apremilast requires less prescreening and monitoring than other conventional and biologic systemic therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Apremilast could be a treatment option for patients with a different profile to that of clinical trial participants. The limitations of this proposal are the absence of consensus on the definition of moderate psoriasis, the lack of real-world evidence on the use of apremilast, and certain aspects related to tolerability

Body dysmorphic disorder in patients with acne: a multicentre study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is a mental disorder that is difficult to diagnose, causes a lot of suffering and is more prevalent in dermatology patients than in the general population. Our objective was to screen for possible cases of BDD in patients with acne and to determine the prevalence according to DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria, as well as to analyse the relationship between dermatological and sociodemographic variables. METHODS: A total of 245 patients diagnosed with acne in 11 dermatological centres in Spain were included in the study by members of the Aragon Psychodermatology Research Group and Spanish Research Group of Psychiatric Dermatology. We used the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire (BDDQ) as a screening tool. RESULTS: In our sample, we obtained a prevalence for BDD of 10.6% (95% CI: 7.6-13.6%). The prevalence was the same with DSM-IV or DSM-5 criteria. Possible cases of BDD were predominantly women (P = 0.021), and 56% had non-inflammatory lesions vs. 30% of negative patients (P = 0.002). Positive patients as possible cases of BDD spent more than two hours on average a day worrying about their appearance. Most people only worried about one part of their body (86%), and in 95% of the cases, the part of their body that worried them was the face. The three most frequent compulsive behaviours in patients who screened positive for BDD were mirror checking (90.7%), camouflaging (79.1%) and using make-up (72.1%). CONCLUSIONS: As a consequence of the high prevalence of possible cases of BDD in patients with acne observed in our study, there is a need for dermatologists to screen for BDD so that they can be referred to a mental health unit to confirm the diagnosis and be offered treatment to reduce the progression of psychosocial deterioration and the development of comorbid disorders.

The Use of Apremilast in Psoriasis: A Delphi Study. / Estudio Delphi para el uso de apremilast en la psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Experience in the use of apremilast in clinical practice complements the information available from pivotal clinical trials. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Following a review of the literature, a panel of dermatologists with expertise in the management of psoriasis considered 5 scenarios in which the evidence supporting the use of apremilast to treat moderate psoriasis is insufficient or controversial. These scenarios were then assessed using a Delphi questionnaire. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 96 (67%) of the 143 items (positive in 85 and negative in 11). The therapeutic goal for apremilast should be based on 4 outcomes: clinical response, symptoms, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. The scenario in which the use of apremilast was considered to have the greatest possibility of success was in patients with stable moderate psoriasis. Most of the clinicians considered apremilast to be an appropriate treatment when conventional therapies fail or are contraindicated, preferably before the prescription of biologic therapy. Consensus was reached that apremilast is an appropriate treatment for psoriasis in difficult locations, such as the scalp or the palms and soles. It was also agreed that apremilast requires less prescreening and monitoring than other conventional and biologic systemic therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Apremilast could be a treatment option for patients with a different profile to that of clinical trial participants. The limitations of this proposal are the absence of consensus on the definition of moderate psoriasis, the lack of real-world evidence on the use of apremilast, and certain aspects related to tolerability.

Lesiones tumorales cutáneas sobre linfedema crónico / Skin Tumors Arising on Chronic Lymphedema

No disponible

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for infective endocarditis in patients over 80 years.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of infective endocarditis is progressively increasing, especially in elderly patients. Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) is being an excellent alternative for treatment, but advanced age is one of the relative contraindications. The aim of this study is to compare the characteristics and prognosis of patients less or more than 80 years, treated with OPAT. METHODS: One hundred and ninety four patients were included between 1996 and 2015, 31 of them older than 80 years. RESULTS: The most frequently affected valve is the aortic one, mainly native valves. Most used antibiotics are ceftriaxone, ampicillin, cloxacillin and daptomycin. Differences in surgery (39.9% vs 9.7%, p=0.001) and use of infusion pump (55.2% vs 35.5%; p= 0.044) were observed, under 80 years and older respectively. No differences in readmissions and mortality were observed. CONCLUSIONS: OPAT could be considered an effective alternative for appropriately-selected elderly patients with infective endocarditis.

Lesiones nodulares periestomales / Nodular Peristomal Lesions

No disponible

Detección precoz de la enfermedad psicoemocional en dermatología / Early Detection of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders in Dermatology

Muchas enfermedades dermatológicas van asociadas a trastornos psiquiátricos. No es fácil la distinción entre la normalidad y el trastorno psiquiátrico cuando la intensidad de los síntomas psicológicos es leve, como suele ocurrir en dermatología. Por eso revisamos el concepto de trastorno psiquiátrico. Por otra parte, son necesarios instrumentos para detectar una enfermedad psicológica de forma precoz, cuando los síntomas son todavía menores. Para ello se han desarrollado cuestionarios breves, sencillos, autoadministrados por el propio paciente, que ayudan a dermatólogos y demás profesionales sanitarios a sospechar con alto grado de certeza la existencia de una enfermedad psiquiátrica. Nos centraremos en los cuestionarios más utilizados que detectan las 2 enfermedades psiquiátricas más frecuentes: ansiedad y depresión. Por último, describiremos las circunstancias en las que es recomendable derivar a un paciente dermatológico al psiquiatra para que sea este quien le siga de forma reglada

Many skin diseases are associated with mental disorders. When the psychological symptoms are mild, as is often the case in dermatology, it can be difficult to distinguish between normality and the manifestations of a mental disorder. To facilitate the distinction we review the concept of mental disorder in the present article. It is also important to have instruments that can facilitate early detection of psychological disease, i.e. when the symptoms are still mild. Short, simple, self-administered questionnaires have been developed to help dermatologists and other health professionals identify the presence of a mental disorder with a high degree of certainty. In this article, we focus on the questionnaires most often used to detect the 2 most common mental disorders: anxiety and depression. Finally, we describe the circumstances in which it is advisable to refer a dermatological patient to a psychiatrist, who can diagnose and treat the mental disorder in accordance with standard protocols