Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 29
Filter
1.
Eur Heart J ; 41(27): 2589-2596, 2020 07 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32484542

ABSTRACT

The new European Union (EU) law governing the regulatory approval of medical devices that entered into force in May 2017 will now take effect from 26 May 2021. Here, we consider how it will change daily practice for cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, and healthcare professionals. Clinical evidence for any high-risk device must be reported by the manufacturer in a Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance (SSCP) that will be publicly available in the European Union Database on Medical Devices (Eudamed) maintained by the European Commission; this will facilitate evidence-based choices of which devices to recommend. Hospitals must record all device implantations, and each high-risk device will be trackable by Unique Device Identification (UDI). Important new roles are envisaged for clinicians, scientists, and engineers in EU Expert Panels-in particular to scrutinize clinical data submitted by manufacturers for certain high-risk devices and the evaluations of that data made by notified bodies. They will advise manufacturers on the design of their clinical studies and recommend to regulators when new technical specifications or guidance are needed. Physicians should support post-market surveillance by reporting adverse events and by contributing to comprehensive medical device registries. A second law on In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices will take effect from 2022. We encourage all healthcare professionals to contribute proactively to these new systems, in order to enhance the efficacy and safety of high-risk devices and to promote equitable access to effective innovations. The European Society of Cardiology will continue to advise EU regulators on appropriate clinical evaluation of high-risk devices.


Subject(s)
Cardiology , European Union , Evidence-Based Practice , Humans
2.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 13(2): 253-256, 2020 01 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31973797

ABSTRACT

As transcatheter valves are offered to progressively lower-risk patients, it is increasingly important to have accurate data about durability. Structural valve deterioration (SVD) implies an adverse change in the morphology of the leaflets and function of the valve compared with the state at implantation. However, a recent European statement allows SVD to be defined solely by a threshold mean gradient ≥20 mm Hg. Absolute mean gradients above this threshold may be observed immediately after implantation and represent patient-prosthesis mismatch and not SVD. This paper describes a definition of SVD more in keeping with routine clinical practice, incorporating a change in leaflet morphology and an increase in the grade of transvalvar regurgitation or an increase in gradient from the post-implantation study.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve/surgery , Data Accuracy , Data Collection , Evidence-Based Medicine , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Prosthesis Failure , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Data Collection/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Humans , Prosthesis Design , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Terminology as Topic , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
4.
Lancet ; 392(10146): 521-530, 2018 08 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30017550

ABSTRACT

To use medical devices rationally, health-care professionals must base their choices of which devices to recommend for individual patients on an objective appraisal of their safety and clinical efficacy. The evidence submitted by manufacturers when seeking approval of their high-risk devices must be publicly available, including technical performance and premarket clinical studies. Giving physicians access to this information supplements the peer-reviewed scientific literature and might be essential for comparing alternative devices within any class. Interested patients should be encouraged to review the evidence for any device that has been recommended for them. The new EU law on medical devices states that the manufacturer is to prepare a summary of the evidence for any implantable or high-risk device. Defining its content, however, has been delegated to implementing legislation, which is now being considered. From a clinical perspective, it is imperative that all evidence reviewed by notified bodies and regulatory authorities is disclosed-with the exception, if justified, only of technical specifications that are considered confidential or manufacturing details that are protected as intellectual property-and public access to this evidence must be guaranteed by EU law. From ethical and other perspectives, there are no grounds for less clinical evidence being available to health-care professionals about the medical devices that they use than is already available for new pharmaceutical products. Full transparency is needed; without it, informed decisions relating to the use of new medical devices will remain impossible.


Subject(s)
Equipment and Supplies , Evidence-Based Medicine , Access to Information , Device Approval , Equipment and Supplies/adverse effects , Equipment and Supplies/standards , Europe , European Union , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Humans
5.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 98(5): 1865-74, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25258160

ABSTRACT

This article summarizes the long-term clinical results of the Food and Drug Administration-approved heart valves, provides current updates to the objective performance criteria (OPC) used to evaluate new heart valve prostheses, and documents the steps that the International Organization for Standardization Committee used to arrive at the updated OPC. Data were extracted from 19 Food and Drug Administration summaries of safety and effectiveness data reports (31 series) and 56 literature articles (85 series) published from 1999 to 2012. The OPC were calculated for five valve-related complications by valve type (mechanical and bioprosthetic) and valve position (aortic and mitral).


Subject(s)
Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Humans , Prosthesis Design , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
6.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 37(3): 552-6, 2010 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19717307

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma (DMPM) remains unclear. We report our 30-year surgical experience with DMPM with emphasis on surgical procedure and post-operative adjuvant therapy. METHODS: During the period of the study, 217 patients with DMPM were referred for surgical opinion. Patients who only had pleural biopsies were excluded (n=78). Consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment were included (n=139). Surgical options were extra-pleural pneumonectomy (EPP) for Butchart stage I disease in clinically fit patients (n=49) or pleurectomy/decortication in patients who were either not fit for EPP or had advanced disease (Butchart stage II and III) or both (n=90). Post-operative adjuvant therapy included either chemotherapy, radiotherapy, both or none. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 10.0 months. The longest survival (median 26.0 months, IQR: 11.14-40.9 months) occurred in the pleurectomy/decortication group who received both post-operative chemotherapy and radiotherapy (n=24) (p<0.001). EPP whether or not combined with adjuvant therapy provided no significant survival advantage in comparison to pleurectomy/decortication (overall median survival 10.3 months vs 10.1 months, p=0.09). On univariate analysis, pleurectomy/decortication combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy was the strongest predictor of prolonged survival (Hazard Ratio=3.6). Multivariate analysis with the inclusion of histological type, surgical procedure and type of adjuvant therapy, EPP without adjuvant therapy was an independent risk-factor for decreased survival (Hazard Ratio=9.2). CONCLUSIONS: In this series, cytoreductive surgery combined with post-operative adjuvant therapy provided better survival despite either advanced disease or surgically less fit patients. Thus, pleurectomy/decortication may be the procedure of choice, given that neither surgical procedure (EPP or PD) is not curative.


Subject(s)
Mesothelioma/surgery , Pleural Neoplasms/surgery , Pneumonectomy/methods , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Humans , Male , Mesothelioma/pathology , Mesothelioma/therapy , Middle Aged , Pleural Neoplasms/pathology , Pleural Neoplasms/therapy , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Treatment Outcome
12.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 32(11): 609-61, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17976510

ABSTRACT

The Euro Heart Survey on valvular heart disease included 5001 patients from 92 centers in 25 European countries in 2001: 71.9% had native valve disease and 28.1% had previously undergone valve surgery. Aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) accounted for 43.1 and 33.6%, respectively, of single-valve diseases and were mostly caused by degenerative diseases. Mean age was 69 and 65 years, respectively, and at least one comorbidity was present in 36.3% of patients with AS and 41.7% with MR. Analysis of the therapeutic decision in patients with severe valve diseases showed that symptomatic patients were frequently denied surgery (32.3% in AS after the age of 75 and 51.3% in MR), more on the basis of age and left ventricular function than comorbidities. There was a better concordance between practice and guidelines concerning interventions in asymptomatic patients. These findings underline the need for better implementation of guidelines.


Subject(s)
Heart Valve Diseases/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/epidemiology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/etiology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/pathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/therapy , Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Comorbidity , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Heart Valve Diseases/etiology , Heart Valve Diseases/pathology , Heart Valve Diseases/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/epidemiology , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/pathology , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Analysis , White People
13.
Eur Heart J ; 28(11): 1358-65, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17350971

ABSTRACT

AIM: To identify the proportion and characteristics of patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) who are denied surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Euro Heart Survey on valvular heart disease, 396 patients had severe symptomatic MR as assessed by Doppler-echocardiography (grade > or =3/4) and New York Heart Association class II or greater. Patient characteristics were analysed according to the decision to operate or not. A decision not to operate was taken in 193 patients (49%). In multivariable analysis, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [OR = 1.39 per 10% decrease, 95% CI (1.17-1.66), P = 0.0002], non-ischaemic aetiology [OR = 4.44, 95% CI (1.96-10.76), P = 0.0006], older age [OR = 1.40 per 10-year increase, 95% CI (1.15-1.72), P = 0.001], increased Charlson comorbidity index [OR = 1.38 per 1 point increase, 95% CI (1.12-1.72), P = 0.004], and grade 3 MR [OR = 2.23, 95% CI (1.28-3.29), P = 0.005] were associated with the decision not to operate. One-year survival was 96.0 +/- 1.4% in patients with a positive decision for intervention vs. 89.5 +/- 2.3% in those with a negative decision (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Surgery was denied in 49% of patients with severe symptomatic MR. Impaired LVEF, older age, and comorbidity were the most striking characteristics of patients who were denied surgery. The weight of age and LVEF in the decision do not seem justified according to current knowledge.


Subject(s)
Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Refusal to Treat/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Coronary Artery Bypass/statistics & numerical data , Decision Making , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Referral and Consultation , Regression Analysis , Stroke Volume , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
14.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 132(1): 113-5, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16798310

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Typical pulmonary carcinoid tumors represent less than 1% of lung tumors. In a subgroup of patients with this abnormality, the tumor is entirely endobronchial. We assessed the long-term outcome of such cases in which the patient was managed with endobronchial resection only. METHODS: Patients who underwent bronchoscopic resection for a typical carcinoid tumor were identified through case records and histology reports. Data were collected retrospectively, but follow-up was on a prospective basis through the outpatient clinic. RESULTS: Between 1978 and 2004, 28 patients underwent bronchoscopic resection of endobronchial carcinoid tumors. The mean age was 49 years (standard deviation, 19 years; age range, 11-82 years), with 46% (13/28) of the patients being male. The tumor arose from the left bronchial tree in 61% (17/28), with the most common site being the left lower lobe bronchus (8/28). On average, patients required 5 bronchoscopic resections to achieve complete resection. The median follow-up was 8.8 years (interquartile range, 4.5-13.7 years). At 1 and 10 years, 100% and 94% of patients were disease free, respectively. The 1- and 10-year survivals were 89% (interquartile range, 84%-93%) and 84% (interquartile range, 77%-91%), respectively. CONCLUSION: In a selected group of patients, proximal polypoid typical bronchial carcinoid tumors can be treated endobronchially with good outcome.


Subject(s)
Bronchial Neoplasms/surgery , Bronchoscopy , Carcinoid Tumor/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
16.
Ann Pharmacother ; 40(3): 397-401, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16507614

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The dosage requirement of warfarin to achieve a given international normalized ratio (INR) often varies considerably between the immediate postoperative period and long-term follow-up in patients with prosthetic heart valves, leading to INR instability. OBJECTIVE: To document the extent of warfarin sensitivity in a prospective study of patients receiving heart valve replacements. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory data regarding anticoagulation for 111 patients who received warfarin following heart valve replacement were collected during their hospital stay (induction period) and between 1 and 3 months after surgery (follow-up period). RESULTS: Mean patient age was 65.39 +/- 10.55 years (range 29-85), with 66 men. The mean INR value during the follow-up period was, on average, 0.21 higher than the induction period (2.81 +/- 0.5 vs 2.6 +/- 0.6; p = 0.007). The mean follow-up warfarin dose was 1.54 mg higher than the mean induction warfarin dose (5.09 +/- 2.03 vs 3.55 +/- 1.94 mg; p < 0.001). The warfarin dose index, which indicates relative sensitivity of warfarin, decreased from 1.16 to 0.65 (p < 0.001). Although the INR values during the induction and follow-up periods were similar, the dose requirement in the follow-up period was, on average, 43% higher than that of the induction period. CONCLUSIONS: Immediately after heart valve replacement, patients are more sensitive to warfarin and should receive a lower warfarin dose during the initial phase of oral anticoagulation treatment. This enhanced sensitivity decreases with time. Patients require frequent monitoring and are likely to need an increase in the warfarin dose to avoid insufficient anticoagulation during the early follow-up period.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Postoperative Complications/blood , Postoperative Complications/chemically induced , Warfarin/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , International Normalized Ratio , Male , Middle Aged , Partial Thromboplastin Time , Prospective Studies
17.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 81(2): 716-8, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16427882

ABSTRACT

Lung hernia is a rare condition. Approximately one third of cases occur in the cervical position. We report a case of bilateral cervical lung hernia associated with neuralgic pain that was repaired using bovine pericardium and biological glue.


Subject(s)
Herniorrhaphy , Lung Diseases/surgery , Adult , Functional Laterality , Hernia/complications , Hernia/pathology , Humans , Lung Diseases/complications , Lung Diseases/pathology , Male , Neck/pathology , Nerve Compression Syndromes/etiology , Pain/etiology , Treatment Outcome
19.
Eur Heart J ; 26(22): 2463-71, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16103039

ABSTRACT

Approximately 50,000 valve replacement operations take place in Europe annually and almost as many valve repair procedures. Previous European guidelines on management of patients after valve surgery were last published in 1995 and were limited to recommendations about antithrombotic prophylaxis. American guidelines covering the broader topic of the investigation and treatment of patients with valve disease were published in 1998 but devoted relatively little space to post-surgical management. This document represents the consensus view of a committee drawn from three European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Groups (WG): the WG on Valvular Heart Disease, the WG on Thrombosis, and the WG on Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology. In almost all areas of patient management after valve surgery, randomized trials and meta-analyses do not exist. Such randomized trials as do exist are very few in number, are narrowly focused with small numbers, have limited general applicability, and do not lend themselves to meta-analysis because of widely divergent methodologies and different patient characteristics. Recommendations are therefore almost entirely based on non-randomized studies and relevant basic science.


Subject(s)
Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Postoperative Care/methods , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Endocarditis, Bacterial/drug therapy , Female , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Heart Valve Diseases/rehabilitation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Hemolysis , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/surgery , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Thromboembolism/prevention & control
20.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 28(4): 655-6, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16125958

ABSTRACT

Isolated pleural metastatic melanoma is an uncommon clinical condition. Clinical diagnosis can be difficult and therapeutic options are limited. We describe a case where there was isolated pleural metastasis, 10 years following complete excision of a superficial melanotic lesion, which presented like a malignant mesothelioma ('pseudomesothelioma').


Subject(s)
Melanoma/secondary , Mesothelioma/secondary , Pleural Neoplasms/secondary , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Melanoma/surgery , Mesothelioma/surgery , Middle Aged , Pleural Neoplasms/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...