Working to Full Scope: The Reorganization of Nursing Work in Two Canadian Community Hospitals.

Work relationships between registered nurses (RNs) and practical nurses (LPNs) are changing as new models of nursing care delivery are introduced to create more flexibility for employers. In Canada, a team-based, hospital nursing care delivery model, known as Care Delivery Model Redesign (CDMR), redesigned a predominantly RN-based staffing model to a functional team consisting of fewer RNs and more LPNs. The scope of practice for LPNs was expanded, and unregulated health care assistants introduced. This study began from the standpoint of RNs and LPNs to understand their experiences working on redesigned teams by focusing on discourses activated in social settings. Guided by institutional ethnography, the conceptual and textual resources nurses are drawing on to understand these changing work relationships are explicated. We show how the institutional goals embedded in CDMR not only mediate how nurses work together, but how they subordinate holistic standards of nursing toward fragmented, task-oriented, divisions of care.

Experiences of pre-licensure or pre-registration health professional students and their educators in working with intra-professional teams: a qualitative systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Inter-professional initiatives are prevalent in the healthcare landscape, requiring professionals to collaborate effectively to provide quality patient care. Little attention has been given to intra-professional relationships, where professionals within one disciplinary domain (such as degree and diploma nursing students) collaborate to provide care. New care models are being introduced where baccalaureate and diploma students of a particular discipline (such as nursing, occupational therapy, dentistry or physiotherapy) work closely together in teams to deliver care. Questions thus arise as to how students and educators learn to work on intra-professional teams. OBJECTIVES: To identify and synthesize evidence regarding experiences of pre-licensure health professional students and their educators on intra-professional teams and to draw recommendations to enhance policy and/or curriculum development. INCLUSION CRITERIA TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS: Pre-licensure students and educators, focusing on regulated health professions that have had more than one point of entry into practice. PHENOMENA OF INTEREST: Experiences of intra-professional team learning or teaching within various entry-to-practice categories of a particular health-related discipline. TYPES OF STUDIES: Eight qualitative studies were included in the review. Seven studies were descriptive in nature; one study was a critical analysis. SEARCH STRATEGY: A comprehensive search of various databases was conducted between June 2, 2015 and August 16, 2015, and repeated in March 2016. The search considered all studies reported and published from January 1, 2001 to March 7, 2016. Only studies published in English were included in this review. METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY: Included papers were of low-to-moderate quality; however, it is important to consider that post-positivist assumptions underpinned much of the primary research, which could explain why researcher positionality and/or influence on the research would not be addressed. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted using the standardized data extraction tool from the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-QARI). The data extracted included descriptive details about the phenomenon of interest, populations and study methods. DATA SYNTHESIS: Research findings were pooled using the JBI-QARI. Sixty-eight findings were organized into nine categories based on similarity in meaning. RESULTS: Four synthesized findings reveal how students value intra-professional learning experiences. These experiences build positive collaborative relationships (including trust and respect); however, educator and staff attitudes and conversations create hierarchies in academic and clinical contexts resulting in tension between student groups. CONCLUSION: Despite its challenges, shared learning experiences assist students to understand each other's roles, develop communication and collaborative competencies, develop comprehensive care plans, provide more efficient care and help prepare them for their future roles as healthcare professionals. Various contextual elements could either hinder or facilitate shared learning experiences.

Educational silos in nursing education: a critical review of practical nurse education in Canada.

Changes to practical nurse education (with expanded scopes of practice) align with the increasing need for nurses and assistive personnel in global acute care contexts. A case in point is this critical exploration of Canadian practical nursing literature, undertaken to reveal predominating discourses and relationships to nursing disciplinary knowledge. The objectives of this poststructural critical review were to identify dominant discourses in practical nurse education literature and to analyze these discourses to uncover underlying beliefs, constructed truths, assumptions, ambiguities and sources of knowledge within the discursive landscape. Predominant themes in the discourses surrounding practical nurse education included conversations about the nurse shortage, expanded roles, collaboration, evidence-based practice, role confusion, cost/efficiency, the history of practical nurse education and employer interests. The complex relationships between practical nursing and the disciplinary landscape of nursing are revealed in the analysis of discourses related to the purpose(s) of practical nurse education, curricula/educational programming, relationships between RN and PN education and the role of nursing knowledge. Power dynamics related to employer needs and interests, as well as educational silos and the nature of women's work, are also revealed within the intersection of various discourses.