Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Surg Educ ; 76(4): 931-935, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30738729

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To define cognitive apprenticeship and describe how it can be applied to orthopedic education. DESIGN: Traditional apprenticeships have been used through history as a teaching model for wide variety of skills. These apprenticeships are characterized by practical, on-the-job training in which the apprentice observes and assists a master in the completion of a task, and thereby learns the skills needed to complete that task on his or her own. RESULTS: Cognitive apprenticeship is differentiated from the traditional apprenticeship model primarily by its educational goals. Cognitive apprenticeships are used to teach skills which require internal though processes which cannot be readily observed externally by the teacher or the student. CONCLUSION: Here, we review the history of the cognitive apprenticeship concept, its basic principles, its applications to a wide variety of educational circumstances, and its potential use a framework for developing orthopedic curricula.


Subject(s)
Clinical Clerkship/methods , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Internship and Residency/methods , Orthopedic Procedures/education , Adult , Female , Humans , Learning Curve , Male , Models, Educational , Surgeons/education
2.
J Environ Manage ; 153: 153-62, 2015 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25697902

ABSTRACT

Within the field of water resource management, Group Model Building (GMB) is a growing method used to engage stakeholders in the development of models that describe environmental and socioeconomic systems to create and test policy alternatives. While there is significant focus on improving stakeholder engagement, there is a lack of studies specifically looking at the experiences of marginalized communities and the barriers that prevent their fuller participation in the decision-making process. This paper explores the common issues and presents recommended improved practices, based on anti-oppression, related to the stages of problem framing, stakeholder identification and selection, workshop preparation, and workshop facilitation. For problem defining and stakeholder selection, the major recommendations are to engage diverse stakeholder communities from the earliest stages and give them control over framing the project scope. With regards to planning the model building workshops, it is recommended that the facilitation team work closely with marginalized stakeholders to highlight and address barriers that would prevent their inclusion. With the actual facilitation of the workshops, it is best to employ activities that allow stakeholders to provide knowledge and input in mediums that are most comfortable to them; additionally, the facilitation team needs to be able to challenge problematic interpersonal interactions as they manifest within conversations. This article focuses on building comfortability with political language so that the systemic oppression in which existing participatory processes occur can be understood, thus allowing GMB practitioners to engage in social justice efforts.


Subject(s)
Community Participation , Conservation of Natural Resources/methods , Decision Making , Water Resources , Social Justice
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...