A Protocol for Comprehensive Analysis of Gait in Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.

This is a protocol for comprehensive analysis of gait and affecting factors in individuals with incomplete paraplegia due to spinal cord injury (SCI). A SCI is a devastating event affecting both sensory and motor functions. Due to better care, the SCI population is changing, with a greater proportion retaining impaired ambulatory function. Optimizing ambulatory function after SCI remains challenging. To investigate factors influencing optimal ambulation, a multi-professional research project was grounded with expertise from clinical rehabilitation, neurophysiology, and biomechanical engineering from Karolinska Institutet, the Spinalis Unit at Aleris Rehab Station (Sweden's largest center for specialized neurorehabilitation), and the Promobilia MoveAbility Lab at KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Ambulatory adults with paraplegia will be consecutively invited to participate. Muscle strength, sensitivity, and spasticity will be assessed, and energy expenditure, 3D movements, and muscle function (EMG) during gait and submaximal contractions will be analyzed. Innovative computational modeling and data-driven analyses will be performed, including the identification of clusters of similar movement patterns among the heterogeneous population and analyses that study the link between complex sensorimotor function and movement performance. These results may help optimize ambulatory function for persons with SCI and decrease the risk of secondary conditions during gait with a life-long perspective.

Effects of the SmartDrive on mobility, activity, and shoulder pain among manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury - a prospective long-term cohort pilot study.

PURPOSE: to investigate long-term effects of SmartDrive on mobility, everyday activity, and shoulder pain among spinal cord injured manual wheelchairs users. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective pilot intervention study was conducted at Spinalis/Aleris Rehab Station, Sweden. Participants were consecutively invited when evaluated for SmartDrive prescription. Assessments were done at baseline, intervention (use of SmartDrive), and after six months. A smartwatch registered wheelchair utilization including push intensity and pushes/day. Wheelchair Outcome Measure, pain rating instruments including Wheelchair User's Shoulder Pain Index, a wheelchair test, and semi-structured interviews were used. Descriptive statistics and content analysis approach were used. RESULTS: Twenty-five persons were screened, six of 14 included completed the study. Drop-out reasons were not related to SmartDrive for five of the eight persons. After intervention, there was a tendency of decreased pain (median (IQR) 5/10 (2.6-6.6) vs 2.5 (2-3.2). All participants reported increased satisfaction of performance when "taking a walk", from median (IQR) 45/100 (27-70) at baseline to 95 (80-100) at 6 months. Two persons who could not ascend a slope at baseline could manage using the SmartDrive. Interviews revealed that the in general positive response persisted at six months. Also, with the SmartDrive the participants could go out despite pain, providing a sense of freedom and independence. Three incidents were reported. CONCLUSION: This long-term pilot study indicates that a SmartDrive might be a valuable assistive device to promote mobility despite of shoulder pain. All participants considered it easy to use and experienced increased independence, however skills training and follow-ups are necessary. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONA Rear Drive Power Assist Device (RD-PAD) could increase satisfaction with self-selected activities.A RD-PAD could increase functional mobility by facilitating propelling longer distances and steeper slopes.A RD-PAD could improve perseverance of daily activities in spite of shoulder pain.A RD-PAD could be a valuable assistive aid for persons with paraplegia with different level of wheelchair skills but with good self-awareness regarding their abilities.Thorough assessment of initial wheelchair skills, training, and follow-up are important to enhance safety and maximize performance when using the RD-PAD.

Considerations on the psychometric properties and validity of the Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditons Scale.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional validation study. OBJECTIVES: Explore psychometric properties of Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale (SCI-SCS). SETTING: Two Scandinavian rehabilitation centres. METHODS: Included were 224 consecutive patients attending regular follow-up at least 1 year after a traumatic SCI. Mean age was 49.6 (SD 14.9) years. SCI-SCS floor and ceiling effect examined. Construct validity was investigated by confirmatory factor analysis and correlation analysis, and reliability by Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: SCI-SCS showed no floor or ceiling effect. Two out of four earlier reported latent factors ("Genitourinary and bowel", "Muscle structures and pain") were confirmed. The global Cronbach's alpha of SCI-SCS was 0.65 and 0.22-0.61 for the four latent factors. The SCI-SCS sum score showed low correlation to quality of life (QoL) measured by EQ5 VAS (rs = -0.47, p < 0.001). Likewise, the sum score correlations to QoL-general and QoL-physical health (International SCI QoL Basic Dataset) were low (rs = -0.36, p < 0.001 and rs = -0.37, p < 0.001, respectively). The scale item Muscle Spasms correlated moderately to ratings on Spasm Frequency (rs = 0.59, p < 0.001) and Spasm Intensity (rs = 0.56, p < 0.001) scales. Chronic Pain and Joint and Muscle Pain correlated to patient reported number of pain sites and level of pain (International SCI Pain Basic Dataset 1.0) (rs = 0.31 p < 0.001 and rs = 0.47, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: SCI-SCS is a relevant instrument for giving clinicians and researchers an overview of the individual recent experiences with secondary conditions. However, the instrument could benefit from a clearer definition of the construct secondary conditions, a scale revision and a consideration of whether to add other experienced secondary conditions.

Sound psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self-Report.

OBJECTIVE: To describe data completeness, targeting and reliability of the Swedish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self-Report (s-SCIM-SR). DESIGN: Translation and reliability study. SUBJECTS: Programme participants (n = 48) and peer mentors (n = 42) with spinal cord injury enrolled in the INTERnational Project for the Evaluation of "activE Rehabilitation" (inter-PEER). METHODS: The translation process was based on guidelines/recommendations, and involved expert competence, including consumers. The s-SCIM-SR was distributed online, once for programme participants and twice for peer mentors. RESULTS: Sixty-nine individuals (77%) obtained a total score. Most missing data were found in the items Respiration and Using the toilet. Cronbach's alpha for the full scale was 0.89, for Self-care 0.92, for Respiration and sphincter management 0.37 and for Mobility 0.86. The intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent for all subscales and the full scale. Measures of variability showed high sensitivity to changes and Bland Altman analyses revealed no systematic changes between evaluation points. CONCLUSION: These results support the data completeness, targeting and reliability of the Swedish version of the SCIM-SR. However, some problems were found in the subscale Respiration and sphincter management. The s-SCIM-SR can be considered psychometrically sound and suitable to assess physical independence among persons with spinal cord injury in Swedish community settings.

Predictors of falls in persons with spinal cord injury-a prospective study using the Downton fall risk index and a single question of previous falls.

STUDY DESIGN: Prediction study. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prediction accuracy of the Downton fall risk index (DFRI) and a question of falls the previous year; further to examine the association between time to first fall and risk indicators for falls in wheelchair users and ambulatory persons with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). SETTING: Two SCI centres in Norway and Sweden (Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Rehab Station Stockholm /Spinalis). METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-four persons with traumatic SCI, ≥1 year post-injury, ≥18 years participated. Prospective falls were reported by text messages every second week for one year. Sensitivity, specificity and time to first fall (Kaplan Meier) were investigated for DFRI and the question of falls in the previous year. DFRI ≥3 was defined as a high risk of falls. Cox survival analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios for functional independence, gait speed and fear of falling. RESULTS: The sensitivity was 36-57% for DFRI and 82-89% for the question of falls, while specificity was 74-83%, and 34-49%. For DFRI, time to first fall was shorter in the high-risk group, for both wheelchair users (p = 0.005) and ambulatory persons (p = 0.006). Falls previous year increased the hazard ratio of falls for wheelchair users (HR = 3.35, 95% CI = 1.86 to 6.02) but not for ambulatory persons. CONCLUSIONS: Falls in the previous year showed a better predictive accuracy than DFRI due to the low sensitivity of DFRI. As previous falls had low specificity, it still remains difficult to predict falls in those who have not fallen yet.

Falls and fear of falling predict future falls and related injuries in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury: a longitudinal observational study.

QUESTIONS: What is the 1-year incidence of falls and injurious falls in a representative cohort of community-dwelling ambulatory individuals with chronic spinal cord injury? What are the predictors of recurrent falls (more than two/year) and injurious falls in this population? DESIGN: One-year longitudinal observational multi-centre study. PARTICIPANTS: A representative sample of 68 (of 73 included) community-dwelling ambulatory individuals with traumatic SCI attending regular follow-up programs at rehabilitation centres. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were incidence and predictors of recurrent falls (more than two/year) and injurious falls reported every 2 weeks for 1year. RESULTS: A total of 48% of participants reported recurrent falls. Of the 272 reported falls, 41% were injurious. Serious injuries were experienced by 4% of participants, all of whom were women. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that recurrent falls in the previous year (OR=111, 95% CI=8.6 to 1425), fear of falling (OR=6.1, 95% CI=1.43 to 26) and longer time taken to walk 10m (OR=1.3, 95% CI=1.0 to 1.7) were predictors of recurrent falls. Fear of falling (OR=4.3, 95% CI=1.3 to 14) and recurrent falls in the previous year (OR=4.2, 95% CI=1.2 to 14) were predictors of injurious falls. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory individuals have a high risk of falling and of fall-related injuries. Fall history, fear of falling and walking speed could predict recurrent falls and injurious falls. Further studies with larger samples are needed to validate these findings. [Jørgensen V, Butler Forslund E, Opheim A, Franzén E, Wahman K, Hultling C, Seiger Å, Ståhle A, Stanghelle JK, Roaldsen KS (2017) Falls and fear of falling predict future falls and related injuries in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury: a longitudinal observational study. Journal of Physiotherapy 63: 108-113].

Factors Associated With Recurrent Falls in Individuals With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with recurrent falls in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional multicenter study. SETTING: Two specialized rehabilitation centers. PARTICIPANTS: Included: individuals with traumatic SCI ≥1 year postinjury who were aged ≥18 years. Excluded: individuals with motor complete injuries above C5 or below L5. The study sample comprised participants (N=224; 151 wheelchair users, 73 ambulatory; 77% men; mean age ± SD, 50±15y; median time since injury, 15y [range, 1-56y]) who were consecutively recruited at regular follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Primary outcome was factors associated with recurrent falls (defined as low frequent [0-2] or recurrent [>2]) the previous year. Independent variables were demographic data, wheelchair user or ambulatory, work, health-related quality of life, risk willingness, alcohol consumption, ability to get up from the ground, and exercise habits. RESULTS: Fifty percent reported recurrent falls. In the final multiple logistic regression model, ambulation (odds ratio [OR]=2.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-5.37), ability to get up from the ground (OR=2.22; 95% CI, 1.21-4.10), and regular exercise (OR=1.86; 95% CI, 1.05-3.31) were associated with recurrent falls (P≤.05), and with increasing age the OR decreased (OR=.97; 95% CI, .95-.99). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with SCI should be considered at risk of recurrent falls, and thereby at risk of fall-related injuries. Fall prevention programs should be focused on ambulatory, younger, and more active individuals who had the highest risks for recurrent falls.