Using antibody directed phototherapy to target oesophageal adenocarcinoma with heterogeneous HER2 expression.

Early oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OA) and pre-neoplastic dysplasia may be treated with endoscopic resection and ablative techniques such as photodynamic therapy (PDT). Though effective, discrete areas of disease may be missed leading to recurrence. PDT further suffers from the side effects of off-target photosensitivity. A tumour specific and light targeted therapeutic agent with optimised pharmacokinetics could be used to destroy residual cancerous cells left behind after resection. A small molecule antibody-photosensitizer conjugate was developed targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). This was tested in an in vivo mouse model of human OA using a xenograft flank model with clinically relevant low level HER2 expression and heterogeneity. In vitro we demonstrate selective binding of the conjugate to tumour versus normal tissue. Light dependent cytotoxicity of the phototherapy agent in vitro was observed. In an in vivo OA mouse xenograft model the phototherapy agent had desirable pharmacokinetic properties for tumour uptake and blood clearance time. PDT treatment caused tumour growth arrest in all the tumours despite the tumours having a clinically defined low/negative HER2 expression level. This new phototherapy agent shows therapeutic potential for treatment of both HER2 positive and borderline/negative OA.

Long-term outcomes of the randomized controlled trial comparing 5-aminolaevulinic acid and Photofrin photodynamic therapy for Barrett's oesophagus related neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was used as therapy for early neoplasia associated with Barrett's oesophagus (BE). This is 5-year follow-up of patients enrolled into randomised controlled trial of 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) vs. Photofrin PDT. METHODS: Biopsies were taken from original Barrett's segment during endoscopic follow up using Seattle protocol. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) ± radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was preferred therapy in patients who failed PDT and/or had recurrent neoplasia. RESULTS: Fifty eight of 64 patients enrolled in the original trial were followed up including 31 patients treated with ALA PDT (17 patients with ≤6 cm, 14 patients with >6 cm segment of BE) and 27 treated with Photofrin PDT (14 patients with ≤6 cm, 13 patients with >6 cm BE). Initial success was achieved in 65% (20/31) ALA and 48% (13/27) Photofrin patients (p = .289). Thirty five percent patients (7/20) relapsed in ALA group and 54% (7/13) relapsed in Photofrin group (p = .472). At a median follow-up of 67 months, no significant difference was found in long-term complete reversal of intestinal metaplasia (CR-IM) and complete reversal of dysplasia (CR-D) between ALA and Photofrin groups (78% vs. 63%; p = .18; 90% vs. 76%; p = .26). Original length of BE did not alter long-term outcome. Four patients from each group progressed to invasive oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Initial success of ALA PDT was associated with significantly better likelihood of long-term remission (p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Initial response to PDT plays key role in long term outcome. RFA ± EMR have, however, become preferred minimally invasive ablative therapy for BE-related neoplasia due to poor efficacy of PDT.

Esophageal neoplasia arising from subsquamous buried glands after an apparently successful photodynamic therapy or radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's associated neoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are effective non-surgical options for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE) associated neoplasia. Development of subsquamous intestinal metaplasia after successful PDT and/or RFA is a recognized phenomenon; however, the occurrence of neoplasia arising from buried glands is a rare complication. METHODS: This is a prospective case series of patients treated with PDT and/or RFA from 1999 to 2014 at University College London Hospital for neoplasia associated with BE, whose outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Prior to any ablative therapy any visible nodularity was removed with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). After successful PDT and/or HALO RFA treatment, defined as a complete reversal of dysplasia and metaplasia, patients underwent endoscopic follow up using the Seattle protocol. RESULTS: A total of 288 patients were treated, 91 with PDT between 1999 and 2010, 173 with RFA between 2007 and 2014, and 24 with both PDT and RFA for neoplasia associated with BE. Subsquamous neoplasia occurred in seven patients (7/288, 2%). The first patient developed subsquamous invasive adenocarcinoma and underwent curative surgery. Another five patients with subsquamous neoplasia (either high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer) were treated successfully with EMR. The final patient developed subsquamous invasive esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma with liver metastases. CONCLUSION: Development of subsquamous neoplasia after an apparently successful PDT and/or RFA is a rare but recognized complication. Clinicians should be aware of this phenomenon and have a low threshold for performing an EMR. Thorough surveillance following successful PDT and/or RFA ensuring high-quality endoscopy is required.