ABSTRACT
Twenty-two hours after ip administration to male Wistar rats and BALB/c mice, 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane (1,1,1,2-TTCE) is bound covalently to DNA, RNA, and proteins of liver, lung, kidney, and stomach. The in vivo reactivity leads to binding values to DNA generally higher in mouse organs than in rat organs. The covalent binding index (CBI) values (82 in mouse liver DNA and 40 in rat liver DNA) classify 1,1,1,2-TTCE as a weak to moderate initiator. Both microsomal and cytosolic enzymatic systems from rat and mouse organs are capable of bioactivating 1,1,1,2-TTCE in vitro. Liver fractions are the most effective. When the activating systems are simultaneously present in the incubation mixture a synergistic effect is observed. Unlike the related chemical 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane (1,1,2,2-TTCE), which is bioactivated only through an oxidative route, 1,1,1,2-TTCE metabolism is carried on by oxidative and reductive pathways, both dependent on cytochrome P-450. 1,1,1,2-TTCE is also bioactivated by microsomal GSH-transferases from liver and lung. These data further confirm that correlations exist between structure and genotoxic activity of halocompounds.
Subject(s)
DNA/metabolism , Ethane/analogs & derivatives , Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated/metabolism , Mutagens , RNA/metabolism , Animals , Biotransformation , Ethane/metabolism , Ethane/toxicity , Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated/toxicity , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Rats , Rats, Inbred Strains , Structure-Activity RelationshipABSTRACT
This article presents results of the first Italian quality control program for determining the estradiol receptor on lypophilized guinea pig and calf uteri. Despite considerable variability in quantitative terms, the results concur in ability to define samples as positive or negative for receptor content. One of the parameters that most strongly influences accuracy of determination of receptor concentration is protein assay. The evaluation of several lyophilized preparations at scalar concentrations permitted identification, by linear regression, for each laboratory of the systematic and non-systematic variables. More comparable results will be forthcoming when a standardized methodology program has been fully adopted.
