Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Biomed Phys Eng Express ; 10(4)2024 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718784

ABSTRACT

A study of burn thresholds from superficially penetrating radio-frequency (RF) energy at 8.2 and 95 GHz for swine skin was conducted. The study determined the thresholds for superficial, partial-thickness, and full-thickness burn severities after 5 seconds of exposure at power densities of 4-30 W/cm2and 2-15 W/cm2at 8.2 and 95 GHz, respectively. There were significant differences in he burn thresholds at the different severities between the two frequencies due to the large difference in energy penetration depths. Biopsies were collected from each burn site at 1, 24, 72, and 168 hr post exposure. Each sample was assessed by a burn pathologist against 20 histological factors to characterize the damage resulting from these RF overexposures. A one-dimensional, layered digital phantom that utilized realistic values for dielectric and thermal properties was used to explain some observed thresholds. The results of the heating and cooling response of the animal model and histology scores of each exposure are provided to enhance future efforts at simulation of RF overexposures and to establish damage thresholds.


Subject(s)
Burns , Microwaves , Skin , Animals , Microwaves/adverse effects , Swine , Skin/radiation effects , Skin/pathology , Burns/etiology , Burns/pathology , Phantoms, Imaging , Radio Waves/adverse effects , Hot Temperature
2.
Tech Coloproctol ; 25(11): 1183-1198, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34562160

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Resection of low rectal adenocarcinoma can be challenging in the narrow pelvis of male patients. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) appears to offer technical advantages for distal rectal tumours, and robotic-assisted transabdominal TME (rTME) was introduced in effort to improve operative precision and ergonomics. However, no study has comprehensively compared these approaches. The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to compare postoperative short-term outcomes in rTME and TaTME. METHODS: A systematic online search (1974-July 2020) of MEDLINE, Embase, web of science and google scholar was conducted for trials, prospective or retrospective studies involving rTME, or TaTME for rectal cancer. Outcome variables included: hospital stay; operation duration, blood loss; resection margins; proportion of histologically complete resected specimens; lymph nodes; overall complications; anastomotic leak, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Sixty-two articles met the inclusion criteria, including 37 studies (3835 patients) assessing rTME resection, 23 studies (1326 patients) involving TaTME and 2 comparing both (165 patients). Operating time was longer in rTME (309.2 min, 95% CI 285.5-332.8) than in TaTME studies (256.2 min, 95% CI 231.5-280.9) (p = 0.002). rTME resected specimens had a larger distal resection margin (2.62 cm, 95% CI 2.35-2.88) than in TaTME studies (2.10 cm, 95% CI 1.83-2.36) (p = 0.007). Other outcome variables did not significantly differ between the two techniques. CONCLUSIONS: rTME provides similar pathological and short-term outcomes to TaTME and both are reasonable surgical approaches for patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer. To definitively answer the question of the optimal TME technique, we suggest a prospective trial comparing both techniques assessing long-term survival as a primary outcome.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Laparoscopy , Rectal Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Transanal Endoscopic Surgery , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectum/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Hernia ; 22(2): 215-226, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29305783

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This systematic review assesses the perioperative variables and post-operative outcomes reported by randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of VH repair. This review focuses particularly on definitions of hernia recurrence and techniques used for detection. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to identify and quantify the inconsistencies in perioperative variable and postoperative outcome reporting, so as to justify future development of clear definitions of hernia recurrence and a standardised dataset of such variables. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for elective VH repair RCTs reported January 1995 to March 2016 inclusive. Three independent reviewers performed article screening, and two reviewers independently extracted data. Hernia recurrence, recurrence rate, timing and definitions of recurrence, and techniques used to detect recurrence were extracted. We also assessed reported post-operative complications, standardised operative outcomes, patient reported outcomes, pre-operative CT scan hernia dimensions, intra-operative variables, patient co-morbidity, and hernia morphology. RESULTS: 31 RCTs (3367 patients) were identified. Only 6 (19.3%) defined hernia recurrence and methods to detect recurrence were inconsistent. Sixty-four different clinical outcomes were reported across the RCTs, with wound infection (30 trials, 96.7%), hernia recurrence (30, 96.7%), seroma (29, 93.5%), length of hospital stay (22, 71%) and haematoma (21, 67.7%) reported most frequently. Fourteen (45%), 11 (35%) and 0 trials reported CT measurements of hernia defect area, width and loss of domain, respectively. No trial graded hernias using generally accepted scales. CONCLUSION: VH RCTs report peri- and post-operative variables inconsistently, and with poor definitions. A standardised minimum dataset, including definitions of recurrence, is required.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Ventral/surgery , Herniorrhaphy , Postoperative Complications , Elective Surgical Procedures , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Herniorrhaphy/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Complications/classification , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recurrence
4.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 95(1): e20-1, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23317719

ABSTRACT

Chloramphenicol is a topical treatment that is used widely, especially in wounds around the eyes. In our practice there have been a number of cases of delayed hypersensitivity to chloramphenicol that has been mismanaged initially as an infective cellulitis. We hope to share some of our experience of this uncommon reaction to highlight the delayed reaction that can occur with topical application of this drug.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Chloramphenicol/adverse effects , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/diagnosis , Administration, Cutaneous , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/surgery , Chloramphenicol/administration & dosage , Diagnosis, Differential , Drug Eruptions/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Ointments , Postoperative Complications/chemically induced , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Skin Neoplasms/surgery
5.
Tech Coloproctol ; 16(5): 369-72, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22821277

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severe life-threatening complications have been reported from the use of procedure for prolapsed haemorrhoids (PPH). First, we assessed post-operative complication rates over 4 years of PPH experience. We then sought to assess the impact of selection criteria for patients receiving PPH on post-operative complication rates and review our findings in the context of published literature. METHODS: Over a 4-year period 2006-2010 at Hinchingbrooke Hospital, all 118 patients receiving PPH were audited for readmissions with post-operative complications using the admission database. A further retrospective audit of 50 patients' notes assessed the impact of selection criteria for PPH on post-operative complication rates. All PPH operations were performed by one of two senior colorectal consultants using the standard technique with a circular stapler. RESULTS: Of the 118 patients from the 4-year audit, 12 (10 %) patients were readmitted. Two (1.7 %) of these 12 patients had post-operative pain, six (5.1 %) had rectal bleeding, three (2.5 %) had urinary retention, and one (0.8 %) had localised infection. There was one (0.8 %) patient mortality resulting from severe sepsis from an infected intra-abdominal haemorrhagic collection. In the following audit of 50 patients' notes, 15 patients had internal prolapsed haemorrhoids alone, of which one (6.6 %) experienced post-operative complications compared with six (55 %) of the 11 patients who had haemorrhoids and skin tags. CONCLUSIONS: With careful selection of patients, PPH may be indicated for prolapsed internal haemorrhoids. More specific national guidelines are required with regard to contraindications to PPH.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhoidectomy/adverse effects , Hemorrhoids/surgery , Patient Selection , Female , Hemorrhoids/complications , Hemorrhoids/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Patient Readmission , Prolapse , Retrospective Studies , Skin Diseases/complications , Surgical Stapling/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Urinary Retention/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...