Second line treatment of recurrent glioblastoma with sunitinib: results of a phase II study and systematic review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: Second line treatment of recurrent or progressive glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is not standardized. Anti-angiogenic strategies with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors have been tested with conflicting results. We tested the association of sunitinib plus irinotecan (CPT-11) in a phase II trial in terms of response rate (RR) and 6-months progression-free survival (6-PFS). We also reviewed the clinical evidence from all the trials with sunitinib in this setting published to date and summarized it in a meta-analysis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Patients with GBM recurrent or progressive after surgery and standard chemo-radiotherapy were treated with sunitinib 37.5 mg/day for 14 days + CPT-11 125 mg/sqm every 14 days in a Simon's two-stage phase II study. A summary data meta-analysis was performed to establish the 6-PFS in patients with ascertained histological diagnosis of GBM treated with sunitinib. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Six patients were enrolled in the stage I of the trial and only one had a stable disease. The overall response rate was 17% and 6-PFS was not reached. Therefore, the trial was stopped early for insufficient activity. All toxicities were grade 1-2. Systematic review of the literature identified 9 studies (including the present one) for a total of 221 patients. Pooled 6-PFS was 15.1% (95% CI: 9.0-24.4). Subgroup analysis by different schedule revealed a 6-PFS of 17.5% (95% CI: 10.3-28.1) in the weekly setting which was consistent across all the studies (I2=0%, P=0.66) and a pooled 6-PFS of 12.7% (95% CI: 4.9-29.1) in the daily setting with a substantial amount of heterogeneity (I2=65%, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Results of this trial and those of the systematic review indicate that, compared to conventional chemotherapy or bevacizumab, sunitinib has insufficient activity in the setting of recurrent GBM. Better patient's molecular stratification for second-line treatment in GBM is warranted.

Practical prognostic score for predicting the extent of resection and neurological outcome of gliomas in the sensorimotor area.

OBJECTIVE: In this prospective study, we assessed the utility of a novel prognostic score (PS) in guiding the surgical strategy of patients with sensorimotor area gliomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Form December 2012 to April 2016, we collected data from patients diagnosed with brain gliomas in the sensorimotor area. All the patients had intraoperatively confirmed contiguity or continuity with sensorimotor cortical and subcortical structures. Several clinical and radiological factors were analyzed to generate a PS for each patient (range 1-8). The end-points included the extent of resection (EOR) and neurological outcome (modified Rankin Score; mRS). We assessed the predictive power of the PS using different analyses. Crosstabs analyses and Fisher's exact test (Fet) were used to evaluate the possible predictive parameters, and for the classification of positive or negative outcomes for the chosen proxies; the significance threshold was set at p<0.05. RESULTS: Using independent t-tests, we compared the mRS at different time points (pre, post, and at 6 months) for 2 subgroups from the total sample using a cut-off PS value of 4. For the EOR, a PS value of ≥5 was predictive of successful outcome, a value of 4 indicated an uncertain outcome, and a value of ≤3 predicted a worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This PS value can be easily used in clinical settings to help predict the functional outcome and EOR in sensorimotor area tumors. Integration with information from fMRI, DTI, and TMS, along with MRI spectroscopy could further enhance the value of this PS.

A neuro-oncologic challenge: the case of a large, aggressive, malignant meningioma of the skull base with paranasal sinus involvement.

BACKGROUND: Malignant meningiomas, rare tumors that account for approximately 1%-3% of all meningioma, have high recurrence, morbidity, and mortality rate and a particularly poor outcome. Surgical excision followed by adjuvant radiotherapy is the current approach for the treatment of these tumors. METHODS: In the case reported, the disease, characterized by a high proliferative index (Ki67 60%-70%), was treated with endoscopic surgery limited to the extracranial portion; then the patient underwent radiotherapy, on the residual tumor volume, to a total dose of 66 Gy delivered in 33 fractions (2 Gy/fraction) by helical intensity-modulated radiation therapy with image-guided radiotherapy daily checks (tomotherapy). RESULTS: Two and a half years after the treatment, the patient is alive and a partial response is maintained. The patient is healthy overall with grade I fatigue and grade II hearing loss as late toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.1). CONCLUSIONS: Within a multidisciplinary approach, new radiotherapy techniques confirm their effectiveness and reliability for the treatment of malignant meningioma.

The treatment of patients with 1-3 brain metastases: is there a place for whole brain radiotherapy alone, yet? A retrospective analysis.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with or without other treatments in patients (pts) with 1-3 brain metastases (BM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Toxicities and survival of 134 pts treated between 2009 and 2013 with WBRT alone (58 pts), WBRT plus surgery (SUR-WBRT: 42 pts) or WBRT followed by stereotactic or integrated boost radiotherapy (SRT-WBRT: 34 pts) were analyzed. Differences in toxicity (acute and late) incidence and in overall (OS), disease-free (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were evaluated (χ(2)-test, uni- and multivariate analysis). RESULTS: Pts given intensified treatments (SUR- and SBRT-WBRT) had better 3-month local response compared to WBRT alone group (p < 0.045). Better 1-year local control was evident only in SRT-WBRT pts (p < 0.035). Univariate OS analysis confirmed, as favorable prognostic factors, RPA class I (p < 0.001), GPA class III and IV (p < 0.001), single metastasis (p = 0.045), stable primary disease (p = 0.03), intensified treatment (p = 0.000), systemic therapy after radiotherapy (p = 0.04) and response of metastatic lesions (p = 0.002). At multivariate analysis, OS was better in RPA class I pts (p = 0.002), who had more aggressive radiotherapy treatments (p = 0.001), chemotherapy after radiotherapy (p < 0.001) and response to RT (p = 0.003). Response to radiotherapy (p = 0.002) and BM number (p < 0.001) resulted independently prognostic for DFS. About 60 % of patients had mild acute toxicity (G1), especially headache (51 %) and fatigue (34 %); only 2 patients (2 %) had severe (G3) headache and 5 patients (4 %) severe fatigue (G3) reversible with oral steroids. No differences were evident between the different treatment groups. Among 80 pts followed up with MRI, 12 (15 %) had leukoencephalopathy (equally distributed across subgroups) and 5 (6 %) radionecroses, 4/5 asymptomatic, 5/5 in pts given intensified treatments. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirms the known prognostic factors for BM, emphasizing the importance of intensified treatments in a population with favorable features.

EGFR amplified and overexpressing glioblastomas and association with better response to adjuvant metronomic temozolomide.

BACKGROUND: Lack of robust predictive biomarkers, other than MGMT promoter methylation, makes temozolomide responsiveness in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients difficult to predict. However, we identified patients with long-term survival (≥35 months) within a group of newly diagnosed GBM patients treated with standard or metronomic adjuvant temozolomide schedules. We thus investigated possible molecular profiles associated with longer survival following temozolomide treatment. METHODS: We investigated the association of molecular features with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Human-derived GBM cancer stem cells (CSCs) were used to investigate in vitro molecular mechanisms associated with temozolomide responsiveness. Surgically removed recurrences allowed investigation of molecular changes occurring during therapy in vivo. Statistical analyses included one- and two-way analysis of variance, Student's t test, Cox proportional hazards, and the Kaplan-Meier method. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: No association was found between survival and gene classifiers associated with different molecular GBM subtypes in the standard-treated group, while in metronomic-treated patients robust association was found between EGFR amplification/overexpression and PFS and OS (OS, EGFR-high vs low: hazard ratiodeath = 0.22, 95% confidence interval = 0.09 to 0.55, P = .001). The result for OS remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (P interaction < .0005). Long-term survival following metronomic temozolomide was independent from MGMT and EGFRvIII status and was more pronounced in EGFR-overexpressing GBM patients with PTEN loss. In vitro findings confirmed a selective dose- and time-dependent decrease in survival of temozolomide-treated EGFR+ human-derived glioblastoma CSCs, which occurred through inhibition of NF-κB transcriptional activity. In addition, reduction in EGFR-amplified cells, along with a statistically significant decrease in NF-κB/p65 expression, were observed in specimens from recurrent metronomic-treated EGFR-overexpressing GBM patients. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR-amplified/overexpressing glioblastomas strongly benefit from metronomic temozolomide-based therapies.

Retreatment of recurrent adult medulloblastoma with radiotherapy: a case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Medulloblastoma, the most frequent brain tumor in childhood, also occurs with a wide range of characteristics in adult patients. Late relapse is common in adult medulloblastoma, and the overall survival of relapsed patients usually ranges from 12 to 15 months. Treatment at recurrence is still debated and after reoperation includes stereotactic or normofractionated radiotherapy, and high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation. CASE PRESENTATION: We report on the case of a 31-year-old Caucasian woman who underwent re-irradiation for a recurrence of medulloblastoma at nine years after first irradiation (56Gy), focusing on the radiobiological background and a review of previous studies involving re-irradiation of recurrent medulloblastoma. After surgical excision of the relapsed tumor and medical multi-agent treatment, the site of recurrence was treated using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to a total dose of 52.8Gy (1.2Gy/fraction/twice daily). A total biological equivalent dose of 224.6Gy (α:ß = 2 Gy) was delivered to the posterior fossa (first and second treatments). No radionecrosis or local recurrence was evident at 18 months after re-irradiation. CONCLUSION: Re-irradiation can be considered a possible and safe treatment in selected cases of recurrent medulloblastoma in adults. The reported radiobiological considerations could be useful in other cases involving re-irradiation of brain tumors.

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in patients with glioma: a clinical prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in the management of epilepsy in patients with glioma. DESIGN: A prospective study in hospitalized patients with a new diagnosis of glioma. SETTING: Department of Neurological Sciences and Visions, Spedali Civili of Brescia. PATIENTS: From March 1, 2006, until January 1, 2009, 176 consecutive patients (101 men and 75 women) with a first diagnosis of glioma were enrolled in the study. All patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy were treated with levetiracetam. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical, histological, and magnetic resonance imaging findings were analyzed. RESULTS: Age at the diagnosis of glioma ranged from 22 to 79 years (mean [SD], 57 [15] years; median, 59 years). Duration of the disease ranged from 27 days to 2(1/2) years (mean [SD], 13.7 [7.8] months; median, 13 months). Eighty-two patients received levetiracetam because of a diagnosis of epilepsy. At the last evaluation (May 1, 2009), 75 of 82 patients (91%) treated with levetiracetam were seizure free; in 2 of these patients, levetiracetam was withdrawn because of intolerable adverse effects. Prompt and long-lasting control of seizures was obtained in 49 of 82 patients (60%) with a dose of levetiracetam that ranged from 1500 to 3000 mg/d, and 9 (11%) of the treated patients needed an increase of levetiracetam dosage to 4000 mg/d to become seizure free. No laboratory abnormalities were observed in patients with concomitant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide good evidence that levetiracetam is efficacious and safe in patients with epilepsy due to glioma.

Quantification of chloride channel 2 (CLCN2) gene isoforms in normal versus lesion- and epilepsy-associated brain tissue.

The chloride channel 2 (CLCN2) gene codes for a protein organized in N- and C-terminal regions with regulatory functions and a transmembrane region which forms the ring of the pore. Mutations in the gene have previously been described in patients with idiopathic familial epilepsy. In this study we looked for new isoforms of CLCN2 and we estimated expression levels by real time PCR in brain tissue containing epileptic foci. Samples used in this study were first analyzed and selected to exclude mutations in the coding region of the gene. Four isoforms (skipping exons 3, 16, 22 and 6/7) were identified and quantified by Real Time PCR and compared with total expression of the gene. Expression of the region common to all CLCN2 isoforms was 50% less in epilepsy-associated brain tissue than in controls. The ratio of the various isoforms was slightly greater in epileptic than control tissue. The greatest difference was recorded in the temporal lobe for the isoform with skipped exon 22. Analysis of these isoforms in brain tissue containing epileptic foci suggests that CLCN2 could be implicated in epilepsy, even in the absence of mutations.