SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Employees of Four Essential Non-Health Care Sectors at Moderate/High Risk of Exposure to Coronavirus Infection: Data From the "First Wave".

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence in Swiss non-health care employees at a moderate to high risk of exposure: bus drivers and supermarket, laundry service, and mail-sorting center employees. METHODS: Data on 455 essential workers included demographics, SARS-CoV-2 exposure and use of protective measures. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins G and A targeting the spike protein were measured between May and July 2020. RESULTS: The overall crude seroprevalence estimate (15.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12.6% to 19.7%) among essential workers was not significantly higher than that of the general working-age population (11.2%; 95% CI, 7.1% to 15.2%). Seroprevalence ranged from 11.9% (95% CI, 6.3% to 19.8%) among bus drivers to 22.0% (95% CI, 12.6% to 19.7%) among food supermarket employees. CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant difference in seroprevalence between our sample of essential workers and local working-age population during the first lockdown phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Having a seropositive housemate was the strongest predictor of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity.

Adherence to Coronavirus Disease 2019 Preventive Measures in a Representative Sample of the Population of the Canton of Vaud, Switzerland.

Objectives: We quantified adherence to COVID-19 preventive measures and explored associated factors, after the first and during the second Swiss epidemic waves. Methods: With an observational cohort study in a representative sample of individuals aged 15 years and more, we analysed the association between self-reported adherence to COVID-19 preventive measures (respect of simple hygiene rules; respect of social distancing rules; wearing a mask) and socio-demographic factors, the existence of a chronic disease, and the existence of a previous confirmed COVID-19 episode. Results: Highest adherence was to simple hygiene rules, followed by social distancing rules and mask wearing, with a slight decrease for simple hygiene rules and a strong increase for mask wearing between visits. Men were significantly less likely to respect simple hygiene rules and wear a mask in public. Participants aged 65 years and more (versus 25-64 years) and those with at least one chronic disease (versus none) were two times more likely to respect social distancing rules and wear a mask. Conclusion: Adherence to social distancing rules and mask wearing was rather poor, especially compared to other countries.

210Po and 210Pb content in the smoke of Heated Tobacco Products versus Conventional Cigarette smoking.

210Po is a radioactive component of conventional cigarette tobacco smoke and is a recognized carcinogen. Despite the expanding market of heated tobacco products, no data are available on the activity of 210Po in the smoke of IQOS Heets cigarette. We determined the 210Po activity in the mainstream smoke of thirteen cigarette brands available on the Swiss market using a smoking machine and compared the results to the 210Po activity measured in the mainstream smoke of the IQOS system. In addition, we measured the 210Po and 210Pb loss on heating after uniform heating from 50 to 600 °C for several cigarette brands and the Heets cigarettes. 13.6 ± 4.1% of 210Po activity was found in the mainstream smoke in conventional cigarette smoking (7% for 210Pb). This dropped to 1.8 ± 0.3% in the mainstream smoke of IQOS Heets. Conversely, when the tobacco was heated uniformly at 330 °C, a loss of 210Po of more than 80% was observed for all type of cigarettes. Apparently, IQOS significantly reduced the 210Po and 210Pb activities in the mainstream smoke. However, our results show that only 15% of the Heets tobacco reaches 330 °C with IQOS. While IQOS reduces the 210Po and 210Pb activities in the mainstream smoke compared to conventional cigarettes, it only heats a marginal fraction of the tobacco present in the Heets cigarette. Because smoking is an addiction (mostly due to nicotine), IQOS could possibly deliver an unsatisfactory dose of nicotine to a Heets cigarette smoker, as most of the tobacco is left unaltered.

[Cascade genetic testing of familial hypercholesterolemia A new opportunity for prevention]. / Dépistage génétique en cascade de l'hypercholestérolémie familiale - Une nouvelle opportunité pour la prévention cardiovasculaire.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder associated with an increased risk of early-onset cardiovascular events. Because lifestyle interventions and lipid-lowering drugs can strongly reduce cardiovascular risk, the early diagnosis of FH is important. Indeed, given the autosomal dominant transmission of the pathogenic variant, a genetic cascade screening program of first-degree relatives from an index case could identify patients at high cardiovascular risk. In Switzerland, genetic testing for FH is rarely used, because it is not reimbursed by health insurance companies. To test the usefulness of cascade genetic testing for FH, the CATCH study is currently ongoing in all linguistic part of Switzerland.

L'hypercholestérolémie familiale (HF) est une maladie génétique associée à un risque augmenté d'événements cardiovasculaires précoces. Étant donné que les adaptations du style de vie et les traitements hypolipémiants peuvent réduire fortement le risque cardiovasculaire, le diagnostic précoce de l'HF est important. À cette fin, en raison de la transmission autosomique dominante du variant pathogène, un dépistage génétique en cascade des apparentés du premier degré organisé autour du cas index permettrait d'identifier précocement les patients à risque cardiovasculaire élevé. Cependant, le test génétique est très peu utilisé en Suisse, car il n'est pas remboursé par les caisses-maladie. Afin de tester l'utilité du dépistage génétique en cascade de l'HF, l'étude CATCH est en cours actuellement dans les trois régions linguistiques de Suisse.

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Household Members and Other Close Contacts of COVID-19 Cases: A Serologic Study in Canton of Vaud, Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: Research on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission within households and other close settings using serological testing is scarce. METHODS: We invited coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases diagnosed between February 27 and April 1, 2020, in Canton of Vaud, Switzerland, to participate, along with household members and other close contacts. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G antibodies were measured using a Luminex immunoassay. We estimated factors associated with serological status using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Overall, 219 cases, 302 household members, and 69 other close contacts participated between May 4 and June 27, 2020. More than half of household members (57.2%; 95% CI, 49.7%-64.3%) had developed a serologic response to SARS-CoV-2, while 19.0% (95% CI, 10.0%-33.2%) of other close contacts were seropositive. After adjusting for individual and household characteristics, infection risk was higher in household members aged ≥65 years than in younger adults (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.63; 95% CI, 1.05-12.60) and in those not strictly adhering to simple hygiene rules like hand washing (aOR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.02-3.17). The risk was lower when more than 5 people outside home were met during semiconfinement, compared with none (aOR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.16-0.74). Individual risk of household members to be seropositive was lower in large households (22% less per each additional person). CONCLUSIONS: During semiconfinement, household members of a COVID-19 case were at very high risk of getting infected, 3 times more than close contacts outside home. This highlights the need to provide clear messages on protective measures applicable at home. For elderly couples, who were especially at risk, providing external support for daily basic activities is essential.

Corona Immunitas: study protocol of a nationwide program of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and seroepidemiologic studies in Switzerland.

OBJECTIVES: Seroprevalence studies to assess the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the general population and subgroups are key for evaluating mitigation and vaccination policies and for understanding the spread of the disease both on the national level and for comparison with the international community. METHODS: Corona Immunitas is a research program of coordinated, population-based, seroprevalence studies implemented by Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+). Over 28,340 participants, randomly selected and age-stratified, with some regional specificities will be included. Additional studies in vulnerable and highly exposed subpopulations are also planned. The studies will assess population immunological status during the pandemic. RESULTS: Phase one (first wave of pandemic) estimates from Geneva showed a steady increase in seroprevalence up to 10.8% (95% CI 8.2-13.9, n = 775) by May 9, 2020. Since June, Zurich, Lausanne, Basel City/Land, Ticino, and Fribourg recruited a total of 5973 participants for phase two thus far. CONCLUSIONS: Corona Immunitas will generate reliable, comparable, and high-quality serological and epidemiological data with extensive coverage of Switzerland and of several subpopulations, informing health policies and decision making in both economic and societal sectors. ISRCTN Registry: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN18181860 .

[New European and American guidelines on the management of blood cholesterol†: similarities and differences]. / Nouvelles recommandations européennes et américaines pour les dyslipidémies†: similitudes et différences.

Experts' guidelines for the management of dyslipidemias differ from country to country, with important differences between medical societies of Europe and the United States. Recently, new American and European guidelines have been established. These guidelines mainly differ for cardiovascular risk stratification in secondary prevention, and for LDL-cholesterol (LDL-c) goals to achieve. Similitudes between guidelines include the global strategy to initiate lipid-lowering drugs, which is based first on the global cardiovascular risk, then on the LDL-c level. We are here presenting a comparison and an interpretation of these guidelines.

Les recommandations d'experts pour la prise en charge des dyslipidémies varient d'un pays à l'autre, avec des différences importantes entre les sociétés médicales d'Europe et des États-Unis. Récemment, de nouvelles recommandations américaines et européennes ont été établies. Elles diffèrent principalement dans la stratification du risque cardiovasculaire en prévention secondaire, ainsi que dans les cibles de LDL-cholestérol (LDL-c) à atteindre. Le point commun reste que l'indication au traitement hypolipémiant se base en premier sur le risque cardiovasculaire global, puis sur le taux de LDL-c. Nous présentons une comparaison et une interprétation de ces recommandations.

Control of cardiovascular risk factors and health behaviors in patients post acute coronary syndromes eligible for protein convertase subtilisin/kexin-9 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine cardiovascular risk factors and health behaviors in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) according to potential extension of eligibility criteria for protein convertase subtilisin/kexin-9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) to all patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) equal or above 1.8 mmol/l. METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study, patients with ACS between 2009 and 2016 and with available LDL-c at one year were considered. We defined three mutually exclusive groups of patients according to eligibility for PCSK9i: "not eligible", "currently eligible", and "newly eligible". We explored the control of cardiovascular risk factors and health behaviors. RESULTS: Out of 3025 patients who had an ACS one year ago, 1071 (35.4%) were not eligible for PCSK9i, 415 (13.7%) were currently eligible, and 1539 (50.9%) were newly eligible. The proportion of patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the not eligible group was lower than in the group currently eligible (27.6% vs 33.6%, p = 0.02), but similar to the group newly eligible (27.6% vs 28.2%, p = 0.73). The proportion of smokers in the not eligible group was lower than in the group currently eligible (21.2% vs 28.0%, p = 0.02), but similar to the group newly eligible (21.2% vs 22.5%, p = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: More than half of patients with ACS would be additionally eligible for PCSK9i if prescription is extended from current guidelines to all patients with LDL-c equal or above 1.8 mmol/l. Patients currently eligible for PCSK9i one year after an ACS had a worst control of cardiovascular risk factors than patients potentially newly eligible.