Predictors of Perioperative Vancouver B Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Associated With the Direct Anterior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is an association between intraoperative and postoperative femoral fractures and the direct anterior approach (DAA) to total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of our study is to identify risk factors for Vancouver B fractures and to establish a predictable timeline for when these occur. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with Vancouver B periprosthetic femoral fractures (n = 49) after 11,509 elective primary cementless THA procedures through the DAA between 2012 and 2018 at a single institution. Fracture patients were matched to nonfracture patients (n = 267) by date of surgery and surgeon. Clinical and radiographic factors were collected for multivariable analysis to identify predictors of fracture. RESULTS: Periprosthetic Vancouver B femoral fracture incidence was 0.4%. 48 (98%) fractures were postoperative. Fractures occurred at an average of 44 days after surgery (range: 1 to 653 days) with >85% of fractures occurring in the first 6 weeks postoperatively. Significant variables predictive of fracture included >3 degrees valgus and >5 degrees varus coronal stem malalignment, Dorr B and C femoral geometry, lower canal flare index (2.75 vs 3.20), advanced age, increased comorbidities, greater stem canal fill, and right-sided procedures. CONCLUSION: Despite an overall low rate of Vancouver B perioperative periprosthetic femoral fractures, it is a devastating complication that typically presents within the first 6 weeks after DAA THA surgery. The risk is increased in patients with unfavorable proximal femoral geometry, coronal stem malalignment, advanced age, increased comorbidities, and right-sided procedures.

Impact of Resident Training Level on Radiation Exposure During Fixation of Proximal Femur Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: To identify whether residents are at greater risk of radiation exposure from intraoperative fluoroscopy while earlier in their training and during more complex procedures. METHODS: We analyzed 852 extracapsular proximal femur fracture fixation cases. We compared fluoroscopy times by various levels of resident training, fracture type, and implant used. Attending-only cases were used as a control group. RESULTS: Fluoroscopy times during subtrochanteric fracture fixation (176.1 ± 11.27 seconds) were longer than intertrochanteric (111.4 ± 2.44 seconds) and basicervical fractures (91.49 ± 5.77 seconds). Long nail (150.2 ± 3.75 seconds) times were longer than short (92.3 ± 3.15 seconds) and intermediate (76.45 ± 3.01 seconds) nails. Significantly, more fluoroscopy was used in junior (115.9 ± 4.24 seconds), senior (123.0 ± 6.08 seconds), junior combo (130.6 ± 7.74 seconds), and senior combo cases (131.8 ± 6.11 seconds) compared with the control (94.91 ± 3.91). CONCLUSION: Orthopaedic surgery residents and attendings must remain aware of radiation exposure secondary to intraoperative fluoroscopy. Appropriate personal protective equipment should be worn, and more experienced surgeons should take a more active role in the complex cases to decrease exposure risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants as Functional Prosthetic Spacers for Definitive Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the utility of a standard primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) femoral component with an all polyethylene tibia as a functional prosthetic spacer in place of a conventional all cement spacer for the management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of this multicenter study was to retrospectively review (1) ultimate treatment success; (2) reimplantation rates; (3) reoperation rates; and (4) change in knee range of motion in patients managed with functional prosthetic spacers following TKA PJI. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for patients at 2 tertiary care centers who underwent a functional prosthetic spacer implantation as part of a functional single-stage (n = 57) or all cement spacer conventional two-stage (n = 137) revision arthroplasty protocol over a 5-year period. Outcomes including reinfection, reimplantation, and reoperation rates, success rate as defined by the Delphi criteria, and final range of motion were compared between the 2 cohorts at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in reinfection (14.0 vs 24.1%), reoperation (19.3 vs 27.7%), or success rates (78.9 vs 70.8%; P > .05 for all) between the one-stage and two-stage revision TKA cohorts. Mean final total arc of motion was also similar between the 2 groups (105.8 vs 101.8 degrees, respectively). CONCLUSION: Functional prosthetic spacers offer the advantage of a single procedure with decreased overall hospitalization and improved cost-effectiveness with analogous success rates (78.9%) compared with two-stage exchange (70.8%) at mid-term follow-up. Although long-term data are required to determine its longevity and efficacy, the outcomes in this study are encouraging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.