Minimal residual disease assessment in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia by semi-automated identification of normal hematopoietic cells: A EuroFlow study.

Presence of minimal residual disease (MRD), detected by flow cytometry, is an important prognostic biomarker in the management of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). However, data-analysis remains mainly expert-dependent. In this study, we designed and validated an Automated Gating & Identification (AGI) tool for MRD analysis in BCP-ALL patients using the two tubes of the EuroFlow 8-color MRD panel. The accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of the AGI tool was validated in a multicenter study using bone marrow follow-up samples from 174 BCP-ALL patients, stained with the EuroFlow BCP-ALL MRD panel. In these patients, MRD was assessed both by manual analysis and by AGI tool supported analysis. Comparison of MRD levels obtained between both approaches showed a concordance rate of 83%, with comparable concordances between MRD tubes (tube 1, 2 or both), treatment received (chemotherapy versus targeted therapy) and flow cytometers (FACSCanto versus FACSLyric). After review of discordant cases by additional experts, the concordance increased to 97%. Furthermore, the AGI tool showed excellent intra-expert concordance (100%) and good inter-expert concordance (90%). In addition to MRD levels, also percentages of normal cell populations showed excellent concordance between manual and AGI tool analysis. We conclude that the AGI tool may facilitate MRD analysis using the EuroFlow BCP-ALL MRD protocol and will contribute to a more standardized and objective MRD assessment. However, appropriate training is required for the correct analysis of MRD data.

The Euroflow PID Orientation Tube in the diagnostic workup of primary immunodeficiency: Daily practice performance in a tertiary university hospital.

Introduction: Multiparameter flow cytometry (FCM) immunophenotyping is an important tool in the diagnostic screening and classification of primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs). The EuroFlow Consortium recently developed the PID Orientation Tube (PIDOT) as a universal screening tool to identify lymphoid-PID in suspicious patients. Although PIDOT can identify different lymphoid-PIDs with high sensitivity, clinical validation in a broad spectrum of patients with suspicion of PID is missing. In this study, we investigated the diagnostic performance of PIDOT, as part of the EuroFlow diagnostic screening algorithm for lymphoid-PID, in a daily practice at a tertiary reference center for PID. Methods: PIDOT was tested in 887 consecutive patients suspicious of PID at the Ghent University Hospital, Belgium. Patients were classified into distinct subgroups of lymphoid-PID vs. non-PID disease controls (non-PID DCs), according to the IUIS and ESID criteria. For the clinical validation of PIDOT, comprehensive characterization of the lymphoid defects was performed, together with the identification of the most discriminative cell subsets to distinguish lymphoid-PID from non-PID DCs. Next, a decision-tree algorithm was designed to guide subsequent FCM analyses. Results: The mean number of lymphoid defects detected by PIDOT in blood was 2.87 times higher in lymphoid-PID patients vs. non-PID DCs (p < 0.001), resulting in an overall sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 62% to detect severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID), combined immunodeficiency with associated or syndromic features (CID), immune dysregulation disorder (ID), and common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). The most discriminative populations were total memory and switched memory B cells, total T cells, TCD4+cells, and naive TCD4+cells, together with serum immunoglobulin levels. Based on these findings, a decision-tree algorithm was designed to guide further FCM analyses, which resulted in an overall sensitivity and specificity for all lymphoid-PIDs of 86% and 82%, respectively. Conclusion: Altogether, our findings confirm that PIDOT is a powerful tool for the diagnostic screening of lymphoid-PID, particularly to discriminate (S)CID, ID, and CVID patients from other patients suspicious of PID. The combination of PIDOT and serum immunoglobulin levels provides an efficient guide for further immunophenotypic FCM analyses, complementary to functional and genetic assays, for accurate PID diagnostics.

Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells in kidney transplant recipients: The next big thing?

Bone marrow-derived multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) are non-haematopoietic cells present in the bone marrow stroma. They have the potential to modulate immune responses and exhibit a capacity to promote immune tolerance. Although the efficacy of immunosuppressive drugs has improved significantly, thereby ameliorating renal graft outcome, the use of these drugs still carries an increased risk of malignancies and opportunistic infections, and sometimes fail to prevent chronic allograft rejection or recurrence of the original kidney disease. As such, there is strong interest in ways to induce immune tolerance and thereby tempering or avoiding conventional immunosuppressive drugs. Cellular immunomodulation by MSCs can create a new way to induce transplant tolerance. This review will give a critical overview of the use of BM-MSCs as a cell-based immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients. In vitro studies revealed several mechanisms that can clarify the immunomodulatory potential of BM-MSCs. Several clinical studies showed that BM-MSCs can modulate T-cell proliferation and can alter the ratio of T-cell subsets, favoring immune tolerance. However, this immunomodulation was often not associated with better clinical outcome during follow-up when compared to control groups. Some clinical studies found that BM-MSCs allow a reduction in dose of conventional immunosuppressive drugs and prevent acute graft dysfunction. Most clinical studies emphasized that BM-MSC infusion was safe. This review suggests that the use of BM-MSCs as cell-based immunosuppression therapy in kidney transplant recipients has potential, however some caution regarding their clinical use is appropriate. Mechanisms by which BM-MSCs induce transplant tolerance and factors that can alter their functionality need to be analyzed in more detail before clinical use.