Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 76(9): 2754-68, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20190085

ABSTRACT

Two samples of market oysters, primarily from retail establishments, were collected twice each month in each of nine states during 2007. Samples were shipped refrigerated overnight to five U.S. Food and Drug Administration laboratories on a rotating basis and analyzed by most probable number (MPN) for total and pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus numbers and for the presence of toxigenic V. cholerae, Salmonella spp., norovirus (NoV), and hepatitis A virus (HAV). Levels of indicator organisms, including fecal coliforms (MPN), Escherichia coli (MPN), male-specific bacteriophage, and aerobic plate counts, were also determined. V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus levels were distributed seasonally and geographically by harvest region and were similar to levels observed in a previous study conducted in 1998-1999. Levels of pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus were typically several logs lower than total V. parahaemolyticus levels regardless of season or region. Pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus levels in the Gulf and Mid-Atlantic regions were about two logs greater than the levels observed in the Pacific and North Atlantic regions. Pathogens generally associated with fecal pollution were detected sporadically or not at all (toxigenic V. cholerae, 0%; Salmonella, 1.5%; NoV, 3.9%; HAV, 4.4%). While seasonal prevalences of NoV and HAV were generally greater in oysters harvested from December to March, the low detection frequency obscured any apparent seasonal effects. Overall, there was no relationship between the levels of indicator microorganisms and the presence of enteric viruses. These data provide a baseline that can be used to further validate risk assessment predictions, determine the effectiveness of new control measures, and compare the level of protection provided by the U.S. shellfish sanitation system to those in other countries.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Ostreidae/microbiology , Shellfish/microbiology , Viruses/isolation & purification , Animals , Caliciviridae Infections/epidemiology , Caliciviridae Infections/virology , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Mid-Atlantic Region , Norovirus/isolation & purification , Ostreidae/virology , Seasons , United States/epidemiology , Vibrio parahaemolyticus/isolation & purification , Vibrio vulnificus/isolation & purification
2.
J Food Prot ; 72(10): 2110-3, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19833034

ABSTRACT

From June through October 2004, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration collected oysters (61 samples) that had been subjected to postharvest processing (PHP) methods, including mild heat treatment, freezing, and high hydrostatic pressure, from processors and retail markets in various states to determine Vibrio vulnificus and V. parahaemolyticus levels. Presence in a 25-g sample and most probable number (MPN) using standard enrichment and selective isolation procedures were utilized. Suspect colonies were isolated and identified using DNA probe colony hybridization. Neither species of vibrio was detected in 25-g portions of most samples regardless of the PHP. The lowest frequency of isolation of either pathogen (<10%) was observed with the mild heat process. Few (12 to 13%) frozen samples collected at the processor but not at retail contained >30 MPN/g of either pathogen. The mean levels of either organism in PHP oysters observed in the present study were 5 to 6 log less than in unprocessed raw Gulf Coast oysters. Of the 70 V. vulnificus isolates examined, only 5 possessed the putative virulence marker, type B 16S rRNA. Neither the thermostable direct hemolysin (tdh) nor the tdh-related hemolysin (trh) virulence gene was detected in any of the 40 V. parahaemolyticus isolates examined in the present study. These data suggest that if there is any selective advantage to pathogenic strains of V. vulnificus and V. parahaemolyticus, these differences are minimal. These results indicate that all PHP treatments greatly reduce exposure of V. vulnificus and V. parahaemolyticus to raw-oyster consumers. Consequently, these PHP oysters pose a much lower risk of illness to consumers due to these pathogens.


Subject(s)
Food Contamination/analysis , Food Handling/methods , Ostreidae/microbiology , Shellfish/microbiology , Vibrio parahaemolyticus/isolation & purification , Vibrio vulnificus/isolation & purification , Animals , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Colony Count, Microbial , Consumer Product Safety , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Food Microbiology , Humans , Prevalence , Risk Assessment , Seasons , Shellfish Poisoning/epidemiology , Shellfish Poisoning/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology , Vibrio parahaemolyticus/genetics , Vibrio vulnificus/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...