Morphomics-informed population pharmacokinetic and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling to optimize cefazolin surgical prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: Cefazolin is the leading antibiotic used to prevent surgical site infections worldwide. Consensus guidelines recommend adjustment of the cefazolin dose above and below 120 kg without regard to body composition. Algorithms exist to repurpose radiologic data into body composition (morphomics) and inform dosing decisions in obesity. OBJECTIVES: To compare the current standard of body weight to morphomic measurements as covariates of cefazolin pharmacokinetics and aid dose stratification of cefazolin in patients with obesity undergoing colorectal surgery. METHODS: This prospective study measured cefazolin plasma, fat, and colon tissue concentrations in colorectal surgery patients in order to develop a morphomics-informed population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model to guide dose adjustments. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was also constructed to inform tissue partitioning in morbidly obese patients (n = 21, body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 with one or more co-morbid conditions). RESULTS: Morphomics and pharmacokinetic data were available in 58 patients with a median [min, max] weight and age of 95.9 [68.5, 148.8] kg and 55 [25, 79] years, respectively. The plasma-to-subcutaneous fat partition coefficient was predicted to be 0.072 and 0.060 by the PopPK and PBPK models, respectively. The estimated creatinine clearance (eCLcr ) and body depth at the third lumbar vertebra (body depth_L3) were identified as covariates of cefazolin exposure. The probability of maintaining subcutaneous fat concentrations above 2 µg/mL for 100% of a 4-h surgical period was below 90% when eCLcr ≥105 mL/min and body depth_L3 ≥ 300 mm and less sensitive to the rate of infusion between 5 and 60 min. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney function and morphomics were more informative than body weight as covariates of cefazolin target site exposure. Data from more diverse populations, consensus on target cefazolin exposure, and comparative studies are needed before a change in practice can be implemented.

"Learn from each other": A qualitative exploration of collaborative quality improvement.

BACKGROUND: Collaborative quality improvement is an established method to conduct quality improvement in surgical care. Despite the success of this method, little is known about the experiences, perceptions, and attitudes of those who participate in collaborative quality improvement. The following study elicited common themes associated with the experiences and perceptions of surgeons participating in collaborative quality improvement. METHODS: We conducted an interpretive description qualitative study of surgeons participating in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, which is a statewide collaborative quality improvement consortium in Michigan. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using an interview guide. RESULTS: A sample of 24 participants completed interviews with a mean (SD) age of 48.7 (11.5) years and 16 (80%) male participants. Two major themes were identified. First, the contextualization of individual performance was seen as key to identifying opportunities for improvement and creating motivation to improve. Contextualization of individual performance relative to peer performance was collaborative rather than punitive. Second, peer learning emerged as the primary way to inform practice change and overcome hesitancy to change. Rather than draw upon external evidence, practice change within the collaborative was informed by the practices of peer institutions. Both themes were strongly exemplified in one of the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative's largest initiatives-reducing excessive postoperative opioid prescribing. CONCLUSION: In this qualitative study of surgeons participating in statewide collaborative quality improvement, contextualization of individual outcomes and peer learning were the most salient themes. Collaborative quality improvement relied upon comparing one's own performance to peer performance, motivating improvement using this comparison, deriving evidence from peers to inform improvement initiatives, and overcoming hesitancy to change by highlighting peer success.

A national qualitative study of surgical coaching: Opportunities and barriers for colorectal surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Surgical coaching interventions have been recommended as a method of technological skills improvement for individual surgeons and lifelong occupational learning. Patient outcomes for laparoscopic colectomy vary significantly based on surgeon experience and case volume. As surgical coaching is an emerging area, little is known about how surgeons view coaching interventions. METHODS: Semistructured interviews with 68 colorectal surgeons from across the country who were e-mail recruited from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons focused on exploring the attitudes surrounding surgical coaching programs among colorectal surgeons. Interviews were performed via telephone, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim with redaction of identifying information. Interviews were analyzed by iterative steps informed by thematic analysis. RESULTS: Surgeons reported the desire to participate in coaching programs to improve patient outcomes through technical skill advancement, to keep pace with surgical innovation, and to fulfill a desire for lifelong learning. However, surgeons varied in their beliefs over who should be coached, who should coach, the format of coaching, and the topics addressed in coaching. Obstacles identified included time, financial and medicolegal concerns, balance with resident education, and vulnerability. CONCLUSION: Widespread enthusiasm for surgical coaching programs exists among colorectal surgeons. However, there is variability in what surgeons believe an ideal surgical coaching program would look like. Therefore, in alignment with adult learning theory, we recommend the creation of several different models of surgical coaching to allow each surgeon to benefit from this advancement in continuous professional development.

Correlation of Colorectal Surgical Skill With Patient Outcomes: A Cautionary Tale.

BACKGROUND: Previous work has demonstrated a correlation between video ratings of surgical skill and clinical outcomes. Some have proposed the use of video review for technical skill assessment, credentialing, and quality improvement. OBJECTIVE: Before its adoption as a quality measure for colorectal surgeons, we must first determine whether video-based skill assessments can predict patient outcomes among specialty surgeons. DESIGN: Twenty-one surgeons submitted one representative video of a minimally invasive colectomy. Each video was edited to highlight key steps and then rated by 10 peer surgeons using a validated American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons assessment tool. Linking surgeons' ratings to a validated surgical outcomes registry, we assessed the relationship between skill and risk-adjusted complication rates. SETTINGS: The study was conducted with the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, a statewide collaborative including 70 community, academic, and tertiary hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients included those who underwent minimally invasive colorectal resection performed by the participating surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures included 30-day risk-adjusted postoperative complications. RESULTS: The average technical skill rating for each surgeon ranged from 2.6 to 4.6. Risk-adjusted complication rate per surgeon ranged from 9.9% to 33.1%. Patients of surgeons in the bottom quartile of overall skill ratings were older and more likely to have hypertension or to smoke; patients of surgeons in the top quartile were more likely to be immunosuppressed or have an ASA score of 3 or higher. After patient- and surgery-specific risk adjustment, there was no statistically significant difference in complication rates between the bottom and top quartile surgeons (17.5% vs 16.8%, respectively, p = 0.41). LIMITATIONS: Limitations included retrospective cohort design with short-term follow-up of sampled cases. Videos were edited to highlight key steps, and reviewers did not undergo training to establish norms. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that video-based peer rating of minimally invasive colectomy was not correlated with postoperative complications among specialty surgeons. As such, the adoption of video review for use in credentialing should be approached with caution. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B802.CORRELACIÓN ENTRE LA HABILIDAD QUIRÚRGICA COLORRECTAL Y LOS RESULTADOS OBTENIDOS EN EL PACIENTE: RELATO PRECAUTORIOANTECEDENTES:Trabajos anteriores han demostrado una correlación entre la video-calificación de la habilidad quirúrgica y los resultados clínicos. Algunos autores han propuesto el uso de la revisión de videos para la evaluación de la habilidad técnica, la acreditación y la mejoría en la calidad quirúrgica.OBJETIVO:Antes de su adopción como medida de calidad entre los cirujanos colorrectales, primero debemos determinar si las evaluaciones de habilidades basadas en video pueden predecir los resultados clínicos de los pacientes entre cirujanos especializados.DISEÑO:Veintiún cirujanos enviaron un video representativo de una colectomía mínimamente invasiva. Cada video fue editado para resaltar los pasos clave y luego fué calificado por 10 cirujanos revisores utilizando una herramienta de evaluación validada por la ASCRS. Al vincular las calificaciones de los cirujanos al registro de resultados quirúrgicos aprobado, evaluamos la relación entre la habilidad y las tasas de complicaciones ajustadas al riesgo.AJUSTE:Colaboración en todo el estado incluyendo 70 hospitales comunitarios, académicos y terciarios, el Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative.PACIENTES:Todos aquellos sometidos a resección colorrectal mínimamente invasiva realizada por los cirujanos participantes.MEDIDA DE RESULTADO PRINCIPAL:Complicaciones posoperatorias ajustadas al riesgo a los 30 días.RESULTADOS:La calificación de la habilidad técnica promedio de cada cirujano osciló entre 2.6 y 4.6. La tasa de complicaciones ajustada al riesgo por cirujano osciló entre el 9,9% y el 33,1%. Los pacientes operados por los cirujanos del cuartil inferior de las calificaciones generales de habilidades eran fumadores y añosos, y tambiés más propensos a la hipertensión arterial. Los pacientes operados por los cirujanos del cuartil superior tenían más probabilidades de ser inmunosuprimidos o tener una puntuación ASA> = 3. Después del ajuste de riesgo específico de la cirugía y el paciente, no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en las tasas de complicaciones entre los cirujanos del cuartil inferior y superior (17,5% frente a 16,8%, respectivamente, p = 0,41).LIMITACIONES:Diseño de cohortes retrospectivo con seguimiento a corto plazo de los casos muestreados. Los videos se editaron para resaltar los pasos clave y los revisores no recibieron capacitación para establecer normas.CONCLUSIONES:Nuestro estudio demuestra que la evaluación realizada por los revisores basada en el video de la colectomía mínimamente invasiva no se correlacionó con las complicaciones post-operatorias entre los cirujanos especialistas. Por tanto, la adopción de la revisión del video quirúrgico para su uso en la acreditación profesional, debe abordarse con mucha precaución. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B802. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo).

The Role of Autologous Flap Reconstruction in Patients with Crohn's Disease Undergoing Abdominoperineal Resection.

BACKGROUND: Patients with symptomatic Crohn's disease who undergo abdominoperineal resection can experience impaired postoperative wound healing. This results in significant morbidity, burdensome dressing changes, and increased postoperative pain. When abdominoperineal resection is performed for oncological reasons, autologous flap reconstruction is occasionally performed to optimize wound healing and reconstruction outcomes. However, the role of flap reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for Crohn's disease has not been established. OBJECTIVE: This study examines the utility of flap reconstruction in patients with symptomatic Crohn's disease undergoing abdominoperineal resection. We hypothesize that patients with immediate flap reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection will demonstrate improved wound healing. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective chart review. SETTINGS: Eligible patients at our institution were identified from 2010 to 2018 by using a combination of Current Procedural Terminology, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. PATIENTS: Of 40 adult patients diagnosed with Crohn's disease, 20 underwent abdominoperineal resection only and 20 underwent abdominoperineal resection with flap reconstruction. INTERVENTIONS: Immediate autologous flap reconstruction was performed after abdominoperineal resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the presence of postoperative perineal wounds and postoperative wound care burden. RESULTS: Patients in the abdominoperineal resection with flap reconstruction group demonstrated significantly worse preoperative disease traits, including fistula burden, than patients in the abdominoperineal resection only group. A lower number of patients tended to be associated with a persistent perineal wound in the flap group at 30 days (abdominoperineal resection with flap reconstruction = 55% vs abdominoperineal resection only = 70%; p = 0.327) and at 6 months (abdominoperineal resection with flap reconstruction = 25% vs abdominoperineal resection only = 40%; p = 0.311) postoperatively. There was also a trend toward a lower incidence of complications in the flap group. Patients in the abdominoperineal resection with flap reconstruction group tended to experience lower postoperative pain than patients in the abdominoperineal resection only group. LIMITATIONS: This retrospective cohort study was limited by its reliance on data in electronic medical records, and by its small sample size and the fact that it was a single-institution study. CONCLUSIONS: In select patients who have severe perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease, there may be a benefit to immediate flap reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection to lower postoperative wound care burden without significant intraoperative or postoperative risk. In addition, flap reconstruction may lead to lower postoperative pain. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B416. EL ROL DE LA RECONSTRUCCIN CON COLGAJO AUTLOGO EN PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN SOMETIDOS A RESECCIN ABDOMINOPERINEAL: ANTECEDENTES:Los pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn sintomática que se someten a una resección abdominoperineal pueden experimentar una curación posoperatoria deficiente de la herida. Esto da como resultado una morbilidad significativa, cambios de apósito molestos y un aumento del dolor posoperatorio. Cuando se realiza una resección abdominoperineal por razones oncológicas, ocasionalmente se realiza una reconstrucción con colgajo autólogo para optimizar los resultados de la curación y reconstrucción de la herida. Sin embargo, no se ha establecido la función de la reconstrucción con colgajo después de la resección abdominoperineal para la enfermedad de Crohn.OBJETIVO:Este estudio examina la utilidad de la reconstrucción con colgajo en pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn sintomática sometidos a resección abdominoperineal. Presumimos que los pacientes con reconstrucción inmediata con colgajo después de la resección abdominoperineal demostrarán una mejor curación de la herida.DISEÑO:Revisión retrospectiva de expedientes.MARCO:Los pacientes elegibles en nuestra institución se identificaron entre 2010 y 2018 mediante una combinación de los códigos de Terminología actual de procedimientos, Clasificación internacional de enfermedades 9 y Clasificación internacional de enfermedades 10.PACIENTES:Cuarenta pacientes adultos diagnosticados con enfermedad de Crohn que se someten a resección abdominoperineal solamente (APR-solo = 20) y resección abdominoperineal con reconstrucción con colgajo (APR-colgajo = 20).INTERVENCIÓN (ES):Reconstrucción inmediata con colgajo autólogo después de la resección abdominoperineal.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES:Presencia de herida perineal posoperatoria y carga de cuidado de la herida posoperatoria.RESULTADOS:Los pacientes del grupo APR-colgajo demostraron rasgos de enfermedad preoperatoria significativamente peores, incluida la carga de la fístula, en comparación con los pacientes del grupo APR-solo. Un número menor de pacientes tendió a asociarse con una herida perineal persistente en el grupo de colgajo a los 30 días (APR-colgajo = 55% vs APR-solo = 70%; p = 0.327) y 6 meses (APR-colgajo = 25% vs APR-solo = 40%; p = 0.311) postoperatoriamente. También hubo una tendencia hacia una menor incidencia de complicaciones en el grupo APR-colgajo. Los pacientes del grupo APR-colgajo tendieron a experimentar menos dolor posoperatorio en comparación con el grupo APR-solo.LIMITACIONES:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo basado en datos de historias clínicas electrónicas. Tamaño de muestra pequeño y estudio de una sola institución.CONCLUSIONES:En pacientes seleccionados que tienen enfermedad de Crohn fistulizante perianal grave, la reconstrucción inmediata del colgajo después de la resección abdominoperineal puede beneficiar a reducir la carga posoperatoria del cuidado de la herida sin riesgo intraoperatorio o posoperatorio significativo. Además, la reconstrucción con colgajo puede resultar un dolor posoperatorio menor. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B416.

Timing of surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancer: a retrospective analysis from an academic medical center.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) has been shown to achieve decreased local recurrence (LR) with lower toxicity in rectal cancer patients, but data confirming the optimal timing of surgery following this therapy is less robust. METHODS: The University of Iowa Cancer Registry was queried to identify all patients with stages II-III rectal cancer who received nCRT and surgery from 2000 through 2012. Primary endpoints were time interval to surgery (TI), and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included pathologic outcomes, perioperative morbidities and postoperative complications. Patient characteristics and treatment regimens were compared. Univariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to study the association between TI and OS. Associations of TI with secondary endpoints were tested using Chi-square tests of association. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients presented with stages II-III rectal cancer. Mean TI was 9.92 weeks. There was no significant association between TI and OS when comparing <8 to ≥8 weeks (P=0.23) or when considering the interval as a continuous variable (P=0.85). Increased LOS [median 7.00 days, P=0.05, HR 1.03 (1.00-1.06)] did correlate with worse survival outcomes. Delaying surgery beyond 8 weeks was associated with increased risk for wound infection (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: OS was not influenced by longer intervals between nCRT and surgery. Delaying surgery beyond 8 weeks was associated with increased risk for wound infection.

Prospective Validation of the Iowa Rectal Surgery Risk Calculator.

BACKGROUND: The Iowa Rectal Surgery Risk Calculator estimates risk for proctectomy procedures. The Iowa Calculator performed well on NSQIP 2010-2011 training and 2005-2009 validation datasets, but was not prospectively validated and did not include low anterior resections. This study sought to demonstrate validity on new independent data, to update the calculator to include low anterior resection, and to compare performance to other risk assessment tools. METHODS: Non-emergent ACS-NSQIP proctectomy and low anterior resection data from 2010 to 2015 (n = 65,683) were included. The Iowa Calculator generated risk estimates for 30-day morbidity using 2012-2015 data. An Updated Calculator used 2010-2011 training data to include low anterior resection, with validation on 2012-2015 data. NSQIP data provided NSQIP Morbidity Model predictions and a custom web-script collected ACS-NSQIP Online Surgical Risk Calculator predictions for all patients. RESULTS: Proctectomy morbidity (not including low anterior resection) decreased from 40.4% in 2010-2011 to 37.0% in 2012-2015. Low anterior resection had lower morbidity (22.4% in 2012-15). The Iowa Calculator demonstrated good discrimination and calibration using 2012-2015 data (C-statistic 0.676, deviance + 9.2%). After including low anterior resection, the Updated Iowa Calculator performed well during training (c-statistic 0.696, deviance 0%) and validation (C-statistic 0.706, deviance + 7.9%). The Updated Iowa Calculator had significantly better discrimination and calibration than morbidity predictions from the ACS Online Calculator (C-statistic 0.693, P < 0.001, deviance - 28.1%) and NSQIP General/Vascular Surgery Model (C-statistic 0.703, P < 0.05, deviance - 40.8%). CONCLUSION: When applied to new independent data, the Iowa Calculator supplies accurate risk estimates. The Updated Iowa Calculator includes low anterior resection, and both are prospectively validated. Risk estimation by the Iowa Calculators was superior to ACS-provided risk tools.

Surgeon Variation in Complications With Minimally Invasive and Open Colectomy: Results From the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative.

IMPORTANCE: Minimally invasive colectomy (MIC) is an increasingly common surgical procedure. Although case series and controlled prospective trials have found the procedure to be safe, it is unclear whether safe adaptation of this approach from open colectomy (OC) is occurring among surgeons. OBJECTIVE: To assess rates of complications for MIC compared with OC among surgeons. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed 5196 patients who underwent MIC or OC from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2015, by 97 surgeons in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, with each surgeon performing at least 10 OCs and 10 MICs. Hierarchical regression was used to assess surgeon variation in adjusted rates of complications and the association of these outcomes across approaches. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary study outcome measurements included overall 30-day complication rates, variation in complication rates among surgeons, and surgeon rank by complication rate for MIC vs OC. RESULTS: Of the 5196 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.9 [14.4] years; 2842 [54.7%] female; 4429 [85.2%] white), 3118 (60.0%) underwent MIC and 2078 (40.0%) underwent OC. Overall, 1149 patients (22.1%) experienced complications (702 [33.8%] in the OC group vs 447 [14.3%] in the MIC group; P < .001). For MIC, the rates of complications varied from 8.8% to 25.9% among surgeons. For OC, rates of complications were higher but varied less (1.7-fold) among surgeons, ranging from 25.9% to 43.8%. Among the 97 surgeons ranked, the mean change in ranking between OC and MIC was 25 positions. The top 10 surgeons ranged in rank from 6 of 97 for OC to 89 of 97 for MIC. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Surgeon-level variation in complications was nearly twice as great for MIC than for OC among surgeons enrolled in a statewide quality collaborative. Moreover, surgeon rankings for OC outcomes differed substantially from outcomes for those same surgeons performing MIC. This finding implies a need for improved training in adoption of MIC techniques among some surgeons.

Robotic proctectomy for rectal cancer: analysis of 71 patients from a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing use of robotic surgery for rectal cancer, few series have been published from the practice of generalizable US surgeons. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for 71 consecutive patients who underwent robotic low anterior resection (LAR) or abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2014. RESULTS: 46 LARs (65%) and 25 APRs (35%) were identified. Median procedure time was 219 minutes (IQR 184-275) and mean blood loss 164.9 cc (SD 155.9 cc). Radial margin was negative in 70/71 (99%) patients. Total mesorectal excision integrity was complete/near complete in 38/39 (97%) of graded specimens. A mean of 16.8 (SD+/- 8.9) lymph nodes were retrieved. At median follow-up of 21.9 months, there were no local recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic proctectomy for rectal cancer was introduced into typical colorectal surgery practice by a single surgeon, with a low conversion rate, low complication rate, and satisfactory oncologic outcomes.

Right Colectomy and Abdominal Perineal Resection for Cancer: Do Urinary Tract Infections Impact Outcomes?

BACKGROUND: We aim to assess the patient factors and concomitant infectious outcomes associated with urinary tract infection (UTI) occurrence and the impact of UTI on length of stay (LOS), re-admission, and death in a colorectal surgical population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program User Data for right colectomy and abdominal perineal resection (APR) procedures for cancer between 2006 and 2012 were analyzed. Concomitant infectious complications and timing of UTI diagnosis, inpatient versus outpatient, were considered. RESULTS: We identified 7,615 right colectomies with 107 (1.4%) UTIs and 2,493 APRs with 88 (3.5%) UTIs (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis and correction for other post-operative complications, UTI remained statistically correlated with prolonged LOS for right colectomy and APR (LOS increases of 59.0% and 37.4%, respectively, p < 0.001) but not death. Patients with a diagnosis of UTI after discharge showed significantly increased re-admission rates compared with UTI diagnosis before discharge (37.7% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After excluding deaths, outpatient UTI occurrences, and correcting for other infectious complications, UTI is associated with increased LOS but is not correlated with re-admission or death. Outpatient occurrence of UTI after hospital discharge is associated with a dramatic re-admission rate of 37.7%.

Anastomotic leak after colorectal resection: A population-based study of risk factors and hospital variation.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak is a major source of morbidity in colorectal operations and has become an area of interest in performance metrics. It is unclear whether anastomotic leak is associated primarily with surgeons' technical performance or explained better by patient characteristics and institutional factors. We sought to establish if anastomotic leak could serve as a valid quality metric in colorectal operations by evaluating provider variation after adjusting for patient factors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of colorectal resection patients in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative. Clinically relevant patient and operative factors were tested for association with anastomotic leak. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to derive risk-adjusted rates of anastomotic leak. RESULTS: Of 9,192 colorectal resections, 244 (2.7%) had a documented anastomotic leak. The incidence of anastomotic leak was 3.0% for patients with pelvic anastomoses and 2.5% for those with intra-abdominal anastomoses. Multivariable analysis showed that a greater operative duration, male sex, body mass index >30 kg/m2, tobacco use, chronic immunosuppressive medications, thrombocytosis (platelet count >400 × 109/L), and urgent/emergency operations were independently associated with anastomotic leak (C-statistic = 0.75). After accounting for patient and procedural risk factors, 5 hospitals had a significantly greater incidence of postoperative anastomotic leak. CONCLUSION: This population-based study shows that risk factors for anastomotic leak include male sex, obesity, tobacco use, immunosuppression, thrombocytosis, greater operative duration, and urgent/emergency operation; models including these factors predict most of the variation in anastomotic leak rates. This study suggests that anastomotic leak can serve as a valid metric that can identify opportunities for quality improvement.

A Retrospective, Single-institution Review of Loop Ileostomy Reversal Outcomes.

Although loop ileostomies are created to mitigate the risk of anastomotic leaks, their reversal is associated with significant morbidity. Complications such as ileostomy site hernia and wound infections are not uncommon. A retrospective study was conducted among 176 consecutive patients who had undergone ileostomy reversal between September 2009 and November 2012 at a tertiary care teaching hospital. The main purpose of the study was to compare differences in short-term outcomes associated with hand-sewn versus stapled anastomotic techniques and purse-string versus stapled/sutured skin closure versus wounds left to heal by secondary intention. Primary outcomes analyzed were length of stay (LOS), wound infection rates, and incisional hernia occurrence. All variables were abstracted from electronic medical records. Surgical techniques used were based on surgeon preference. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare closure technique, age, body mass index (BMI), and hemoglobin; ANOVA was used to compare the remaining continuous/ordinal variables. Anastomotic technique, age, BMI, and hemoglobin were compared using the t-test, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the remaining continuous/ordinal variables. Age, BMI, and hemoglobin were compared using t-test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the remaining continuous/ordinal variables. Univariate analysis for preoperative factors associated with postoperative hernia was performed as a secondary analysis due to hernia rates higher than reported in the literature. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Of the 176 patients (median age 53, median BMI 26), 53% were male. The number of hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses were similar (89 versus 87, respectively) and purse-string skin closures were more common (n = 108) than stapled (n = 45) closures or wounds left to heal by secondary intention (n = 23). The mean follow up time for all patients was 16.9 months (508 days, range 8-1406 days); the overall complication rate was 35.4%. LOS was shorter in the hand-sewn anastomoses than in the stapled anastomoses' group (3.36 days versus 3.82 days, P = 0.028) due to a greater proportion of patients with shorter stay (44 out of 89 [49%] 1 to 2 days versus 28 out of 87 [32%], hand-sewn versus stapled, respectively). No statistically significant differences were found in short-term outcomes among the 3 skin closure techniques, including wound infections (8 out of 108 [7%] in purse-string versus 2 out of 45 [4%] in stapled/sutured versus 0 out of 23 [0%] in open wounds, P = 0.84). Ileostomy site hernia (16.5%) was associated with a significantly higher BMI (32.2 with hernia versus 26.1 without, P <0.0001) and longer follow-up time (25.1 months with hernia versus 11.5 months without, P = 0.0003). In this study, anastomotic and skin closure technique did not result in clinically important differences in short-term outcomes. The results suggest that, depending on BMI, preoperative loop ileostomy closure counseling of patients should include the risk of developing an incisional hernia.

Comparison of Risk Factors for Unplanned Conversion from Laparoscopic and Robotic to Open Colorectal Surgery Using the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) Database.

Robotic colorectal surgery has been shown to have lower rates of unplanned conversion to open surgery when compared to laparoscopic surgery. Risk factors associated with conversion from robotic to open colectomy and comparisons of the risk factors between robotic and laparoscopic approaches have not been previously reported. Patients who underwent elective laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries between July 1, 2012 and April 28, 2015, were identified in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative registry. Candidate covariates were identified, and hierarchical logistic regression models were used to identify risk factors for conversion. There were 4796 cases that met study inclusion criteria. Conversion was required in 18.2 % of laparoscopic and 7.7 % of robotic cases (p < 0.0001). Risk factors for conversion in the laparoscopic group included the following: moderate/severe adhesions, obesity, colorectal cancer, hypertension, rectal operations, urgent priority, and tobacco use. Risk factors for conversion in the robotic group included the following: severe adhesions, bleeding disorder, presence of cancer, cirrhosis, and use of statins. Higher surgeon volume was protective in both groups. Conversion rates are lower for robotic than for laparoscopic colorectal surgery with fewer predictors of conversion. Recognition of factors predicting conversion may allow surgeons to choose an operative approach that optimizes the benefits of the available technologies.

Postoperative complications and patient satisfaction: does payer status have an impact?

BACKGROUND: Patient demographics and outcomes may influence patient satisfaction. We aim to investigate the relationship between postoperative complications and survey-based satisfaction in the context of payer status. METHODS: Institutional data were used to identify major complication occurrence and linked to patient satisfaction surveys. The impact of complication occurrence on satisfaction was investigated and stratified by payer status. RESULTS: In all, 1,597 encounters were identified with an 18% major complication rate. Satisfaction scores in specific domains were significantly more likely to be above the median for patients without complications (P < .01) and for payer status Medicaid/low income (P < .05). In sensitivity analyses, we found no significant interactions among payer status, complications, and satisfaction scores. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences exist for individual satisfaction survey domains between patients with and without major postoperative complications and by payer status. Payer status was not found to have an impact on the intersection of major complications and patient satisfaction.

Single-incision robotic colectomy: are costs prohibitive?

BACKGROUND: The feasibility, safety, and costs of single-incision robotic colectomy (SIRC) are not known. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted, comparing the initial 29 consecutive SIRC procedures performed to 36 multiport laparoscopic colectomies (MLC). RESULTS: The groups did not differ significantly on age, body mass index, gender, ASA classification, smoking status, steroid usage or rate of diabetes. Procedure time, conversion rate, infectious complications and length of stay did not differ significantly. The ratio of observed:expected direct hospital costs statistically favoured MLC, although there was no statistical difference between groups for contribution margin, or for observed and expected direct hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate safety and technical feasibility for SIRC in selected patients with short-term outcomes and hospital costs comparable to MLC. Contribution margin remained positive and expected costs exceeded observed for SIRC. Increased costs for SIRC are a concern. The comparable but relatively high mortality in both groups may represent an institutional approach to colectomy where significant comorbidity is not a contraindication to minimally invasive surgery. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Impact of urinary tract infection definitions on colorectal outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (UTIs) significantly impact hospital outcomes. Colorectal surgery is inherently high risk for postoperative infections including UTI, and these patients may have unique outcomes as compared to other medical and surgical hospitalizations. We aim to assess the impact of the differing definitions of UTI captured by our hospital quality measures on hospital charges, length of stay (LOS), and mortality after colorectal resections at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Existing hospital quality surveillance was used to retrospectively identify postcolorectal resection UTI, as defined by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)-defined catheter-associated UTIs (CAUTI), from 2006-2012. Both groups were compared to colorectal resections performed during the same period that did not develop a UTI. Groups were compared for differences in 30-d surgical outcomes with multivariate analysis of total hospital charges and LOS. RESULTS: During our study period, we identified 18 CAUTIs and 42 NSQIP-UTI, and 1064 other colorectal resections (UTI rate, 5.3%). Our overall mortality rate was 4.4% and was not associated with CAUTI or NSQIP-UTI on univariate analysis. CAUTI, but not NSQIP-UTI, was associated with a 73% increase in LOS and 70% increase in total hospital charges on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: By reviewing quality outcomes surveillance modalities at our hospital, we identified postcolorectal resection CAUTI, but not NSQIP-UTI, to be associated with increased total hospital charges and LOS. Neither was associated with mortality.

Differences in short-term outcomes among patients undergoing IPAA with or without preoperative radiation: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.

BACKGROUND: Single-institution studies demonstrate a correlation between preoperative pelvic radiation and poor long-term pouch function after IPAA. The rarity of the radiated pelvis before these procedures limits the ability to draw conclusions on the effects of preoperative radiation on short-term outcomes, which may contribute to long-term pouch dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to better understand the impact of pelvic radiation on short-term outcomes in patients undergoing IPAA. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005-2011). SETTINGS: The study was conducted at all participating NSQIP institutions. PATIENTS: The cohort was composed of patients undergoing nonemergent IPAA procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of patients experiencing postoperative complications within 30 days were compared by Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests based on whether they received preoperative radiation. Multivariate logistic regression models controlled for the effects of multiple risk factors. RESULTS: Included were 3172 patients receiving IPAA; 162 received pelvic radiation. The postoperative complication rate was not significantly different in patients receiving pelvic radiation versus not receiving pelvic radiation (p = 0.06). In a subset of patients with cancer diagnoses (n = 598), 157 received pelvic radiation; complication rates were not significantly different (p = 0.16). Patients receiving pelvic radiation had significantly lower rates of sepsis in both the overall and cancer diagnosis groups (p = 0.005 and p = 0.047), a finding which persisted after controlling for the effects of multiple risk factors (multivariate p values = 0.030 and 0.047). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective database design with short-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received radiation before IPAA had no difference in overall 30-day complication rates but had significantly lower rates of sepsis when compared with patients not receiving pelvic radiation. The perceived inferior long-term pouch function in patients undergoing preoperative pelvic radiation does not appear to be attributable to increases in 30-day complications.

Crohn's disease but not diverticulitis is an independent risk factor for surgical site infections in colectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSIs) after colectomy for colon cancer (CC), Crohn's disease (CD), and diverticulitis (DD) significantly impact both the immediate postoperative course and long-term disease-specific outcomes. We aim to profile the effect of diagnosis on SSI after segmental colectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data set. METHOD: NSQIP data from 2006 to 2011 were investigated, and segmental colectomy procedures performed for the diagnoses of Crohn's disease, DD, and colon malignancy were included. SSI complications were compared by diagnosis using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULT: We included 35,557 colectomy cases in the analysis. CD had the highest rate of postoperative SSI (17 vs. 13% DD vs. 10% CC; p < 0.001). Using CC as the comparison group and controlling for multiple variables, the multivariate analysis showed that the CD group had an increased risk for acquiring at least one SSI (odds ratio (OR) = 1.38, p ≤ 0.001), deep incisional SSI (OR = 1.85, p = 0.03), and organ space SSI (OR = 1.51, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing segmental colectomy in the NSQIP data set, statistically significant increases in SSI are seen in CD, but not DD, when compared to CC, thus confirming CD as an independent risk factor for SSI.