The importance of methods for site performance evaluation in REPRIEVE, a longitudinal, global, multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: REPRIEVE, the Randomized Trial to Prevent Vascular Events in HIV, is a multicenter, primary prevention trial evaluating whether a statin can prevent major cardiovascular events in people with HIV. REPRIEVE is conducted at >100 clinical research sites (CRSs) globally. Detailed, comprehensive, and novel methods for evaluating and communicating CRS performance are required to ensure trial integrity and data quality. In this analysis we describe a comprehensive multidimensional methodology for evaluating CRS performance. METHODS: The REPRIEVE Data Coordinating and Clinical Coordinating Centers developed a robust system for evaluation of and communication with CRSs, designed to identify potential issues and obstacles to performance, provide real-time technical support, and make recommendations for process improvements to facilitate efficient trial execution. We describe these systems and evaluate their impact on participant retention, data management, and specimen management from 2019 to 2022, corresponding to the period from end of recruitment to present. This evaluation was based on pre-defined metrics, regular reviews, and bidirectional communication. RESULTS: Participant retention, data management, and specimen management all remained steady over the three-year period, although metrics varied by country of enrollment. Targeted messaging relating to certain performance metrics was effective. CONCLUSION: Site performance is vital to ensure trial integrity and achievement of key trial goals. This analysis demonstrates that utilization of a comprehensive approach allows for a thorough evaluation of CRS performance, facilitates data and specimen management, and enhances participant retention. Our approach may serve as a guidepost for maximizing future large-scale clinical trials' operational success and scientific rigor. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT02344290.

Pharmacokinetics of an increased atazanavir dose with and without tenofovir during the third trimester of pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Reduced atazanavir exposure has been demonstrated during pregnancy with standard atazanavir/ritonavir dosing. We studied an increased dose during the third trimester of pregnancy. METHODS: International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group 1026s is a prospective, nonblinded, pharmacokinetic study of HIV-infected pregnant women taking antiretrovirals for clinical indications, including 2 cohorts (with or without tenofovir) receiving atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg once daily during the second trimester, 400/100 mg during the third trimester, and 300/100 mg postpartum (PP). Intensive steady-state 24-hour pharmacokinetic profiles were performed. Atazanavir concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic targets were the 10th percentile atazanavir area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) (29.4 µg·hr·mL·) in nonpregnant adults on standard dose and 0.15 µg/mL, minimum trough concentration. RESULTS: Atazanavir pharmacokinetic data were available for 37 women without tenofovir, 35 with tenofovir; median (range) pharmacokinetic parameters are presented for second trimester, third trimester, and PP and number who met target/total. ATAZANAVIR WITHOUT TENOFOVIR: AUC 30.5 (9.19-93.8), 45.7 (11-88.3), and 48.8 (9.9-112.2) µg·hr·mL, and 8/14, 29/37, and 27/34 met target. C24 h was 0.49 (0.09-4.09), 0.71 (0.14-2.09), and 0.90 (0.05-2.73) µg/mL; 13/14, 36/37, and 29/34 met target. ATAZANAVIR WITH TENOFOVIR: AUC 26.2 (6.8-60.9) (P < 0.05 compared with PP), 37.7 (0.72-88.2) (P < 0.05 compared with PP), and 58.6 (6-149) µg·hr·mL, and 7/17, 23/32, and 27/29 met target. C24 h was 0.44 (0.12-1.06) (P < 0.05 compared with PP), 0.57 (0.02-2.06) (P < 0.05 compared with PP), and 1.26 (0.09-5.43) µg/mL; 7/17, 23/32, and 27/29 met target. Atazanavir/ritonavir was well tolerated with no unanticipated adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Atazanavir/ritonavir increased to 400/100 mg provides adequate atazanavir exposure during the third trimester and should be considered during the second trimester.

The Irritable Bowel Syndrome Outcome Study (IBSOS): rationale and design of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with 12 month follow up of self- versus clinician-administered CBT for moderate to severe irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome is a common, oftentimes disabling, gastrointestinal disorder whose full range of symptoms has no satisfactory medical or dietary treatment. One of the few empirically validated treatments includes a specific psychological therapy called cognitive behavior therapy which, if available, is typically administered over several months by trained practitioners in tertiary care settings. There is an urgent need to develop more efficient versions of CBT that require minimal professional assistance but retain the efficacy profile of clinic based CBT. The Irritable Bowel Syndrome Outcome Study (IBSOS) is a multicenter, placebo-controlled randomized trial to evaluate whether a self-administered version of CBT is, at least as efficacious as standard CBT and more efficacious than an attention control in reducing core GI symptoms of IBS and its burden (e.g. distress, quality of life impairment, etc.) in moderately to severely affected IBS patients. Additional goals are to assess, at quarterly intervals, the durability of treatment response over a 12 month period; to identify clinically useful patient characteristics associated with outcome as a way of gaining an understanding of subgroups of participants for whom CBT is most beneficial; to identify theory-based change mechanisms (active ingredients) that explain how and why CBT works; and evaluate the economic costs and benefits of CBT. Between August 2010 when IBSOS began recruiting subjects and February 2012, the IBSOS randomized 171 of 480 patients. Findings have the potential to improve the health of IBS patients, reduce its social and economic costs, conserve scarce health care resources, and inform evidence-based practice guidelines.