A South Australian population-based study of congenital talipes equinovarus.

The aims of this study were to provide a population-based prevalence for congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV), to conduct an epidemiological investigation into the risk factors for CTEV and describe associated features. The study used a retrospective case-control design of CTEV notified to the South Australian Birth Defects Register between 1986 and 1996 inclusive, linking characteristics of mother and baby from the perinatal data collection. The prevalence of isolated CTEV was 1.1/1000 total births (n = 231). Four factors were significantly associated with an increased risk of CTEV: maternal Aboriginal race (ORadj = 2.0; 95% CI 1.1, 3.6), male gender (ORadj = 2.4; 95% CI 1.8, 3.2), maternal anaemia (ORadj = 1.8; 95% CI 1.0, 2.9) and maternal hyperemesis (ORadj = 3.6; 95% CI 1.3, 9.8). The prevalence of CTEV associated with another birth defect or syndrome (n = 157) was 0.7/1000 total births. CTEV was associated with specific birth defects and also with oligohydramnios when another birth defect was present.

The impact of maternal serum screening on the birth prevalence of Down's syndrome and the use of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in South Australia.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact of maternal serum screening on the birth prevalence of Down's syndrome and on the use of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in South Australia. DESIGN: A descriptive population-based study. SETTING: South Australia (population 1.48 million persons; approximately 20,000 births per year). PARTICIPANTS: Women who had births or terminations of pregnancy with Down's syndrome in 1982-1996, women who had maternal serum screening in 1991-1996, amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling in 1986-1996. METHODS: Analysis of data from multiple sources on maternal serum screening, amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling, births and terminations of pregnancy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total prevalence and birth prevalence of Down's syndrome each year in 1982-1996; proportion of pregnant women using maternal serum screening in 1991-1996, and proportion using amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling by indication in 1986-1996, by age group. RESULTS: Use of maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome increased from 17% when introduced in 1991 to 76% of women who gave birth in 1996. Between 1982 and 1986 and 1996, terminations of pregnancy for fetal Down's syndrome increased from 7.1 % to 75% and the birth prevalence of Down's syndrome fell by 60% from 1.05 to 0.42 per 1,000 births, against the background of an increase in total prevalence due to increasing maternal age. The use of amniocentesis increased from 5.8% in 1991 to 10.1% in 1996 mainly due to the increase among women younger than 35 years with maternal serum screening as the main reason. The increasing chorionic villus sampling rate among younger women stabilised at 0.4%, while the rate among older women decreased from 11.0% to 7.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of maternal serum screening in South Australia has resulted in increased use of any prenatal testing for Down's syndrome from about 7% (mainly older women having amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling) to 84% of women (about 8% having direct amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling and 76% having maternal serum screening first). This has resulted in a significant fall in the birth prevalence of Down's syndrome. maternal serum screening was the first indication of Down's syndrome for about half the terminations of pregnancy for Down's syndrome in 1993-1996, including three quarters of those in younger women.

Late diagnosis of congenital dislocation of the hip and presence of a screening programme: South Australian population-based study.

BACKGROUND: The Medical Research Council Working Party on Congenital Dislocation of the Hip have reported an ascertainment-adjusted incidence of a first operative procedure for congenital dislocation of the hip (CDH) of 0.78 per 1000 livebirths, which is similar to the incidence of CDH before the start of the UK screening programme. The report showed that CDH had not been detected by routine screening before age 3 months in 70% of children reported to the national orthopaedic surveillance scheme. This report raised concerns about the merit of screening at birth for CDH. We aimed to find out the incidence of an operative procedure for CDH in the first 5 years of life among children born in South Australia between 1988 and 1993, and the proportion of these patients that were detected at age 3 months or older. METHODS: The state's database for inpatient separations between January, 1988, and April, 1998 was searched. Case records were examined for the age and circumstances of diagnosis, and type of operative procedures. Prevalence rates of CDH were obtained from the South Australian Birth Defects Register, which receives notifications from a statutory perinatal data collection of birth defects detected at birth and subsequent voluntary notifications for children up to age 5 years. FINDINGS: Of the 55 children born in South Australia between 1988 and 1993 identified as having non-teratological CDH and operative procedures, only 22 (40%) had been diagnosed at age 3 months or older. 18 had an open reduction of the hip joint or osteotomy, or both, and the remainder had arthrograms, closed reductions, and/or tenotomy. The prevalence of non-teratological CDH in children was 7.74 per 1000 livebirths. The incidence of surgery for CDH in the first 5 years of life was 0.46 per 1000 livebirths (95% CI 0.34-0.59) and only 0.19 per 1000 livebirths (0.11-0.26) for those diagnosed late (age 3 months or older). These children diagnosed late represented 2.4% of all known cases of CDH. INTERPRETATION: Only 2.4% of known cases of CDH in children born in South Australia had been detected late and required surgery. These results show that a screening programme for CDH can be successful, contrary to the findings of the UK Medical Research Council Working Party.

A population-based study of abdominal wall defects in South Australia and Western Australia.

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence, clinical characteristics, prenatal diagnosis and occurrence of other birth defects with abdominal wall defects in births and terminations of pregnancy in South Australia (SA) and Western Australia (WA) over the period 1980-90. Cases of gastroschisis, exomphalos, bladder exstrophy, cloacal exstrophy and body stalk anomaly were ascertained from the WA Birth Defects Registry (1980-90) and the SA Birth Defects Register (1986-90). The registers are comparable population-based data collections with information on livebirths and stillbirths of at least 400 g birthweight or 20 weeks' gestation, and terminations of pregnancy for fetal abnormality. The prevalence of gastroschisis was 1.65/10,000 births (59 cases) and of exomphalos 2.90/10,000 births (104 cases). There was no significant difference in prevalence of exomphalos or gastroschisis between SA and WA for the years 1986-90. However, if data from WA for the years 1980-85 were included, SA had a significantly higher prevalence of exomphalos (prevalence ratio 1.71, confidence interval [CI] 1.16-2.55), although not of gastroschisis (prevalence ratio 1.35, CI 0.79-2.32). Exomphalos was significantly more common in mothers < 20 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.45, CI 1.22-4.86) and in mothers of 40 years or older (OR 5.65, CI 1.69-16.77). Gastroschisis was more common in younger mothers (OR 8.76, CI 4.02-19.32). Both exomphalos and gastroschisis were associated with low birthweight, prematurity, intrauterine growth retardation and caesarean section. The reason for the higher prevalence of exomphalos in SA than WA was not clear, but may be related to differences in prenatal diagnosis. The association between maternal age < 20 years and exomphalos raises the possibility of common factors in the aetiology of gastroschisis and exomphalos.

Perinatal risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

AIMS: To identify perinatal risk factors for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and define the risk for each factor. METHODS: In this case control study, using logistic regression analysis, all 1127 cases of isolated DDH live born in South Australia in 1986-93 and notified to the South Australian Birth Defects Register were included; controls comprised 150130 live births in South Australia during the same period without any notified congenital abnormalities. RESULTS: Breech presentation, oligohydramnios, female sex and primiparity were confirmed as risk factors for DDH. Significant findings were an increased risk for vaginal delivery over caesarean section for breech presentation (as well as an increased risk for emergency section over elective section), high birthweight (> or = 4000 g), postmaturity and older maternal age; multiple births and preterm births had a reduced risk. There was no increased risk for caesarean section in the absence of breech presentation. For breech presentation, the risk of DDH was estimated to be at least 2.7% for girls and 0.8% for boys; a combination of factors increased the risk. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that the risk factors identified be used as indications for repeat screening at 6 weeks of age and whenever possible in infancy. Other indications are family history and associated abnormalities.