ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clinical MRI protocols are time-consuming; hence, new faster techniques are needed. One new fast multicontrast MRI technique, called echo planar image mix (EPIMix) (including contrasts T1 -FLAIR, T2 -weighted, diffusion-weighted images [DWI], apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], T2 *-weighted, and T2 -FLAIR images) needs to be tested. PURPOSE: To assess if EPIMix has comparable diagnostic performance as routine clinical brain MRI. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: A consecutive series of 103 patients' brain MRI (January 2018 to May 2018). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5 T or 3T. EPIMix and routine clinical protocol (clinical MRI included all or some of the contrasts T1 -FLAIR, T2 -weighted, DWI, T2 *-weighted, T2 -FLAIR, 3D-FSE). ASSESSMENT: Two neuroradiologists assessed EPIMix and clinical scans and categorized the images as abnormal or normal and described diagnosis, artifacts, diagnostic confidence image quality, and comparison of imaging time. STATISTICAL TESTS: Pivot tables with diagnostic performance calculated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and the area under curve (AUC). Disease categorization and image quality measures were evaluated. The study protocol is published at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03338270. RESULTS: After exclusion of 21 patients, 82 patients had a routine clinical MRI with comparable contrasts to EPIMix and were evaluated. The diagnostic performance to categorize a full brain MRI investigation as abnormal or normal was comparable between EPIMix (AUC 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-1.00) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-1.00)) and routine clinical MRI (n = 82). Sensitivity was 95% (95% CI 88-95) and 93% (95% CI 86-98), and specificity 100% (95% CI 97-100) and 100% (95% CI 90-100). Disease categorization was congruent between EPIMix and clinical routine MRI in 90% (reader 2) and 93% (reader 1). Image quality was generally rated lower for EPIMix (P < 0.001). Imaging time was 78 seconds for EPIMix and for the same contrasts 12 minutes 29 seconds for conventional 3T MRI. DATA CONCLUSION: EPIMix has comparable diagnostic performance (disease identification and categorization) for most patients investigated in clinical routine. Level of Evidence 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1824-1833.
Subject(s)
Brain Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Contrast Media , Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Echo-Planar Imaging/methods , Image Enhancement/methods , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , TimeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although widely regarded as rare epithelial tumors with a low grade of malignancy, endolymphatic sac tumors (ELST) often lead to disabling petrous bone destruction and significantly impairing symptoms at the time of primary diagnosis and/or recurrence. ELST is not uncommon in von Hippel Lindau (VHL) patients. Although open surgery is regarded as the best treatment option, recurrence remains a challenge, particularly when gross tumor resection (GTR) is deemed unachievable due to topographic conditions. Tumor recurrence successfully treated with fractionated radiotherapy and radiosurgery have been reported in selected cases. We present the case of a patient with recurrent ELST treated with salvage gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) adding a review of current literature. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 65-year-old patient underwent GKRS of an unresectable, recurrent ELST. Tumor volumetric analysis showed almost 15% increase in tumor volume in the 4 months between the pre-GKRS magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the stereotactic MRI (s-MRI) at treatment. Follow-up MRI at 12 and 20 months showed significant decrease in local tumor volume, decreased contrast enhancement and no perifocal edema. The patient's general and neurological status remains stable to the present day. CONCLUSION: In the present case, GKRS was effective in the management of a recurrent ELST over the course of 20 months. Because of ELSTs recurrence potential, long-term follow up is required. The present case as well as previous reports might suggest a possible salvage/adjunctive role of radiosurgery in the management of ELST. Further studies are deemed necessary.
