Days spent on non-invasive ventilation support: can it determine when to initiate VV- ECMO? Observational study in a cohort of Covid-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: The study evaluates the impact of the time between commencing non-invasive ventilation (NIV) support and initiation of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) in a cohort of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: Prospective observational study design in an intensive Care Unit (ICU) of a tertiary hospital in Barcelona (Spain). All patients requiring VV-ECMO support due to COVID-19 associated ARDS between March 2020 and January 2022 were analysed. Survival outcome was determined at 90 days after VV-ECMO initiation. Demographic data, comorbidities at ICU admission, RESP (respiratory ECMO survival prediction) score, antiviral and immunomodulatory treatments received, inflammatory biomarkers, the need for vasopressors, the thromboprophylaxis regimen received, and respiratory parameters including the length of intubation previous to ECMO and the length of each NIV support (high-flow nasal cannula, continuous positive airway pressure and bi-level positive airway pressure), were also collated in order to assess risk factors for day-90 mortality. The effect of the time lapse between NIV support and VV-ECMO on survival was evaluated using logistic regression and adjusting the association with all factors that were significant in the univariate analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients finally received VV-ECMO support. At 90 days after commencing VV-ECMO 35 patients (48%) had died and 37 patients (52%) were alive. Multivariable analysis showed that at VV-ECMO initiation, age (p = 0.02), lactate (p = 0.001), and days from initiation of NIV support to starting VV-ECMO (p = 0.04) were all associated with day-90 mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In our small cohort of VV-ECMO patients with COVID-19 associated ARDS, the time spent between initiation of NIV support and VV-ECMO (together with age and lactate) appeared to be a better predictor of mortality than the time between intubation and VV-ECMO.

No impact of surviving sepsis campaign care bundles in reducing sepsis-associated acute kidney injury
.

BACKGROUND: The impact of Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) care bundles in reducing sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) was evaluated. METHODS: We conducted an observational single-center cohort study. Accomplishment of SSC care bundles was registered in all patients with severe sepsis admitted to the critical care department of a university hospital during three different periods. The main outcome measured was SA-AKI incidence defined as any worsening of AKI stage within the first 7 days from onset of sepsis. RESULTS: Among 260 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock finally meeting inclusion criteria, 82 (31.5%) patients developed SA-AKI. None of the SSC care tasks significantly decreased SA-AKI incidence, although a trend was observed with an initial better blood glucose control as well as with a more protective ventilation strategy. Hypotension requiring fluid challenge (hazard ratio (HR), 2.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2 - 4.2) and the presence of an abdominal sepsis etiology (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1 - 3.1) were independently associated with SA-AKI. Patients who developed SA-AKI had a higher 90-day mortality rate (62.2 vs. 40.4%). CONCLUSION: In a cohort of septic patients, none of the SSC care tasks significantly decreased SA-AKI incidence within the first week after onset of sepsis.
.

Clinical variables associated with poor outcome from sepsis-associated acute kidney injury and the relationship with timing of initiation of renal replacement therapy.

PURPOSE: Identify clinical variables associated with mortality in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and examine timing of initiation of CRRT in reference to those variables identified. METHODS: Retrospective study conducted at two tertiary care hospitals including 939 septic shock patients with SA-AKI who received CRRT in the intensive care unit (ICU). Cox regression models were used to identify variables associated with 90-day mortality. Timing of CRRT initiation was assessed in relationship to significant clinical variables identified. RESULTS: Overall 90-day mortality was 62.9%. Variables prior to CRRT associated with 90-day mortality included: age (aHR, 1.02; 95%CI, 1.01-1.02, p<000.1), APS-III score (1.01, 1.0-1.0, p<0.048), days from hospital admission to CRRT initiation (1.01, 1.0-1.0, p<0.01), blood urea nitrogen (1.01, 1.0-1.0, p<0.04), medical admission (1.76, 1.5-2.1, p<0.0001), creatinine (0.99, 0.9-1.0, p<0.001), and urine output (0.77, 0.6-0.9, p=0.049). In patients with advanced SA-AKI at ICU admission receiving CRRT within the first 5days (n=433), urine output during the 24h prior to CRRT initiation was a strong predictor of survival (2.6, 1.6-4.3, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SA-AKI, survival is lower when CRRT is started in the setting of low urine output.

Measurement of meropenem concentration in different human biological fluids by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Meropenem is a broad-spectrum antibiotic, often used for the empirical treatment of infections in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Meropenem has clinically insignificant protein binding and, as a carbapenem antibiotic, shows time-dependent bacterial killing, meaning that the unbound or free antibiotic concentration in blood should be maintained above the minimal inhibitory concentration of the pathogen for at least 40 % of the dosing interval. We developed and validated simple chromatographic methods by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to measure plasma, filtrate-dialysate, and urine concentrations of meropenem. Chromatographic separation was achieved using an Acquity(®) UPLC(®) BEH(TM) (2.1 × 100 mm id, 1.7 µm) reverse-phase C(18) column, with a water/acetonitrile linear gradient containing 0.1 % formic acid at a 0.4-mL/min flow rate. Meropenem and its internal standard (ertapenem) were detected by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry in positive ion multiple reaction monitoring mode. The limits of quantification were 0.27, 0.24, and 1.22 mg/L, and linearity was observed between 0.27-150, 0.24-150, and 1.22-2,000 mg/L for plasma, filtrate-dialysate, and urine samples, respectively. Coefficients of variation and relative biases were less than 13.5 and 8.0 % for all biological fluids. Recovery values were greater than 68.3 %. Evaluation of the matrix effect showed ion suppression for meropenem and ertapenem. No carry-over was observed. The validated methods are useful for both therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies. It could be applied to daily clinical laboratory practice to measure the concentration of meropenem in plasma, filtrate-dialysate, and urine.