ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the glycemic level patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with and without Metabolic syndrome (MS). METHODOLOGY: cross sectional study. Included patients randomly DM2 corroborated in your clinical record. The SM was identified in patients with at least 3 of 5 criteria of ATP III (Adult Treatment Panel III). A questionnaire was structured. Hemoglobin was determined (HbA1c), HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, hypertension (HBP), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and hip (NCC). RESULTS: 283 patients were included. Mean age was 59.8 ± 10.6. The predominant sex was female (73.6%). SM Criteria were : low HDL: 62.9%; hypertriglyceridemia: 56.3%; obesity abdominal (OA) 90.1%, hypertension (HBP): 62.5%. The prevalence of MS was 86.6% (95% CI 83% to 89%). There was significant difference in mean HbA1c level in patients with and without MS, HAS, OR, and low HDL. In contrast, subjects with hypertriglyceridemia had an HbA1c level significantly higher than those without hypertriglyceridemia (8.9% 2.3 vs 8.5% 2.1, respectively, P = 0.01). HbA1c is positively correlated with triglycerides (r = 0.24, p = 0.001), and negatively with weight (r = -0.19, p = 0.001), BMI (r = -0172, p = 0.004), CCI (r = -0.12, P = 0.004) and CCA (r = -0.14, p = 0.02). In adjusted multivariate analysis, only the duration of diabetes was associated with glycemic level (OR = 1.014, 95% in 1.010 to 1.016). CONCLUSIONS: We not found differences significant glycemic level in patients with and without MS.
Objetivo: Comparar el nivel glucémico en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 (DM2) con y sin síndrome metabólico (SM). Metodología: Estudio transversal analítico. Se incluyeron aleatoriamente pacientes con DM2 corroborado en su expediente clínico. El SM se identificó en pacientes con al menos 3 de 5 criterios del ATP III (AdultTreatment Panel III). Se aplicó un cuestionario estructurado. Se determinó hemoglobina glucosilada (HbA1c), colesterol-HDL, triglicéridos, hipertensión arterial sistémica (HAS), índice de masa corporal (IMC), circunferencia de cintura (CCi) y cadera (CCa). Plan de análisis: prevalencia, prueba t de Student, correlación de Pearson y regresión logística. Resultados: Se incluyeron 283 pacientes. Edad promedio: 59.8±10.6 años. Predominó el sexo femenino (73.6%)Criterios cubiertos para SM: hipocolesterolemia-HDL: 62.9%; hipertrigliceridemia: 56.3%; obesidad abdominal (OA) 90.1%; hipertensión arterial sistémica (HAS): 62.5%. La prevalencia de SM fue 86.6% (IC95% 83% a 89%). No hubo diferencia significativa en el promedio de HbA1c en pacientes con y sin SM, HAS, OA, e hipocolesterolemia-HDL. En cambio, sujetos con hipertrigliceridemia tuvieron un promedio significativamente mayor de HbA1c que aquellos sin hipertrigliceridemia (8.9±2.3 vs 8.5±2.1, respectivamente; p=0.01). HbA1c correlacionó positivamente con trigliceridemia (r=0.24, p=0.001), y negativamente con el peso (r= -0.19, p=0.001), IMC (r= -0.172, p=0.004), CCi (r= -0.12, p=0.004) y CCa (r=-0.14, p=0.02). En el análisis multivariado ajustado, solamente la duración de la diabetes se asoció con el nivel glucémico (OR= 1.014, IC95% 1.010 a 1.016). Conclusiones: No encontramos diferencias significativas en el nivel glucémico en pacientes con y sin SM.
Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Metabolic Syndrome/blood , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Metabolic Syndrome/complications , Mexico , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Sex Factors , Waist Circumference/physiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the glycemic level patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with and without Metabolic syndrome (MS). METHODOLOGY: cross sectional study. Included patients randomly DM2 corroborated in your clinical record. The SM was identified in patients with at least 3 of 5 criteria of ATP III (Adult Treatment Panel III). A questionnaire was structured. Hemoglobin was determined (HbA1c), HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, hypertension (HBP), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and hip (NCC). RESULTS: 283 patients were included. Mean age was 59.8 ± 10.6. The predominant sex was female (73.6
. The prevalence of MS was 86.6
). There was significant difference in mean HbA1c level in patients with and without MS, HAS, OR, and low HDL. In contrast, subjects with hypertriglyceridemia had an HbA1c level significantly higher than those without hypertriglyceridemia (8.9
2.1, respectively, P = 0.01). HbA1c is positively correlated with triglycerides (r = 0.24, p = 0.001), and negatively with weight (r = -0.19, p = 0.001), BMI (r = -0172, p = 0.004), CCI (r = -0.12, P = 0.004) and CCA (r = -0.14, p = 0.02). In adjusted multivariate analysis, only the duration of diabetes was associated with glycemic level (OR = 1.014, 95
in 1.010 to 1.016). CONCLUSIONS: We not found differences significant glycemic level in patients with and without MS.
Subject(s)
/blood , Blood Glucose/analysis , Metabolic Syndrome/blood , Analysis of Variance , Waist Circumference/physiology , /complications , Cross-Sectional Studies , Sex Factors , Female , Humans , Aged , Male , Mexico , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Metabolic Syndrome/complicationsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the glycemic level patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with and without Metabolic syndrome (MS). METHODOLOGY: cross sectional study. Included patients randomly DM2 corroborated in your clinical record. The SM was identified in patients with at least 3 of 5 criteria of ATP III (Adult Treatment Panel III). A questionnaire was structured. Hemoglobin was determined (HbA1c), HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, hypertension (HBP), body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and hip (NCC). RESULTS: 283 patients were included. Mean age was 59.8 ± 10.6. The predominant sex was female (73.6
). SM Criteria were : low HDL: 62.9
; hypertriglyceridemia: 56.3
; obesity abdominal (OA) 90.1
, hypertension (HBP): 62.5
. The prevalence of MS was 86.6
(95
CI 83
to 89
). There was significant difference in mean HbA1c level in patients with and without MS, HAS, OR, and low HDL. In contrast, subjects with hypertriglyceridemia had an HbA1c level significantly higher than those without hypertriglyceridemia (8.9
2.3 vs 8.5
2.1, respectively, P = 0.01). HbA1c is positively correlated with triglycerides (r = 0.24, p = 0.001), and negatively with weight (r = -0.19, p = 0.001), BMI (r = -0172, p = 0.004), CCI (r = -0.12, P = 0.004) and CCA (r = -0.14, p = 0.02). In adjusted multivariate analysis, only the duration of diabetes was associated with glycemic level (OR = 1.014, 95
in 1.010 to 1.016). CONCLUSIONS: We not found differences significant glycemic level in patients with and without MS.
