ABSTRACT
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of a cashew nut shell oil and commercial castor oil blend (CNSL-Castor oil) on the performance and microbiota of broiler chickens with and without coccidiosis challenge. A total of 864 one-day-old male chicks (Cobb) were randomly distributed to receive 6 treatments (8 pens/treatment; 18 chicks/pen) in a 3 × 2 factorial, with 3 additives (control [non-additives], 100 ppm sodium monensin, or 0.15% CNSL-Castor oil blend), and 2 levels of coccidiosis challenge at 14 D of age (unchallenged or inoculated by gavage with 1 mL of solution containing oocysts sporulated with Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima). No differences in productive performance were observed among treatments in the pre-challenge period and in unchallenged birds (P > 0.05). Seven-days post-challenge, birds receiving monensin performed better than birds in the positive control group (non-additive and challenge) or in the CNSL-Castor oil group (P > 0.05). However, 14 D post-challenge, birds supplemented with CNSL-Castor oil presented higher weight gain and better feed conversion (P > 0.05), without any change in feed intake (P > 0.05). During the accumulated period (1 to 42 D of age), the live weight, weight gain, and feed intake did not differ between the CNSL-Castor oil and monensin groups, both of which presented higher values than the positive control. Lactobacillus spp. and Clostridium perfringens numbers were increased in the challenged birds (P < 0.05). CNSL-Castor oil supplementation reduced Clostridium cluster XIV, C. perfringens, and S. aureus, compared with the monensin and control groups (P > 0.05). In addition, the CNSL-Castor oil group presented the highest number of Lactobacillus spp. copies, followed by the monensin and positive control groups (P > 0.05). Thus, monensin and CNSL-Castor oil effectively minimized the impact of coccidiosis at different times. While monensin acts as an antimicrobial, CNSL-Castor oil modulates the intestinal microbiota with antimicrobial action against gram-positive bacteria, mainly C. perfringens and S. aureus.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Chickens/immunology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/drug effects , Monensin/pharmacology , Plant Oils/pharmacology , Anacardium/chemistry , Animal Feed/analysis , Animals , Anti-Infective Agents/classification , Castor Oil/pharmacology , Chickens/growth & development , Chickens/microbiology , Chickens/physiology , Coccidiosis/immunology , Coccidiosis/veterinary , Diet/veterinary , Dietary Supplements/analysis , Eimeria/physiology , Male , Poultry Diseases/immunology , Random AllocationABSTRACT
The experiment was conducted to study the effect of pure glycerin supplementation (GLYC) in the drinking water of broilers subjected to heat stress and feed restriction. Water with 0, 1, or 2% glycerin was provided ad libitum to broilers in six hours of feed restriction. The birds were housed in two environments: thermoneutral (TN) - 25 ° C, and cyclic heat stress (HS) - 12h with 250C, 6h with 320C, 3h of 250 to 320C and 3h of 320 to 250C. The experimental design was randomized in a factorial arrangement of 2 x 3 + 2, with three GLYC levels, two environments and one control group with ad libitum feeding each environment. When submitted to HS, broiler receiving 2% glycerin presented higher weight gain (WG), water consumption (WC), feed intake (FI) and energy consumption (EI) than those in the other treatments, contrarily to birds in TN, where increasing GLYC levels decreased those responses. Broilers submitted to feed restriction presented reduced FI, but better feed conversion (FCR), independently of rearing environment or GLYC levels. Broilers under HS submitted to feed restriction and receiving 2% GLYC presented higher WC (p < 0.05) and similar WG as the controls, differently from the restricted-fed broilers under TN receiving 2% GLYC, which WC and WG were lower than the controls. The inclusion of 2% pure glycerin in the drinking water may compensate the negative effects on performance caused by feed restriction in broilers submitted to heat stress.(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Glycerol/analysis , Chickens/growth & development , Caloric Restriction/veterinary , Heat Stress Disorders/veterinary , Drinking , Food Additives/analysis , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Weight Gain , Eating , Drinking Water/analysisABSTRACT
The experiment was conducted to study the effect of pure glycerin supplementation (GLYC) in the drinking water of broilers subjected to heat stress and feed restriction. Water with 0, 1, or 2% glycerin was provided ad libitum to broilers in six hours of feed restriction. The birds were housed in two environments: thermoneutral (TN) - 25 ° C, and cyclic heat stress (HS) - 12h with 250C, 6h with 320C, 3h of 250 to 320C and 3h of 320 to 250C. The experimental design was randomized in a factorial arrangement of 2 x 3 + 2, with three GLYC levels, two environments and one control group with ad libitum feeding each environment. When submitted to HS, broiler receiving 2% glycerin presented higher weight gain (WG), water consumption (WC), feed intake (FI) and energy consumption (EI) than those in the other treatments, contrarily to birds in TN, where increasing GLYC levels decreased those responses. Broilers submitted to feed restriction presented reduced FI, but better feed conversion (FCR), independently of rearing environment or GLYC levels. Broilers under HS submitted to feed restriction and receiving 2% GLYC presented higher WC (p < 0.05) and similar WG as the controls, differently from the restricted-fed broilers under TN receiving 2% GLYC, which WC and WG were lower than the controls. The inclusion of 2% pure glycerin in the drinking water may compensate the negative effects on performance caused by feed restriction in broilers submitted to heat stress.
Subject(s)
Animals , Chickens/growth & development , Glycerol/analysis , Drinking , Caloric Restriction/veterinary , Heat Stress Disorders/veterinary , Food Additives/analysis , Weight Gain , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Eating , Drinking Water/analysisABSTRACT
Um experimento foi realizado para avaliar o efeito da adição de extratos cítricos e ractopamina a dietas de suínos em terminação. Foram utilizados 108 suínos (54 machos e 54 fêmeas), homogêneos geneticamente e peso vivo médio inicial de 61 quilogramas. O delineamento experimental foi o inteiramente casualizado, bloqueado por sexo e com nove tratamentos: T1. controle (C) (0 ppm de ractopamina e 0 ppm de extratos cítricos), T2. C + 10 RAC (ractopamina, em ppm), T3. C + 20 RAC, T4. C + 250 EC (extratos cítricos, em ppm), T5. C+ 500 EC, T6. C + 250 EC + 10 RAC, T7. C + 250 EC + 20 RAC, T8. C+ 500 EC + 10 RAC e T9. C + 500 EC + 20 RAC. Foram utilizados dois sexos, com duas repetições e seis animais por unidade experimental. Foram avaliadas amostras do músculo Longissimus dorsi quanto à umidade, cinzas, proteínas, lipídios e perfil de ácidos graxos. Os teores de proteína para a inclusão de 20 ppm de RAC foram em média 5,5% superiores (P<0,05) aos dois níveis de EC na dieta. A umidade do músculo nas amostras dos animais que receberam 500 ppm de EC e 20 ppm de RAC foi 4,3% superior (P<0.05) ao controle e 500 ppm de extratos cítricos. Os teores do ácido linoléico da interação 500 ppm de EC e 10 ppm de RAC foi 18% superior (P<0,05) em relação à inclusão de 500 ppm de extratos cítricos. Os teores do ácido a-Linolênico do controle foi 33,5% superior (P<0,05) aos níveis de extratos cítricos, ractopamina e suas interações. A concentração do ácido araquidônico da interação 250 ppm de EC e 20 ppm de RAC foi 36% superior (P<0,05) aos teores de 20 ppm de ractopamina. Níveis mais altos de ractopamina às dietas influenciam os teores de proteína e umidade do músculo. Os extratos cítricos influenciam os teores do ácido graxo láurico. A adição de ractopamina altera o perfil de alguns ácidos graxos insaturados do músculo Longissimus dorsi.
This study was carried out to evaluate the effect of the addition of the citrus extracts and ractopamine in finishing pig diets. Hundred eight pigs were used (54 males and 54 females) in a completely randomized design, blocked by sex and distributed in nine treatments: T1. control (C) (0 ppm of the ractopamine e 0 ppm of the citrus extracts), T2. C + 10 RAC (ractopamine, ppm), T3. C + 20 RAC, T4. C + 250 EC (citrus extracts, ppm), T5. C+ 500 EC, T6. C + 250 EC + 10 RAC, T7. C+ 250 EC + 20 RAC, T8. C+ 500 EC + 10 RAC e T9. C+ 500 EC + 20 RAC. We used two sexes, with two replications and six animals per experimental unit. The levels of protein for the inclusion of 20 ppm of RAC were on average 5.5% higher (P <0.05) the two EC levels in the diet. The moisture in the muscle samples from the animals that received 500 ppm EC and 20 ppm RAC was 4.3% higher (P <0.05) the control and 500 ppm of citrus extracts. The levels of linoleic acid in the interaction of 500 ppm EC and 10 ppm RAC was 18% higher (P <0.05) compared to the inclusion of 500 ppm of citrus extracts. The levels of a-linolenic acid of the control was 33.5% higher (P <0.05) of citrus extracts levels, ractopamine and their interactions. The concentration of arachidonic acid from the interaction of EC 250 ppm and 20 ppm RAC was 36% higher (P <0.05) to levels of 20 ppm of ractopamine. Higher levels of ractopamine in the diet influence the levels of protein and moisture of the muscle. Citrus extracts influence the levels of the fatty acid lauric acid. The addition of ractopamine change the profile of some unsaturated fatty acids of the Longissimus dorsi.