Social value of a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in Spain: the point of view of oncologists

PURPOSE: The economic situation showed that the resources devoted to health spending are limited, making rationalisation of their consumption necessary. The relevance of pharmacoeconomic analyses is becoming crucial. The ECO Foundation, promoting the quality of oncology care, set out to analyse the consensus on the new therapeutic targets inclusion and the integration of pharmacoeconomics when evaluating their effectiveness. METHODS: Study about pharmacoeconomic estimations was performed during the first ECO-Seminar (2010). It was developed using a modified Delphi method, in four stages: (1) committee coordinator establishment, (2) expert-panel selection, (3) preparation and submission of survey (1 question) by email, and (4) analysis of the degree of consensus reached. RESULTS: Results were obtained from surveys completed by 35 experts. Regarding the tolerable annual cost for the approval of new drugs, 68.8 % of the respondents considered a cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained between 30,000 and 100,000 acceptable (34.4 % 30,000-60,000; 34.4 % 60,000-100,000), 21.9 % of the respondents found costs between 100,000-150,000/QALY and 9.3 % of the respondents found costs above 150,000/QALY acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The costs of new drugs are higher than traditional treatments, making it a priority to identify subgroups of patients with specific molecular profiles as candidates for higher-efficiency-targeted therapies. The allocation of the available resources to the most effective interventions, to achieve the best clinical outcomes with lower costs and best subjective profile possible, allows expenditure to be rationalised. Pharmacoeconomic studies are a basic tool for obtaining better health outcomes according to the available resources, while also considering the other needs of the population (AU)

No disponible

Social value of a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in Spain: the point of view of oncologists.

PURPOSE: The economic situation showed that the resources devoted to health spending are limited, making rationalisation of their consumption necessary. The relevance of pharmacoeconomic analyses is becoming crucial. The ECO Foundation, promoting the quality of oncology care, set out to analyse the consensus on the new therapeutic targets inclusion and the integration of pharmacoeconomics when evaluating their effectiveness. METHODS: Study about pharmacoeconomic estimations was performed during the first ECO-Seminar (2010). It was developed using a modified Delphi method, in four stages: (1) committee coordinator establishment, (2) expert-panel selection, (3) preparation and submission of survey (1 question) by email, and (4) analysis of the degree of consensus reached. RESULTS: Results were obtained from surveys completed by 35 experts. Regarding the tolerable annual cost for the approval of new drugs, 68.8 % of the respondents considered a cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained between €30,000 and 100,000 acceptable (34.4 % €30,000-60,000; 34.4 % €60,000-100,000), 21.9 % of the respondents found costs between €100,000-150,000/QALY and 9.3 % of the respondents found costs above €150,000/QALY acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The costs of new drugs are higher than traditional treatments, making it a priority to identify subgroups of patients with specific molecular profiles as candidates for higher-efficiency-targeted therapies. The allocation of the available resources to the most effective interventions, to achieve the best clinical outcomes with lower costs and best subjective profile possible, allows expenditure to be rationalised. Pharmacoeconomic studies are a basic tool for obtaining better health outcomes according to the available resources, while also considering the other needs of the population.

Management of malignant insulinoma

AIM: Malignant insulinoma is an infrequent functional endocrine tumor of the pancreas. Adequate therapy is a demanding challenge for oncologists and endocrinologists. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of multidisciplinary management of malignant insulinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with malignant insulinoma treated from 1995 to 2011. RESULTS: Seven patients with malignant insulinoma were included: four males and three females; median age was 61.8 years (range 37-78). Six tumors were sporadic and one was diagnosed in a patient with a type 1 multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN-1). Surgery was performed in six cases and one patient was considered unresectable. Hypoglycemias persisted in all cases and somatostatin analogs, glucocorticoids and diazoxide were used. Two patients received everolimus. Other techniques were chemoembolization and internal radiation therapy with yttrium-90. Successful liver transplant was done in the patient with MEN-1. CONCLUSION: hypoglycemia management is complex and requires multiple therapies. Further evaluations will be necessary to determine the best treatment (AU)

Management of malignant insulinoma.

AIM: Malignant insulinoma is an infrequent functional endocrine tumor of the pancreas. Adequate therapy is a demanding challenge for oncologists and endocrinologists. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of multidisciplinary management of malignant insulinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with malignant insulinoma treated from 1995 to 2011. RESULTS: Seven patients with malignant insulinoma were included: four males and three females; median age was 61.8 years (range 37-78). Six tumors were sporadic and one was diagnosed in a patient with a type 1 multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN-1). Surgery was performed in six cases and one patient was considered unresectable. Hypoglycemias persisted in all cases and somatostatin analogs, glucocorticoids and diazoxide were used. Two patients received everolimus. Other techniques were chemoembolization and internal radiation therapy with yttrium-90. Successful liver transplant was done in the patient with MEN-1. CONCLUSION: Hypoglycemia management is complex and requires multiple therapies. Further evaluations will be necessary to determine the best treatment.

[Pharmacoeconomics and cost of cancer drugs]. / Farmacoeconomía y los costes de los medicamentos contra el cáncer.

Cancer is a disease of high incidence, which determines that the health systems will be forced to allocation a significant amount of resources. In an era of evidence-based medicine and increasing cost pressures, it is important to understand the relative clinical and economic impact of the many drug treatment strategies available for cancer patients. Currently, resources that may be spent in pharmacoeconomics expenditure are limited so it is necessary to rationalize their consumption and priorize in the allocation of these resources to the options with higher economic advantages. Pharmacoeconomic studies will permit us to know what is the efficiency of different therapeutic alternatives so they will help to determine the therapeutic options that we should use in routine medical practice.

Farmacoeconomía y los costes de los medicamentos contra el cáncer / Pharmacoeconomics and cost of cancer drugs

El cáncer es una enfermedad de elevada incidencia, lo que condiciona que los sistemas de salud se vean obligados a destinarle un importante volumen de recursos. En la era de la medicina basada en la evidencia, y de las presiones de un gasto sanitario en aumento, es necesario comprender el impacto clínico y económico de las diferentes estrategias disponibles para los pacientes oncológicos. En la actualidad, los recursos que pueden ser destinados al gasto farmacéutico son limitados, por lo que es necesario racionalizar su consumo y priorizar en la asignación de estos recursos a las opciones que presenten mayores ventajas económicas. Los estudios de farmacoeconomía nos van a permitir conocer cuál es la eficiencia de las diferentes alternativas terapéuticas disponibles y, por lo tanto, nos ayudarán a determinar qué opciones terapéuticas deberían emplearse de forma rutinaria (AU)

Cancer is a disease of high incidence, which determines that the health systems will be forced to allocation a significant amount of resources. In an era of evidence-based medicine and increasing cost pressures, it is important to understand the relative clinical and economic impact of the many drug treatment strategies available for cancer patients. Currently, resources that may be spent in pharmacoeconomics expenditure are limited so it is necessary to rationalize their consumption and priorize in the allocation of these resources to the options with higher economic advantages. Pharmacoeconomic studies will permit us to know what is the efficiency of different therapeutic alternatives so they will help to determine the therapeutic options that we should use in routine medical practice (AU)