Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Chemosphere ; 286(Pt 1): 131545, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34293563

ABSTRACT

Several studies have reported exposure of humans to various endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) worldwide. However, there is a lack of data regarding EDC exposures in humans living in Southeast Asian countries, such as the Philippines. Hence, this study measured levels of 41 EDCs in women residing in the Greater Manila Area, home to the second largest city in Southeast Asia. Urine samples from women with versus without breast cancer were analyzed for 11 phthalate metabolites, 8 environmental phenols, and 10 bisphenols, while serum samples were analyzed for 12 perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Out of the four groups of EDCs analyzed, PFAS were significantly associated with breast cancer (adjusted OR = 13.63, 95% CI: 3.24-94.88 p-trend = 0.001 for PFDoA; adjusted OR = 9.26, 95% CI 2.54-45.10, p-trend = 0.002 for PFDA; and adjusted OR = 2.66, 95% CI: 0.95-7.66, p-trend = 0.004 for PFHxA). Long-chain PFAS levels were positively correlated with age and were significantly higher in women from Region IV-A, a heavily industrialized region, than from the National Capital Region. Overall, this study showed baseline information regarding the level of EDCs in Filipinas, providing a glimpse of EDC exposure in women living in a megalopolis city in Southeast Asia.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Endocrine Disruptors , Environmental Pollutants , Fluorocarbons , Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Philippines
2.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 80: 105653, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33611079

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: We documented the initial experience in our institution where we used indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography as adjunct in the evaluation of the vascular supply of a reconstructed gastric conduit for esophageal replacement for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 62-year-old patient consulted with a two-month history of melena and weight loss and unremarkable chest and abdominal physical examinations. CLINICAL FINDINGS AND INVESTIGATIONS: Upper endoscopy and contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans of the chest and abdomen demonstrated an EGJ tumor with no nodal and distant metastases, which revealed adenocarcinoma on biopsy. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: The patient underwent combined thoracoscopic-assisted and transhiatal thoracic esophagectomy with proximal gastrectomy. Esophageal reconstruction was done via a retrosternal gastric pull-up. The perfusion and viability of the gastric conduit were confirmed as per usual methods of inspection and palpation. ICG fluorescence angiography further demonstrated and confirmed the vascular perfusion of the gastric conduit and the optimal site of anastomosis. The patient had an unremarkable postoperative course with no reported anastomotic leakage and stricture formation at 12 months follow-up. RELEVANCE AND IMPACT: ICG fluorescence angiography represents a feasible and promising tool in assessing viability of esophageal replacement and choosing the optimal site for anastomosis with the proximal esophagus. It can aid in choosing the most appropriate site of anastomosis to prevent ischemia-related complications such as leakage or stricture. This particular case can serve as an initial learning experience to guide surgeons in our institution in the use of ICG fluorescence angiography for esophageal replacements after esophagectomy.

3.
World J Surg ; 37(1): 59-66, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23052809

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) following specific types of breast cancer surgery remains uncertain. This study assessed the effectiveness of prophylaxis in modified radical mastectomy (MRM). METHODS: Women undergoing MRM for breast cancer were recruited. Women were excluded who had diabetes mellitus, severe malnutrition or known allergy to cephalosporins; were receiving corticosteroid therapy or were treated with antibiotics within one week prior to surgery; were scheduled for simultaneous breast reconstruction or bilateral oophorectomy; had existing local infection. Participants were randomized to receive either intravenous cefazolin 1 g or placebo within 30 min prior to skin incision. Standard skin preparation and operative technique for MRM were carried out. Wounds were assessed for SSI and other complications weekly for 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 254 women were recruited. Age, clinical stage, prior chemotherapy, and operative time were similar for antibiotic and placebo groups. The overall incidence of SSI was 14.2 %. There were no significant differences in the infection rate over the 30-day follow-up period between the placebo and antibiotic groups (15 % vs 13.4 %; p = 0.719) or at each week. The majority of SSI were either cellulitis or superficial infection for both groups. There were no significant differences between groups in treatments required for SSI, incidence of hematoma or seroma. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study, alone and when meta-analyzed with data from studies in similar surgical populations, do not support the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in MRM.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Mastectomy, Modified Radical , Preoperative Care , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Middle Aged
4.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-732170

ABSTRACT

The clinical area identified by the Philippine College of Surgeons (PCS) for the third evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (EBCPGs) was on the management of breast cancer. Funding for the research project was provided by the Philippine Council for Health Research and Development (PCHRD), and a Technical Working Group (TWG) was formed, composed of 5 general surgeons and 1 medical oncologist. The TWG was tasked to identify the clinical questions and to adhere to the PCS approved method of developing EBCPGs. The TWG decided to divide the report into two parts: Early Breast Cancer, and Locally Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer. This first report will focus on Early Breast Cancer The definition of early breast cancer is that used by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group (EBCTG), since the regular systemic reviews (meta-analysis) of the group on the primary and adjuvant therapies of early breast cancer currently comprise the strongest evidence. "In women with "early breast cancer", all detectable cancer is, by definition, restricted to the breast and, in the case of node positive patients, the local lymph nodes can be removed surgically." The TWG began work on July 1, 2000. The literature search, limited to English publications, used both electronic and manual methods. Three electronic databases were used: 1) The Cochrane library, Issue 2, 2000; 2) National Library of Medicine-Medline (PubMed, no time limit); and HERDIN (Health Research and Development Information Network) Version 1, 1997 of DOST-PCHRD Titles of all articles were printed and at least 2 members of the TWG went over the list and checked the titles of articles whose abstract they felt should be read. The abstracts of all checked articles were printed. The printed abstracts were given to the members of the TWG, who then decided which articles were to be included for full text retrieval. The full texts were obtained from the University of the Philippines Manila Library, and were appraised using standard forms. The TWG then compiled, summarized and classified the evidence according to 3 levels and proposed a first draft to recommendations according to 3 categories.(Author)


Subject(s)
Humans , Breast , Breast Neoplasms , Surgeons , Lymph Nodes , Oncologists
5.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-732366

ABSTRACT

An open, prostective, randomized multicenter clinical trial randomly allocated successive patient who were scheduled for a surgical procedure for serious intra-abdominal infections to receive either treatment CM (ceftazidine plus metronidazole) or monotherapy with treatment IC (imipenem/cilastatin). Out of 90 eligible patients, 87 were clinically evaluable of which 71 were clinically and bacteriologically evaluable (CBE). Cases allocated to each treatment group were comparable as to age, sex, diagnostic group distribution, mean APACHE II scores, and bacteriologic evaluability. Among the 87 clinically evaluable patients, there were 4 (9.1%) and 2 (4.7%) treatment failures among those who received treatments CM and IC respectively (p=0.486). For all eligible patients, the mean fever days was 2.07, mean treatment days was 6.01, and mean hospital days was 11.57, and was not significantly different between the two treatment groups. Among clinically evaluable cases, the mean APACHE II scores of patients with succesful outcomes (5.8) was very significantly lower (p=0.000) than that of patients whose treatment failed (13.8). This was also true for CBE cases. Logistic regression analysis showed that among six variables (diagnostic group, APACHE II score, antibiotic used, fever days, hospital days and treatment days) only the APACHE II score signficantly contributed to treatment failure (p=0.001).


Subject(s)
Humans , Cilastatin , Imipenem , Metronidazole , Drug Combinations , Sex Distribution , Age Distribution , Intraabdominal Infections , Anti-Bacterial Agents
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...