Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nurse Pract ; 36(6): 22-8; quiz 28-9, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21558979

ABSTRACT

Many over-the-counter medications are available to help alleviate common discomforts experienced during pregnancy. Although many appear to be safe, healthcare providers must familiarize themselves with these medications.


Subject(s)
Nonprescription Drugs , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Analgesics/adverse effects , Anti-Allergic Agents/adverse effects , Common Cold/drug therapy , Female , Gastrointestinal Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Nonprescription Drugs/adverse effects , Pregnancy , Risk Factors
2.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 55(4): 308-18, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20630357

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Laboring women are often admitted to labor units under criteria that are commonly associated with the onset of active-phase labor (i.e., cervical dilatation of 3-5 cm in the presence of regular contractions). Beginning with these criteria through complete dilatation, this systematic review describes labor duration and cervical dilation rates among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset. METHODS: Studies published in English (between 1990 and 2008) were identified via MEDLINE and CINAHL searches. Data were abstracted and weighted "active labor" durations (i.e., from 3-5 cm through complete dilatation) and linear dilation rates were calculated. RESULTS: Eighteen studies (n = 7009) reported mean "active labor" duration. The weighted mean duration was 6.0 hours, and the calculated dilation rate was 1.2 cm per hour. These findings closely parallel those found at the median. At the statistical limits, the weighted "active labor" duration was 13.4 hours (mean + 2 standard deviations) and the dilation rate was 0.6 cm per hour (mean - 2 standard deviations). DISCUSSION: These findings indicate that nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset have longer "active" labors and therefore slower dilation rates than are traditionally associated with active labor when commonly used criteria are applied as the starting point. Revision of existing active labor expectations and/or criteria used to prospectively identify active phase onset is warranted.


Subject(s)
Labor Stage, First/physiology , Labor, Obstetric/physiology , Parity , Parturition/physiology , Cervix Uteri/physiology , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Uterine Contraction/physiology
3.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs ; 39(4): 361-9, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20629924

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To integrate research literature that has provided insights into the cervical dilation rate that may best describe the slowest-yet-normal dilation rate among nulliparous women when beginning with criteria commonly associated with active labor onset. DATA SOURCES: A literature search from 1950 through 2008 was conducted using the Medline electronic database, reference lists from identified articles, and other key references. STUDY SELECTION: Research reports written in English with a focus on the cervical dilation and/or labor duration of low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset. DATA EXTRACTION: Classic and contemporary research literature was reviewed and organized under the following subheadings: Friedman Studies, Partograph Studies, Active Management of Labor Studies, Additional Studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: An integrative review of the literature approximated the slowest-yet-normal cervical dilation rate for nulliparous women when beginning with criteria commonly associated with active labor. CONCLUSIONS: The slowest-yet-normal linear dilation rate approximates 0.5 cm/hour for low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset when starting at dilatations traditionally associated with active labor onset. However, this linear rate must be evaluated judiciously in light of the physiological acceleration of dilation that occurs during typical labor. Given this, cervical dilation for this population is likely slower than 0.5 cm/hour in earlier active labor and faster in more advanced active labor. Faster dilation expectations (e.g., 1 cm/hour) likely contribute to an overdiagnosis of dystocia ("slow, abnormal progression of labor") in contemporary practice and, subsequently, to an overuse of interventions aimed at accelerating labor progress.


Subject(s)
Cervix Uteri/physiology , Labor Stage, First/physiology , Parity , Pregnancy Outcome , Trial of Labor , Uterine Contraction/physiology , Dystocia/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Nursing Assessment , Nursing Methodology Research , Pregnancy , Reference Values
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...