ABSTRACT
The objective of this study is to present the protocol of a cluster randomized clinical trial to be conducted through the TeleICU project - Qualification of Intensive Care by Telemedicine. The study will consist of a cluster randomized clinical trial, open label, in pediatric intensive care units, with an allocation ratio of 1:1, to compare the intervention group (support of Telemedicine for patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit) with a control group (pediatric intensive care unit usual care). The study proposed to select 16 pediatric intensive care units, including 100 participants per site, with a total of 1,600 participants. The intervention group will receive telerounds from Monday to Friday and will have specialists and continuing education activities available. The primary outcome measure will be the length of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit, defined as the difference between the date of discharge of the participant and the date of admission to the intensive care unit. The secondary outcomes will be mortality rate, invasive mechanical ventilation-free days, days using antibiotics, days using vasoactive drugs and days using sedoanalgesia. This study will be conducted in accordance with Resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council, with approval by the Research Ethics Committee of the institutions involved. The present study has the potential to reproduce studies on Telemedicine in intensive care and may make important contributions to care in intensive care units in Brazil and other settings. If Telemedicine shows positive clinical care results compared to conventional treatment, more pediatric patients may benefit. ClinicalTrials.gov registry: NCT05260710.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicine , Humans , Child , SARS-CoV-2 , Hospitalization , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
ABSTRACT The objective of this study is to present the protocol of a cluster randomized clinical trial to be conducted through the TeleICU project - Qualification of Intensive Care by Telemedicine. The study will consist of a cluster randomized clinical trial, open label, in pediatric intensive care units, with an allocation ratio of 1:1, to compare the intervention group (support of Telemedicine for patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit) with a control group (pediatric intensive care unit usual care). The study proposed to select 16 pediatric intensive care units, including 100 participants per site, with a total of 1,600 participants. The intervention group will receive telerounds from Monday to Friday and will have specialists and continuing education activities available. The primary outcome measure will be the length of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit, defined as the difference between the date of discharge of the participant and the date of admission to the intensive care unit. The secondary outcomes will be mortality rate, invasive mechanical ventilation-free days, days using antibiotics, days using vasoactive drugs and days using sedoanalgesia. This study will be conducted in accordance with Resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council, with approval by the Research Ethics Committee of the institutions involved. The present study has the potential to reproduce studies on Telemedicine in intensive care and may make important contributions to care in intensive care units in Brazil and other settings. If Telemedicine shows positive clinical care results compared to conventional treatment, more pediatric patients may benefit. ClinicalTrials.gov registry: NCT05260710
RESUMO O objetivo deste estudo será apresentar o protocolo de um ensaio clínico randomizado em cluster a ser realizado por meio do projeto TeleUTI - Qualificação da Assistência em Terapia Intensiva por Telemedicina. O estudo consistirá em um ensaio clínico randomizado por cluster, open label, em unidades de terapia intensiva pediátricas, com proporção de alocação de 1:1, com o intuito de comparar o grupo de intervenção (apoio da telemedicina para os pacientes internados na unidade de terapia intensiva pediátrica) com um grupo controle (cuidados habituais da unidade de terapia intensiva pediátrica). O estudo se propõe a selecionar 16 unidades de terapia intensiva pediátricas, incluindo 100 participantes por local, com o total de 1.600 participantes. O grupo intervenção receberá telerounds de segunda-feira a sexta-feira e terá à disposição especialistas e atividades de educação continuada. O desfecho primário a ser avaliado será o tempo de permanência nas unidades de terapia intensiva pediátricas, definido pela diferença entre a data de alta do participante com a data de admissão na unidade de terapia intensiva. Os desfechos secundários serão: taxa de mortalidade; dias livres de ventilação mecânica, dias de uso de antibióticos, dias de uso de drogas vasoativas e dias de uso de sedoanalgesia. Este estudo será conduzido em conformidade com a resolução 466/12 do Conselho Nacional de Saúde, com aprovação pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa das instituições hospitalares envolvidas. O trabalho tem o potencial de reproduzir estudos sobre Telemedicina em cuidados intensivos, podendo trazer contribuições importantes ao atendimento em unidades de terapia intensiva no Brasil e em outras realidades. Se a Telemedicina mostrar resultados clínicos assistenciais positivos em relação ao tratamento convencional, mais pacientes pediátricos poderão ser beneficiados. Registro ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05260710
ABSTRACT
The use of teleophthalmology may be a viable strategy to track and to diagnose major eye diseases primary health care patients. This study aimed to describe the performance of 30,315 telediagnoses in ophthalmology in primary care patients and the case management of this service. This is a cross-sectional study to evaluate the telediagnosis performed in patients treated at the eight remote points of the TeleOftalmo project from January 2nd, 2018, to December 31st, 2020. The patients' demographic characteristics, the reasons for referral, the diagnoses made according to age group, and the case management of the telediagnosis were evaluated. Most patients were female (66.1%), adults (70.3%), and referred to telediagnosis mainly due to reduced visual acuity (60.5%). Refractive errors were the most prevalent diagnosis in all age groups. Presbyopia was the most prevalent eye disease in adults (65.4%) and older adults (64%), followed by cataracts (41.3%) and suspected glaucoma (10.6%) in older adults. In total, 30,315 patients underwent telediagnosis, 70.5% had their ocular complaints fully resolved, without the need for referral to an in-person ophthalmologist. Telemedicine can be resolutory for the most prevalent eye diseases in the population, increasing the supply of diagnoses, qualifying and assisting in reducing waiting lines for ophthalmologic care.
O uso da teleoftalmologia pode ser uma estratégia viável para rastrear e diagnosticar as principais doenças oculares em pacientes na atenção primária à saúde. O objetivo deste estudo é descrever a realização de 30.315 telediagnósticos em oftalmologia em pacientes da atenção primária e a resolutividade desse serviço. Estudo transversal para avaliar os telediagnósticos realizados em pacientes atendidos nos oito pontos remotos do projeto TeleOftalmo entre 2 de janeiro de 2018 a 31 de dezembro de 2020. Foram avaliadas as características demográficas dos pacientes, os motivos de encaminhamento, os diagnósticos realizados conforme faixa etária e a resolutividade do telediagnóstico. Os pacientes eram, na maioria, do sexo feminino (66,1%), adultos (70,3%) e encaminhados ao telediagnóstico principalmente devido à baixa acuidade visual (60,5%). Os erros refrativos foram o diagnóstico mais prevalente em todas as faixas etárias. A presbiopia foi a doença ocular mais prevalente em adultos (65,4%) e idosos (64%), seguida da catarata (41,3%) e suspeita de glaucoma (10,6%) em idosos. Dos 30.315 pacientes que realizaram o telediagnóstico, 70,5% tiveram suas queixas oculares totalmente solucionadas, sem a necessidade de encaminhamento ao oftalmologista presencial. A telemedicina pode ser resolutiva para as doenças oculares mais prevalentes na população, aumentando a oferta de diagnósticos, qualificando e auxiliando na redução das filas de espera por atendimento oftalmológico.
La teleoftalmología puede ser una estrategia viable para el tamizaje y diagnóstico de las principales enfermedades oculares en pacientes en la atención primaria de salud. El objetivo de este estudio es describir la realización de 30.315 telediagnósticos en oftalmología en pacientes de atención primaria y la resolución de este servicio. Estudio transversal para evaluar los telediagnósticos realizados a pacientes en los ocho puntos de atención remota del proyecto TeleOftalmo entre el 2 de enero de 2018 y el 31 de diciembre de 2020. Se evaluaron las características demográficas de los pacientes, los motivos de derivación, los diagnósticos realizados según el grupo de edad y la resolución de los telediagnósticos. Los pacientes eran en su mayoría mujeres (66,1%), adultos (70,3%) y remitidos para telediagnóstico, principalmente por baja agudeza visual (60,5%). Los errores de refracción fueron el diagnóstico más prevalente en todos los grupos de edad. La presbicia fue la enfermedad ocular más frecuente en adultos (65,4%) y ancianos (64%), seguida de catarata (41,3%) y sospecha de glaucoma (10,6%) en ancianos. De los 30.315 pacientes que realizaron el telediagnóstico, el 70,5% tuvo sus quejas oculares totalmente resueltas, sin necesidad de derivación presencial al oftalmólogo. La telemedicina puede ser una herramienta útil para detectar las enfermedades oculares más prevalentes en la población debido al aumento de los diagnósticos y la ayuda que produce al reducir la lista de espera para atención oftalmológica.
Subject(s)
Eye Diseases , Ophthalmology , Telemedicine , Aged , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Eye Diseases/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Primary Health CareABSTRACT
Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to the suspension or postponement of care for non-urgent conditions worldwide. Regula Mais Brasil is an initiative of the Unified Health System (SUS) in Brazil to optimize the management of referrals to specialized care by using telehealth. Objectives: To report the expansion of telehealth activities of Regula Mais Brasil in response to COVID-19 and to assess qualification of referrals in primary health care (PHC) units as well as the added value of teleconsultation in qualifying referral cases. Methods: Descriptive study of the teleconsultations carried out as an additional strategy to the remotely operated referral management system, responsible for navigating cases from PHC units to specialized care in Recife, Brazil, between May 6, 2020 and September 30, 2020. Teleconsultation was implemented as a tool for reducing delays in the access to health care due to COVID-19 and ultimately allowed for reclassification of the referral adequacy and priority. Changes in referral priority ratings and referral decisions after teleconsultation were analyzed. Results: A total of 622 referral cases were analyzed. Approved referrals represented 51.9% of cases. The main reason for approved referrals was the need for diagnostic resources. There was a reduction in priority ratings in 449 cases (72.2%) after teleconsultation. There was a statistically significant association between the change of priority ratings and the decision on referral (Pearson's χ2, p-value <0.0001). Results show that telemedicine had an impact on the prioritization and qualification of cases referred to specialized services. Conclusions: A need was detected to rapidly adapt tools available for telemedicine in Brazil. Our results demonstrate that teleconsultation as an additional strategy to the remotely operated referral management system has contributed toward improving equitable access to specialized services.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Remote Consultation , Telemedicine , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Primary Health CareABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Advances in telemedicine offer a unique opportunity to expand access to the health system. Nevertheless, few studies have described the impact of telediagnosis implementation on health and economic outcomes. METHODS: An ophthalmology telediagnosis service (TeleOftalmo) was compared with traditional face-to-face care provided by the Brazilian public health system. For both groups, utility data were collected at 2 time points using the Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index instrument from interviews with 536 patients. The cost per patient encounter was analyzed according to the time-driven activity-based costing. Value analyses were conducted to ascertain whether and how telemedicine service has the potential to generate cost savings for the health system. RESULTS: Visual function-related quality of life did not differ significantly between TeleOftalmo and face-to-face care groups. Using the current model, the telemedicine service assisted an average of 1159 patients per month at a median cost per telediagnosis of Int$97 (interquartile range, Int$82-Int$119) versus Int$77 (interquartile range, Int$75-Int$80) for face-to-face care. If the telemedicine service was redesigned, considering the opportunities for improvement identified, it could operate at a cost of Int$53 per telediagnosis (a 31% cost savings) and could serve 3882 patients per month. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the potential value of a telemedicine service. There was no difference in patient-perceived utility between a telediagnostic ophthalmology service and face-to-face care by an eye specialist. TeleOftalmo has the potential to be a cost-saving strategy for the Brazilian health system and could be a template for implementation of telediagnostic services in other regions.
Subject(s)
Ophthalmology , Telemedicine , Brazil , Cost Savings , Humans , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
O uso da teleoftalmologia pode ser uma estratégia viável para rastrear e diagnosticar as principais doenças oculares em pacientes na atenção primária à saúde. O objetivo deste estudo é descrever a realização de 30.315 telediagnósticos em oftalmologia em pacientes da atenção primária e a resolutividade desse serviço. Estudo transversal para avaliar os telediagnósticos realizados em pacientes atendidos nos oito pontos remotos do projeto TeleOftalmo entre 2 de janeiro de 2018 a 31 de dezembro de 2020. Foram avaliadas as características demográficas dos pacientes, os motivos de encaminhamento, os diagnósticos realizados conforme faixa etária e a resolutividade do telediagnóstico. Os pacientes eram, na maioria, do sexo feminino (66,1%), adultos (70,3%) e encaminhados ao telediagnóstico principalmente devido à baixa acuidade visual (60,5%). Os erros refrativos foram o diagnóstico mais prevalente em todas as faixas etárias. A presbiopia foi a doença ocular mais prevalente em adultos (65,4%) e idosos (64%), seguida da catarata (41,3%) e suspeita de glaucoma (10,6%) em idosos. Dos 30.315 pacientes que realizaram o telediagnóstico, 70,5% tiveram suas queixas oculares totalmente solucionadas, sem a necessidade de encaminhamento ao oftalmologista presencial. A telemedicina pode ser resolutiva para as doenças oculares mais prevalentes na população, aumentando a oferta de diagnósticos, qualificando e auxiliando na redução das filas de espera por atendimento oftalmológico.
The use of teleophthalmology may be a viable strategy to track and to diagnose major eye diseases primary health care patients. This study aimed to describe the performance of 30,315 telediagnoses in ophthalmology in primary care patients and the case management of this service. This is a cross-sectional study to evaluate the telediagnosis performed in patients treated at the eight remote points of the TeleOftalmo project from January 2nd, 2018, to December 31st, 2020. The patients' demographic characteristics, the reasons for referral, the diagnoses made according to age group, and the case management of the telediagnosis were evaluated. Most patients were female (66.1%), adults (70.3%), and referred to telediagnosis mainly due to reduced visual acuity (60.5%). Refractive errors were the most prevalent diagnosis in all age groups. Presbyopia was the most prevalent eye disease in adults (65.4%) and older adults (64%), followed by cataracts (41.3%) and suspected glaucoma (10.6%) in older adults. In total, 30,315 patients underwent telediagnosis, 70.5% had their ocular complaints fully resolved, without the need for referral to an in-person ophthalmologist. Telemedicine can be resolutory for the most prevalent eye diseases in the population, increasing the supply of diagnoses, qualifying and assisting in reducing waiting lines for ophthalmologic care.
La teleoftalmología puede ser una estrategia viable para el tamizaje y diagnóstico de las principales enfermedades oculares en pacientes en la atención primaria de salud. El objetivo de este estudio es describir la realización de 30.315 telediagnósticos en oftalmología en pacientes de atención primaria y la resolución de este servicio. Estudio transversal para evaluar los telediagnósticos realizados a pacientes en los ocho puntos de atención remota del proyecto TeleOftalmo entre el 2 de enero de 2018 y el 31 de diciembre de 2020. Se evaluaron las características demográficas de los pacientes, los motivos de derivación, los diagnósticos realizados según el grupo de edad y la resolución de los telediagnósticos. Los pacientes eran en su mayoría mujeres (66,1%), adultos (70,3%) y remitidos para telediagnóstico, principalmente por baja agudeza visual (60,5%). Los errores de refracción fueron el diagnóstico más prevalente en todos los grupos de edad. La presbicia fue la enfermedad ocular más frecuente en adultos (65,4%) y ancianos (64%), seguida de catarata (41,3%) y sospecha de glaucoma (10,6%) en ancianos. De los 30.315 pacientes que realizaron el telediagnóstico, el 70,5% tuvo sus quejas oculares totalmente resueltas, sin necesidad de derivación presencial al oftalmólogo. La telemedicina puede ser una herramienta útil para detectar las enfermedades oculares más prevalentes en la población debido al aumento de los diagnósticos y la ayuda que produce al reducir la lista de espera para atención oftalmológica.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Ophthalmology , Telemedicine , Eye Diseases/diagnosis , Primary Health Care , Brazil , Cross-Sectional StudiesABSTRACT
Telemedicine can be used to conduct ophthalmological assessment of patients, facilitating patient access to specialist care. Since the teleophthalmology models require data collection support from other health professionals, the purpose of our study was to assess agreement between the nursing technician and the ophthalmologist in acquisition of health parameters that can be used for remote analysis as part of a telemedicine strategy. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 140 patients referred to an ophthalmological telediagnosis center by primary healthcare doctors. The health parameters evaluated were visual acuity (VA), objective ophthalmic measures acquired by autorefraction, keratometry, and intraocular pressure (IOP). Bland-Altman plots were used to analyze agreement between the nursing technician and the ophthalmologist. The Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias equal to zero for the VA measurements [95%-LoA: -0.25-0.25], 0.01 [95%-LoA: -0.86-0.88] for spherical equivalent (M), -0.08 [95%-LoA: -1.1-0.95] for keratometry (K) and -0.23 [95%-LoA: -4.4-4.00] for IOP. The measures had a high linear correlation (R [95%CI]: 0.87 [0.82-0.91]; 0.97 [0.96-0.98]; 0.96 [0.95-0.97] and 0.88 [0.84-0.91] respectively). The results observed demonstrate that remote ophthalmological data collection by adequately trained health professionals is viable. This confirms the utility and safety of these solutions for scenarios in which access to ophthalmologists is limited.
Subject(s)
Eye Diseases/diagnosis , Intraocular Pressure , Nursing Staff , Ophthalmologists , Telemedicine , Tonometry, Ocular , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ophthalmology , Primary Health CareABSTRACT
Purpose of Review: To present the implementation of a telemedicine project (TeleICU) in pediatric intensive care units (ICU) throughout different Brazilian regions. Recent Findings: Although telemedicine in pediatric ICUs has shown evidence of benefit in numerous studies with potential to 18 mitigate existing disparities, in Brazil, its use is still under development. Brazil has several opportunities for implementing this resource since, according to the National Registry of Healthcare 20 Establishments (NRHE), there is a discrepancy in the density of pediatric intensive care physicians per patient and the availability 21 of pediatric ICU beds per number of inhabitants. Summary: Health technologies are being widely used to fill gaps in the healthcare system. Telemedicine has been an important tool to meet demands in intensive care units, especially the demand for specialized assistance. TeleICU is a Brazilian model of telemedicine that performs multidisciplinary telerounds in remote pediatric ICUs and develops continuing education activities for the healthcare teams. The project aims to systematize and to qualify care, as well as to reduce risks for patients admitted to pediatric ICUs engaged in the project. Preliminary results have demonstrated a positive impact regarding this approach, providing medical care to 6640 inpatients-day in two Brazilian pediatric ICUs, for 616 patients during 946 daily telerounds. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40124-021-00242-z.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine whether teleophthalmology can help physicians in assessing and managing eye conditions and to ascertain which clinical conditions can be addressed by teleophthalmology in primary care setting. METHODS: We evaluated the resolution capacity of TeleOftalmo, strategy implemented in the public health system of southern Brazil. Resolution capacity was defined as the ability to fully address patients' eye complaints in primary care with remote assistance from ophthalmologists. Data from tele-eye reports were collected over 14 months. Resolution capacity was compared across different age groups and different ocular conditions. RESULTS: Overall, 8,142 patients had a tele-eye report issued in the study period. Resolution capacity was achieved in 5,748 (70.6%) patients. When stratified into age groups, the lowest capacity was 43.1% among subjects aged ≥65 years, while the highest was 89.7% among subjects aged 13-17 years (p<0.001). Refractive error (70.3%) and presbyopia (56.3%) were the most prevalent conditions followed by cataract (12.4%) and suspected glaucoma (7.6%). Resolution capacity was higher in cases of refractive error, presbyopia, spasm of accommodation and lid disorders than in patients diagnosed with other condition (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: With telemedicine support, primary care physicians solved over two-thirds of patients' eye or vision complaints. Refractive errors had high case resolution rates, thus having a great impact on reducing the number of referrals to specialty care. Teleophthalmology adoption in primary-care settings as part of the workup of patients with eye or vision complaints promotes a more effective use of specialty centers and will hopefully reduce waiting times for specialty referral.
Subject(s)
Cataract/diagnosis , Ocular Hypertension/diagnosis , Administration, Ophthalmic , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ophthalmology/methods , Physicians, Primary Care , Primary Health Care , Referral and Consultation , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Telemedicine , Visual Acuity/physiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive value of the pediatric-modified Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease criteria for disease course severity in patients with or without acute kidney injury admitted to a PICU. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A 12-bed PICU at a tertiary referral center in Southern Brazil. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the study unit over a 1-year period. INTERVENTIONS: A database of all eligible patients was analyzed retrospectively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were classified by pediatric-modified Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease score at admission and worst pediatric-modified Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease score during PICU hospitalization. The outcomes of interest were length of PICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of vasoactive drug therapy, and mortality. The Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 was used to assess overall disease severity at the time of PICU admission. Of 375 patients, 169 (45%) presented acute kidney injury at the time of admission and 37 developed acute kidney injury during PICU stay, for a total of 206 of 375 patients (55%) diagnosed with acute kidney injury during the study period. The median Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 score predicted a mortality rate of 9% among non-acute kidney injury patients versus a mortality rate of 16% among acute kidney injury patients (p = 0.006). The mortality of patients classified as pediatric-modified Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease F was double that predicted by Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (7 vs 3.2). Patients classified as having severe acute kidney injury (pediatric-modified Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease I + F) exhibited higher mortality (14.1%; p = 0.001) and prolonged PICU length of stay (median, 7 d; p = 0.001) when compared with other patients. Acute kidney injury is a very frequent occurrence among patients admitted to PICUs. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of acute kidney injury severity, as assessed by the pediatric-modified Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage renal disease criteria, is a good predictor of morbidity and mortality in this population. Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 tends to underestimate mortality in pediatric patients with severe acute kidney injury.
