Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation in Patients With High-Risk Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Quality of Life and Neurocognitive Analysis of a Randomized Phase II Study.

PURPOSE: To this date, studies regarding the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) versus standard of care (SoC) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer have shown limited benefit in survival outcomes, in addition to the potential effects on quality of life (QoL) and neurocognitive function (NCF). This randomized, phase II study evaluated the role of PCI in QoL and NCF, in a population comprised of subjects at a high risk for development of brain metastases (BM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer without baseline BM, harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements, or elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) at diagnosis. Participants were assigned to receive SoC or SoC plus PCI (25 Gy in 10 fractions). Primary endpoint was BM at 24 months (BM-24), for which the study was powered. Secondary endpoints included QoL assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the Lung Cancer module (LC13) and NCF assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Patients were followed every 3 months for a year for QoL and NCF. RESULTS: From May 2012 to December 2017, 84 patients were enrolled in the study, 41 were allocated to PCI while 43 received SoC. Efficacy outcomes are discussed in a separate article. The global health-QoL scores were similar at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after randomization between both study arms, with no significant differences when comparing by groups. At 1-year postrandomization, median global health QoL scores were 83 (p25-p75: 75-83) and 83 (p25-p75: 75-83) in the control and experimental arms, respectively. There were no significant changes in terms of the mean differences between subjects in either study arm when analyzing the change between baseline and 12-month scores (16.4 ± 19.9 vs 12.9 ± 14.7; P = .385). Seventeen patients were alive at database lockdown in February 2020, without significant differences in median MMSE (30 [p25-75: 29-30] vs 30 [p25-75: 28-30]) or QLQ-C30 scores (75.0 [p25-75: 50-87.2] vs 67.0 [p25-75: 50.0-100.0]). CONCLUSIONS: Among a selected high-risk population for developing BM, PCI did not significantly decrease QoL or neurocognitive function as assessed using the MMSE. Future studies are warranted to assess this observation, using more varied and sensitive tools available to date.

Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Reduces Brain Metastases and Improves Overall Survival in High-Risk Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Randomized phase 2 Study (PRoT-BM trial).

PURPOSE: To date, studies regarding the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) versus standard of care (SoC) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not shown a significant effect in terms of overall survival (OS). Additionally, the effect of PCI among high-risk patients has been scarcely studied. The objective of this randomized phase 2 study was to evaluate the role of PCI in a population of patients at high risk for development of brain metastases (BM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed NSCLC without baseline BM, harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements, or elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels at the time of diagnosis. Participants received systemic therapy according to molecular status, those without progressive disease were then assigned to receive SoC or SoC + PCI (25 Gy in 10 fractions). The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of brain metastases (CBM). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and OS. Quality of life and neurocognitive function are discussed in a separate article (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01603849). RESULTS: From May 2012 to December 2017, 84 patients were enrolled in the study, with 41 patients allocated to receive PCI and 43 received SoC. Patients allocated to receive PCI had a CBM at 24 months of 7% versus 38% in those allocated to the SoC arm. PCI was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.12 (95% confidence interval, 0.035-0.42) for developing BM. A benefit in OS was also observed (64.5 vs 19.8 months; hazard ratio: 0.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.78; P =∙007). CONCLUSIONS: Among a selected population at high risk for developing BM, PCI significantly decreased CBM in addition to increasing progression-free survival and OS. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate PCI in epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements, or elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with NSCLC, showing a significant improvement in CBM. This relevant information should be of particular importance in the context of patients without access to third-generation targeted agents. Further studies are warranted to ascertain this effect.