Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 50(2): 107954, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38217946

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: De-escalation of axillary surgery in breast cancer (BC) management began when sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) as standard of care in patients with node-negative BC. The second step consolidated ALND omission in selected subgroups of BC patients with up to two macrometastases and recognized BC molecular and genomic implication in predicting prognosis and planning adjuvant treatment. Outcomes from the recent RxPONDER and monarchE trials have come to challenge the previous cut-off of two SLN in order to inform decisions on systemic therapies for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor type-2 (HER2) negative BC, as the criteria included a cut-off of respectively three and four SLNs. In view of the controversy that this may lift in surgical practice, the Italian National Association of Breast Surgeons (Associazione Nazionale Italiana Senologi Chirurghi, ANISC) reviewed data regarding the latest trials on this topic and proposes an implementation in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed the available literature offering data on the pathological nodal status of cN0 breast cancer patients. RESULTS: The rates of pN2 status in cN0 patients ranges from 3.5 % to 16 %; pre-surgical diagnostic definition of axillary lymph node status in cN0 patients by ultrasound could be useful to inform about a possible involvement of ≥4 lymph nodes in this specific sub-groups of women. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian National Association of Breast Surgeons (ANISC) considers that for HR + HER2-/cN0-pN1(sn) BC patients undergoing breast conserving treatment the preoperative workup should be optimized for a more detailed assessment of the axilla and the technique of SLNB should be optimized, if considered appropriate by the surgeon, not considering routine ALND always indicated to determine treatment recommendations according to criteria of eligibility to RxPONDER and monarch-E trials.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Sentinel Lymph Node , Surgeons , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Lymph Node Excision , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Axilla/pathology , Italy , Sentinel Lymph Node/pathology
2.
Med Oncol ; 38(6): 67, 2021 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33970358

ABSTRACT

The multidisciplinary management represents a crucial part of the care for cancer patients, resulting in better clinical and process outcomes, with evidence of improved survival among different cancer primary sites, including breast. According with international recommendations established by the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA), all breast-cancer patients have to be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team including radiologist, pathologist, surgeon, medical oncologist and radiation oncologist. Thus, variations in clinical practice of each specialty should be discussed and shared with all team members to guarantee a fruitful cooperation among the involved specialists. During the last decades, radiation treatment was deeply changed by the evidence-based adoption of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) as standard of treatment in patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing conservative surgery. Moreover, mature randomized data have showed that partial breast irradiation (PBI) is an effective and safe alternative to whole breast irradiation in selected patients with low-risk early-stage breast cancer. Based on this background, we reviewed indications and critical issues of HFRT and PBI analyzing impact of their adoption from a multidisciplinary perspective.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Radiation Dose Hypofractionation , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery , Female , Humans , Mastectomy/methods , Surgeons
4.
Breast Cancer ; 24(3): 451-457, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27600636

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction options following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) are diverse and not yet investigated with level IA evidence. The analysis of surgical and oncological outcomes of NSM from the Italian National Registry shows its safety and wide acceptance both for prophylactic and therapeutic cases. A further in-depth analysis of the reconstructive approaches with their trend over time and their failures is the aim of this study. METHODS: Data extraction from the National Database was performed restricting cases to the 2009-2014 period. Different reconstruction procedures were analyzed in terms of their distribution over time and with respect to specific indications. A 1-year minimum follow-up was conducted to assess reconstructive unsuccessful events. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the causes of both prosthetic and autologous failures. RESULTS: 913 patients, for a total of 1006 procedures, are included in the analysis. A prosthetic only reconstruction is accomplished in 92.2 % of cases, while pure autologous tissues are employed in 4.2 % and a hybrid (prosthetic plus autologous) in 3.6 %. Direct-to-implant (DTI) reaches 48.7 % of all reconstructions in the year 2014. Prophylactic NSMs have a DTI reconstruction in 35.6 % of cases and an autologous tissue flap in 12.9 % of cases. Failures are 2.7 % overall: 0 % in pure autologous flaps and 9.1 % in hybrid cases. Significant risk factors for failures are diabetes and the previous radiation therapy on the operated breast. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction following NSM is mostly prosthetic in Italy, with DTI gaining large acceptance over time. Failures are low and occurring in diabetic and irradiated patients at the multivariate analysis.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mammaplasty/methods , Mammaplasty/trends , Mastectomy, Subcutaneous/trends , Breast Implants , Female , Humans , Italy , Mastectomy, Subcutaneous/methods , Nipples/surgery , Registries , Surgical Flaps , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Surg Oncol ; 114(2): 246-53, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27156580

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Angiosarcoma is an aggressive vascular neoplasm with a high propensity for local recurrence. Electrochemotherapy is an emerging skin-directed therapy, exerting prominent cytotoxic activity, and antivascular effects. Its efficacy in angiosarcoma has not been investigated. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective analysis reviewed patients who underwent electrochemotherapy from 2007 to 2014 for superficial advanced angiosarcomas. Bleomycin was administered intravenously and delivered within tumors by means of percutaneously applied electric pulses, according to the European Standard Operating Procedures for Electrochemotherapy. Tumor assessment was performed using RECIST (version 1.1). Toxicity (CTCAE, v4.0) and local progression-free survival (LPFS) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (13 with locally advanced and 6 with metastatic angiosarcomas) were treated. Tumor sites were: scalp (n = 5), breast (n = 8), other skin sites (n = 3), and soft tissue (n = 3). Target lesions (n = 54) ranged in size from 1.5 to 2.5 cm (median, 2 cm). Treatment was well tolerated. After 2 months, an objective response was observed in 12/19 (63%) patients, complete in 8 (42%). One-year LPFS within treatment field was 68%. Local symptom improvement included palliation of bleeding (5/19 patients) and pain relief (6/19 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Electrochemotherapy may represent a new locoregional treatment for selected patients with superficial angiosarcomas. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:246-253. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Subject(s)
Bleomycin/administration & dosage , Electrochemotherapy , Hemangiosarcoma/drug therapy , Skin Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Electrochemotherapy/adverse effects , Electrochemotherapy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Scalp , Treatment Outcome
6.
Breast ; 25: 75-81, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26612083

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nipple sparing mastectomy is deemed surgically and oncologically safe based on a long lasting literature data from reviews of single institution series. This study aims at evaluating surgical and oncological outcomes of NSM on a large multi-institutional scale, by means of the Italian National registry. METHODS: In July 2011 a panel of Italian specialists agreed upon and designed a National database of NSM. Centers with at least 150 cancers per year and following the National follow-up schedule guidelines could participate inserting any NSM case performed, retrospectively and prospectively from that moment on. In March 2015 analysis of data was accomplished. Dataset for this study consists of cases performed in the period between January 1st 2009 and December 31st 2014. RESULTS: 913 Women were included in the analysis, for a total of 1006 procedures. Prophylactic mastectomies were 124 (12.3%). MRI utilization increased over time. NSM failure rate, with NAC removal for any reason was 11.5%. NAC necrosis rate was 4.8%. Larger skin-flap necrosis rate was 2.3%. Major surgical complications rate was 4.4%. Oncological outcomes were calculated among primitive EBC cases only: locoregional recurrences rate was 2.9%, NAC recurrence 0.7%. Systemic recurrence rate was 1.0%. Five deaths (0.7%) were registered. CONCLUSIONS: More than 10% of NSM procedures are prophylactic mastectomies. MRI is gaining more importance over time. Surgical and oncological results show that NSM is effective. This National multicentric analysis enables a comparison of results with no geographical differences and a "safe" state of the art of NSM in Italy.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mastectomy, Subcutaneous/statistics & numerical data , Nipples/surgery , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Mastectomy, Subcutaneous/adverse effects , Mastectomy, Subcutaneous/methods , Middle Aged , Necrosis/epidemiology , Necrosis/etiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Flaps/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...