CIN2 in childbearing-age women: may colposcopy help choosing the proper management?

BACKGROUND: CIN2 is considered a biologically equivocal lesion falling between low- and high-grade cervical dysplasia, but it is often managed with cervical conization as a high-grade lesion. However, since cervical conization can lead to an increased risk of adverse obstetric events, it might be interesting to identify, by colposcopy, a subgroup of women with a low risk of "occult" CIN3 who could be managed with a "wait and see" approach. METHODS: All the women with CIN2 cervical biopsy from 1999 to 2019 were retrospectively identified. Their colposcopic patterns at the time of biopsy and the histopathological findings on the final cone specimen were compared. RESULTS: Among the 354 women with CIN2 biopsy included, the overall CIN3+ lesion rate on final cone specimen was 21.4%. The rate of CIN3 on final specimen was higher in women with G2 colposcopy compared to G1 (27.2% vs. 15.9%, P=0.01). Among women with G1 colposcopy, the rate of CIN3+ lesions was significantly higher in women with fine punctation (P=0.02) while no differences in women with thin acetowhite epithelium or fine mosaic emerged. CONCLUSIONS: In women with CIN2 biopsy, when a G2 pattern or G1 with fine punctation on colposcopy is detected, there is an increased risk of CIN3+ on final histology, therefore an excisional treatment should be preferred. Otherwise, in women with CIN2 biopsy and other G1 patterns on colposcopy, a "wait-and-see" approach could be considered.

Factors Related to Overtreatment in the See-and-Treat Approach: A Retrospective Multicentric Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between colposcopic features, age, menopausal status, and overtreatment in women subjected to "see-and-treat" approach, to identify subgroups of patients in which this approach could be more appropriate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective multicentric cohort study conducted on women older than 25 years, with a high-grade squamous cytological report and a visible squamocolumnar junction, in which colposcopy and the excisional procedure were performed at the same time without a previous cervical biopsy (see and treat). Overtreatment was defined as histopathological finding of cervical intraepithelial lesion grade 1 or normal tissue. RESULTS: Among the 254 included patients, the overall overtreatment rate was 12.6%, whereas in women with a grade 2 colposcopy, it was 3.2% and, in women with grade 1 colposcopy, it was 22.0%. Among the considered factors (age, menopause, and grade 1 colposcopy), only a positive association with overtreatment and grade 1 colposcopy emerged (odds ratio = 8.70, 95% CI = 2.95-25.62, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: See and treat may be appropriate in women older than 25 years with a visible squamocolumnar junction and a high-grade squamous cervical cytology. Patients need to be informed about the higher risk of overtreatment in case of a grade 1 colposcopic impression, which however may still be considered acceptable. Patient's age and menopausal status should not influence the decision to propose a see-and-treat approach.